![blackpillednigga](/data/avatars/m/40/40150.jpg?1724025779)
blackpillednigga
Overlord
★★★★★
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2022
- Posts
- 8,291
define communism. without searching it up. I wanna know if you really do hate communism, or if its some liberal ideology you got mixed up with
Most people here are right wing liberals or "fascists" who think everything they dislike is jewishLol you asking libgroids to define communism...
Literally the biggest reason of poligamy sluttery and all this faggotry trash is fault of liberalism, in an authoritarian goverment that doesnt happen.Most people here are right wing liberals or "fascists" who think everything they dislike is jewish
Communism and Liberalism are both forms of Jewish control. One allows the Jew to immediately take over a country by seizing all property. The other allows the Jew to gradually take over a country through usury, finance, and media manipulation.Literally the biggest reason of poligamy sluttery and all this faggotry trash is fault of liberalism, in an authoritarian goverment that doesnt happen.
literally the only communist country taken over by jews was the soviet union but later on stalin purged the kikes. communism nowadays has very little to do with jewsOne allows the Jew to immediately take over a country by seizing all property.
thats how all jews were allowed to take power. a country preventing any greedy people from rising to power would be kike-proofThe other allows the Jew to gradually take over a country through usury, finance, and media manipulation.
capitalist jews liberalize it, but they did not take part in the communist revolutions. thats schizo shitThe Jew foments Communism in agricultural economies as a way to rapidly industrialize. Once it's industrialized to the point where it can be exploited by banks and finance, the Jews liberalize it.
yes liberalism is the problem. not communismThat's why there's never been a true Communist threat in America; America's been an industrial nation for a very long while. However, Liberalism infested every aspect of the U.S Government after Woodrow Wilson's second term and his part in creating the Federal Reserve.
Jej, Stalin didn’t purge shit. Communism is still as Jewish as it once was. China, however, doesn’t count. China’s a lot like North Korea; it claims to be communist, but really exists on differing practices.literally the only communist country taken over by jews was the soviet union but later on stalin purged the kikes. communism nowadays has very little to do with jews
Checked and based.thats how all jews were allowed to take power. a country preventing any greedy people from rising to power would be kike-proof
Exactly! The Liberal Jews come in later. The Liberal Jews and Communist Jews did not like each other, before Communism as a concept was absorbed into the ever-expanding liberal morass that encompasses the world today. Colin Jordan wrote a book on this exact topic and how it played into Stalin’s supposed anti-Jewish expulsions. https://archive.org/details/fraudul...art-by-jordan-colin-z-lib.org/page/1/mode/1upcapitalist jews liberalize it, but they did not take part in the communist revolutions. thats schizo shit
Communism and Liberalism are both the problem, and both should be dealt with via extreme prejudice.yes liberalism is the problem. not communism
define communism. without searching it up. I wanna know if you really do hate communism, or if its some liberal ideology you got mixed up with
Communism killed the patriarchate in Russia, which ended in 1917, and in the West the patriarchate lived until the 1960s.define communism. without searching it up. I wanna know if you really do hate communism, or if its some liberal ideology you got mixed up with
Correct. So why are you against eliminating classes? Don't mention the Soviet union and its satellite states as their method of collectivization was not agreed upon by all marxists. Like why are you against the concept in general?Communism is just the end goal of socialism once the worldwide worker revolution has been archived. Socialism is collective ownership of the means of production & wealth redistribution to eliminate class differences.
Communism is always Feminism and gender equality.Correct. So why are you against eliminating classes? Don't mention the Soviet union and its satellite states as their method of collectivization was not agreed upon by all marxists. Like why are you against the concept in general?
No not always. North Korea and china aren't infected by feminism. Are you against collectivization in general?Communism is always Feminism and gender equality.
I am against the rights of foids to divorce and education and the right to work. Under the Russian Empire, there was no matriarchy - foids could not fall for divorce, since the decision remained with the church and the church rarely gave a divorce. Today, in Russia after Communism, the divorce rate is 73%.No not always. North Korea and china aren't infected by feminism. Are you against collectivization in general?
Russia is an example of what communism does. Communism is always matriarchy and the power of foids.No not always. North Korea and china aren't infected by feminism. Are you against collectivization in general?
So just as I thought you're not anti-communist, but anti-liberal. If you have no problem with eliminating classes and collectivizing the economy, then communism isn't your enemy. Marxism is more like a template and as long as you want a classless society you can add more to it and make your own ideology. Marxist-leninists are more liberal than marxist-maoists for instanceI am against the rights of foids to divorce and education and the right to work. Under the Russian Empire, there was no matriarchy - foids could not fall for divorce, since the decision remained with the church and the church rarely gave a divorce. Today, in Russia after Communism, the divorce rate is 73%.
Any Marxism stands for women's rights. Gender equality is the basis of fierce Marxism.So just as I thought you're not anti-communist, but anti-liberal. If you have no problem with eliminating classes and collectivizing the economy, then communism isn't your enemy. Marxism is more like a template and as long as you want a classless society you can add more to it and make your own ideology. Marxist-leninists are more liberal than marxist-maoists for instance
There's always going to be class-differences in society. There's always going to be people more talented & hard-working than others. Class differences are good for society since they encourage self discipline to try & increase your class. Rich people can even do things for good. Just look at Elon Musk or Donald Trump for example.Correct. So why are you against eliminating classes? Don't mention the Soviet union and its satellite states as their method of collectivization was not agreed upon by all marxists. Like why are you against the concept in general?
I am against the rights of foids to divorce and education and the right to work. Under the Russian Empire, there was no matriarchy - foids could not fall for divorce, since the decision remained with the church and the church rarely gave a divorce. Today, in Russia after Communism, the divorce rate is 73%.
We are never going to get rid of class difference. So why not just use it for our own benefit?There's always going to be class-differences in society. There's always going to be people more talented & hard-working than others. Class differences are good for society since they encourage self discipline to try & increase your class. Rich people can even do things for good. Just look at Elon Musk or Donald Trump for example.
the world isnt that simple. in todays society hard work wont always land you success but genetics and your family background will. I thought that would be apparent when you took the blackpillThere's always going to be class-differences in society. There's always going to be people more talented & hard-working than others. Class differences are good for society since they encourage self discipline to try & increase your class. Rich people can even do things for good. Just look at Elon Musk or Donald Trump for example.
NPC answer. so you just mistook liberalism as communism, as all NPCs didCommunism = gay, pedos, feminine men, whore women ,race mixing , kids cutting there dicks off, listening to nigger and paki empowerment when they don't belong in the west + communism is jewish
no, communism is a stateless classless moneyless society. it doesnt have to involve government intervention and theres many other ways we can achieve thatCommunism is when the government planifies the economy, the problem is that you can't planify an economy without monopolizing it, and you can't monopolize a country's economy and institutions without becoming a fucking tyranny.
Hierarchies are good. Some men are superior to others and this should be embraced. Why put down extraordinary individuals in favor of the vulgar and mindless herd?So just as I thought you're not anti-communist, but anti-liberal. If you have no problem with eliminating classes and collectivizing the economy, then communism isn't your enemy. Marxism is more like a template and as long as you want a classless society you can add more to it and make your own ideology. Marxist-leninists are more liberal than marxist-maoists for instance
only anarchists want to abolish hierarchy completely. communists only want to abolish the economic classes since alot of people on top didnt deserve to get where theyre at and also dont care about their community, only making more money. these people shouldnt lead nor be on topHierarchies are good. Some men are superior to others and this should be embraced. Why put down extraordinary individuals in favor of the vulgar and mindless herd?
The ultimate goal of communism is collectivist anarchy, since, according to Marx, all hierarchies ultimately stem from economic hierarchies, that is the class system. In communism, the state is only a means to an end.only anarchists want to abolish hierarchy completely. communists only want to abolish the economic classes since alot of people on top didnt deserve to get where theyre at and also dont care about their community, only making more money. these people shouldnt lead nor be on top
Marx praised the liberalism and capitalism of his time because they were destroying traditional values. He regarded capitalism as a necessary stage in human history that had to develop before communism could be introduced. He believed in social progress above everything else.NPC answer. so you just mistook liberalism as communism, as all NPCs did
well I dont know about you but I wouldnt want corporations and bankers to lead my country just because they make more money. and I disagree with marx if he really said that because alot of hierarchies are formed naturally based on who appears stronger or more capable for their roles. regardless I think having no economic classes would be based since there would be more social cohesion and less greedy peopleThe ultimate goal of communism is collectivist anarchy, since, according to Marx, all hierarchies ultimately stem from economic hierarchies, that is the class system. In communism, the state is only a means to an end.
I dont agree with most of marx's cultural views, but I agree with all of his economic pointsMarx praised the liberalism and capitalism of his time because they were destroying traditional values. He regarded capitalism as a necessary stage in human history that had to develop before communism could be introduced. He believed in social progress above everything else.
Jeff Bezos's & George Soros are both ugly as fuck yet billionaires. Hell even Elon Musk & Mark Zuckerberg are ugly. Anyone can become a billionaire though the right strategy. Stop conflicting become a billionaire with dating. Makes you look retarded. Anyways socialists want capitalism for themselves & socialism for everyone else. Here's some examples.the world isnt that simple. in todays society hard work wont always land you success but genetics and your family background will. I thought that would be apparent when you took the blackpill
Hasan “HasanAbi” Dogan Piker is a 31-year-old American Twitch streamer and political commentator. According to Net Worth Spot, his net worth is estimated at around USD 2.6 million.
Russell Brand is an English comedian, actor, author, and radio host who has a net worth of $20 million. Russell Brand first gained attention in 2004 as the host of "Big Brother" spinoff "Big Brother's Big Mouth." He landed his first major film role in 2007's "St Trinian's." In 2008, he starred as rocker Aldous Snow in "Forgetting Sarah Marshall" and reprised his role in 2010's "Get Him to the Greek." Russell has appeared in dozens of movies and television shows and has received several awards, including three British Comedy Awards. In recent years, Russell has become better known as the host of several podcasts/YouTube channels: "The Russell Brand Podcast" and " Under the Skin with Russell Brand."
Nicolas Maduro is a Venezuelan politician who has a net worth of $2 million. Nicolas Maduro was born in Caracas, Venezuela in November 1962. Maduro is the current President of Venezuela. Nicolas became interested in politics on his high school's student union. For many years he worked as a bus driver before becoming a trade unionist for bus drivers in the Caracas Metro system. Maduro was also a bodyguard for Jose Vicente Rangel during his 1983 presidential campaign. Nicolas was instrumental in the founding of the Movement of the Fifth Republic.
Jeremy Corbyn is a British politician who has a net worth of $4 million. Jeremy Corbyn was born in Chippenham, England, United Kingdom in May 1949. He is a member of the Labour party and graduated from North London Polytechnic. Corbyn became a Member of Parliament for Islington North in June 1983.
Why aren't they re- distributing their own money? Seems inconsistent to me.If you’re thinking Bernie Sanders has tens of millions of dollars in the bank, you’d be mistaken. Instead, the senator has a net worth of $3 million, according to Celebrity Net Worth. Still, that’s enough to qualify him as a millionaire a few times over.
Then you are not a Marxist then. For Marx you would be a "reactionary socialist" and for today's Marxists you are a "red fascist".I dont agree with most of marx's cultural views, but I agree with all of his economic points
In fascism/national socialism, all classes work together for the good of the nation and/or race, with the state acting as a mediator between them. Why create civil conflict and divide the people when they can be made to work together? Capitalism is the tyranny of the bourgeoisie, while communism is the tyranny of the proletariat, both screw everyone in society who is not part of their class.well I dont know about you but I wouldnt want corporations and bankers to lead my country just because they make more money. and I disagree with marx if he really said that because alot of hierarchies are formed naturally based on who appears stronger or more capable for their roles. regardless I think having no economic classes would be based since there would be more social cohesion and less greedy people
my point is the people that actually did "muh hard workJeff Bezos's & George Soros are both ugly as fuck yet billionaires. Hell even Elon Musk & Mark Zuckerberg are ugly. Anyone can become a billionaire though the right strategy.
funny because I think capitalists want socialism for themselves. since they get alot of governmental aid to protect their corporations and wealth, while preaching NPCs that they have to do "muh hard work" aka wageslave without any government support if they want to reach the same levelAnyways socialists want capitalism for themselves & socialism for everyone else.
because redistributing using government aid is more ideal than bankrupting themselves. JFL at this whataboutismHere's some examples.
How Much is HasanAbi’s Total Net Worth?
Know all about HasanAbi’s Total Net Worth, Earnings from Entrepreneurial initiatives, Expenditure & other interesting facts about HasanAbi in this detailed guide.www.sportskeeda.com
![]()
Socialist Twitch Streamer Endures Wrath of Twitter for Buying $3M Home
According to some parts of Twitter, Hasan Piker’s decision to buy a $3 million home in the heart of Los Angeles was unethical.www.thedailybeast.com
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
How Senator Bernie Sanders Made His Millions
Bernie Sanders, an American politician born Sept. 8, 1941, is a U.S. Senator from Vermont who has served since 2006. He is the longest-standing independent in Congressional history and has made two...finance.yahoo.com
Why aren't they re- distributing their own money? Seems inconsistent to me.
my point is the people that actually did "muh hard work" to become rich are a very rare minority. most billionares including the ones you listed received help from their family which they were already quite well off when they started. cuckservatives want you to believe that you could become a jeff bezos if you wage slave and grind 24/7 to kikes, thats obviously a cope
funny because I think capitalists want socialism for themselves. since they get alot of governmental aid to protect their corporations and wealth, while preaching NPCs that they have to do "muh hard work" aka wageslave without any government support if they want to reach the same level
because redistributing using government aid is more ideal than bankrupting themselves. JFL at this whataboutism
but by most other peoples standards Im still a marxist since I support economic collectivization, which is what most people look at when they think of marxThen you are not a Marxist then. For Marx you would be a "reactionary socialist" and for today's Marxists you are a "red fascist".
the fascist economy was quite inconsistent and quite hard to regulate since having the state mediate everything allowed for corruption. most of the time the nazi party sided with the corporations over the workers which made it not very different from capitalism. it also wouldve collapsed by itself anyways had the regime lasted longerIn fascism/national socialism, all classes work together for the good of the nation and/or race, with the state acting as a mediator between them. Why create civil conflict and divide the people when they can be made to work together?
Lmao, do you think there was no corruption in the Soviet system? If anything, the Nazi system was less corrupt as it encouraged competition and merit rather than complete equality. And what's wrong with relying on educated managers, most of whom reached their position thanks to their merit, rather than the hordes of ignorant workers? Truth be told, the vast majority of working class people are very mediocre individuals, neither deserving nor fit to run state affairs. Anyways, in the Third Reich, the corporations were subordinate to the state and did what the state demanded of them.the fascist economy was quite inconsistent and quite hard to regulate since having the state mediate everything allowed for corruption. most of the time the nazi party sided with the corporations over the workers which made it not very different from capitalism. it also wouldve collapsed by itself anyways had the regime lasted longer
Who cares what most people think. Most people are ignorant. You are not a Marxist because you reject the basic principles of that thinking. The destruction of the class system is supposed to usher in social progress and change, but you have deluded yourself into thinking that this can make society culturally reactionary or conservative again.but by most other peoples standards Im still a marxist since I support economic collectivization, which is what most people look at when they think of marx
Basically what I was going to say, but I would have mentioned the certain (((groups))) involvement in its establishment.Communism is just the end goal of socialism once the worldwide worker revolution has been archived. Socialism is collective ownership of the means of production & wealth redistribution to eliminate class differences.
This.There's always going to be class-differences in society. There's always going to be people more talented & hard-working than others. Class differences are good for society since they encourage self discipline to try & increase your class. Rich people can even do things for good. Just look at Elon Musk or Donald Trump for example.
It preaches the false notion of Egalitarianism, which ofc will coincide with that.Communism is always Feminism and gender equality.
Well this is correct, and is essentially the reason why I advocate for some "third way" between Capitalism or Communism which I spoke of above.the world isnt that simple. in todays society hard work wont always land you success but genetics and your family background will. I thought that would be apparent when you took the blackpill
I understand that many rich people dont deserve to be rich, they didn't earn it and they abuse their power, however, there's something I don't understand: why should I be forced to care about my community? I'm very individualistic and I would prefer if the government gave opportunities to the poor with vouchers or something like that, rather than using violence to force people to care for each other.communists only want to abolish the economic classes since alot of people on top didnt deserve to get where theyre at and also dont care about their community
well the government should help in aiding the community but you will be paying the taxes, so you are involved. I understand the individualistic mindset as usually your "community" did jack to help you or befriend you but if everyone was like you, then nothing will change and we would still be stuck in this capitalist hellhole where only greedy and selfish people are in power. would you rather have that or live in a community where everyone does care for each other despite differences and greedy people are actually condemned?I understand that many rich people dont deserve to be rich, they didn't earn it and they abuse their power, however, there's something I don't understand: why should I be forced to care about my community? I'm very individualistic and I would prefer if the government gave opportunities to the poor with vouchers or something like that, rather than using violence to force people to care for each other.
Liberalism is a huge problem, and I think all of us here can agree to that, but I'd like to hear about how you think communism isn't.yes liberalism is the problem. not communism
Communism doesn't have to involve the degeneration of culture and feminism. In alot of communist countries it's socially conservativeLiberalism is a huge problem, and I think all of us here can agree to that, but I'd like to hear about how you think communism isn't.
For the record, I am anti-communist, but not for reasons you may think.
OK, butCommunism doesn't have to involve the degeneration of culture and feminism. In alot of communist countries it's socially conservative
a problem.but I'd like to hear about how you think communism isn't