define communism. without searching it up. I wanna know if you really do hate communism, or if its some liberal ideology you got mixed up with
Lol you asking libgroids to define communism...
Most people here are right wing liberals or "fascists" who think everything they dislike is jewish
Literally the biggest reason of poligamy sluttery and all this faggotry trash is fault of liberalism, in an authoritarian goverment that doesnt happen.
Communism and Liberalism are both forms of Jewish control. One allows the Jew to immediately take over a country by seizing all property. The other allows the Jew to gradually take over a country through usury, finance, and media manipulation.
The Jew foments Communism in agricultural economies as a way to rapidly industrialize. Once it's industrialized to the point where it can be exploited by banks and finance, the Jews liberalize it. That's why there's never been a true Communist threat in America; America's been an industrial nation for a very long while. However, Liberalism infested every aspect of the U.S Government after Woodrow Wilson's second term and his part in creating the Federal Reserve.
Last edited:
literally the only communist country taken over by jews was the soviet union but later on stalin purged the kikes. communism nowadays has very little to do with jews
thats how all jews were allowed to take power. a country preventing any greedy people from rising to power would be kike-proof
capitalist jews liberalize it, but they did not take part in the communist revolutions. thats schizo shit
yes liberalism is the problem. not communism
Jej, Stalin didn’t purge shit. Communism is still as Jewish as it once was. China, however, doesn’t count. China’s a lot like North Korea; it claims to be communist, but really exists on differing practices.
Checked and based.
Exactly! The Liberal Jews come in later. The Liberal Jews and Communist Jews did not like each other, before Communism as a concept was absorbed into the ever-expanding liberal morass that encompasses the world today. Colin Jordan wrote a book on this exact topic and how it played into Stalin’s supposed anti-Jewish expulsions. https://archive.org/details/fraudul...art-by-jordan-colin-z-lib.org/page/1/mode/1up
Communism and Liberalism are both the problem, and both should be dealt with via extreme prejudice.
Last edited:
Stateless and classless society
Not that I have anything against a society like that but it will never be possible. Only a naive person would believe in something like that. Communist manifesto is literally Jewish ink that has poisoned the minds of millions of people around the world.
Not that I have anything against a society like that but it will never be possible. Only a naive person would believe in something like that. Communist manifesto is literally Jewish ink that has poisoned the minds of millions of people around the world.
(i actually dont know much about communism but here LOLOL)
an economic system which aims to eliminate government and social classes by making everyone equal (or it's more of an equitable system i cant remember)
an economic system which aims to eliminate government and social classes by making everyone equal (or it's more of an equitable system i cant remember)
Communism is the dictatorship of the proletariat - that is, the dictatorship of the working class.
Communism killed the patriarchate in Russia, which ended in 1917, and in the West the patriarchate lived until the 1960s.
An economic system with central planning. It’s something I advocate in regards to distribution of foids. Seize the means of reproduction!
Communism is just the end goal of socialism once the worldwide worker revolution has been archived. Socialism is collective ownership of the means of production & wealth redistribution to eliminate class differences.
Correct. So why are you against eliminating classes? Don't mention the Soviet union and its satellite states as their method of collectivization was not agreed upon by all marxists. Like why are you against the concept in general?
Communism is always Feminism and gender equality.
No not always. North Korea and china aren't infected by feminism. Are you against collectivization in general?
I am against the rights of foids to divorce and education and the right to work. Under the Russian Empire, there was no matriarchy - foids could not fall for divorce, since the decision remained with the church and the church rarely gave a divorce. Today, in Russia after Communism, the divorce rate is 73%.
Russia is an example of what communism does. Communism is always matriarchy and the power of foids.
So just as I thought you're not anti-communist, but anti-liberal. If you have no problem with eliminating classes and collectivizing the economy, then communism isn't your enemy. Marxism is more like a template and as long as you want a classless society you can add more to it and make your own ideology. Marxist-leninists are more liberal than marxist-maoists for instance
Any Marxism stands for women's rights. Gender equality is the basis of fierce Marxism.
There's always going to be class-differences in society. There's always going to be people more talented & hard-working than others. Class differences are good for society since they encourage self discipline to try & increase your class. Rich people can even do things for good. Just look at Elon Musk or Donald Trump for example.
We are never going to get rid of class difference. So why not just use it for our own benefit?
A communist utopia is just a soyciety ruled by midwits.
idk public ownership of means of production, classless society or whatever
Communism = gay, pedos, feminine men, whore women ,race mixing , kids cutting there dicks off, listening to nigger and paki empowerment when they don't belong in the west + communism is jewish
Communism is when the government planifies the economy, the problem is that you can't planify an economy without monopolizing it, and you can't monopolize a country's economy and institutions without becoming a fucking tyranny.
the world isnt that simple. in todays society hard work wont always land you success but genetics and your family background will. I thought that would be apparent when you took the blackpill
NPC answer. so you just mistook liberalism as communism, as all NPCs did
no, communism is a stateless classless moneyless society. it doesnt have to involve government intervention and theres many other ways we can achieve that
Hierarchies are good. Some men are superior to others and this should be embraced. Why put down extraordinary individuals in favor of the vulgar and mindless herd?
only anarchists want to abolish hierarchy completely. communists only want to abolish the economic classes since alot of people on top didnt deserve to get where theyre at and also dont care about their community, only making more money. these people shouldnt lead nor be on top
The ultimate goal of communism is collectivist anarchy, since, according to Marx, all hierarchies ultimately stem from economic hierarchies, that is the class system. In communism, the state is only a means to an end.
Marx praised the liberalism and capitalism of his time because they were destroying traditional values. He regarded capitalism as a necessary stage in human history that had to develop before communism could be introduced. He believed in social progress above everything else.
well I dont know about you but I wouldnt want corporations and bankers to lead my country just because they make more money. and I disagree with marx if he really said that because alot of hierarchies are formed naturally based on who appears stronger or more capable for their roles. regardless I think having no economic classes would be based since there would be more social cohesion and less greedy people
I dont agree with most of marx's cultural views, but I agree with all of his economic points
Jeff Bezos's & George Soros are both ugly as fuck yet billionaires. Hell even Elon Musk & Mark Zuckerberg are ugly. Anyone can become a billionaire though the right strategy. Stop conflicting become a billionaire with dating. Makes you look retarded. Anyways socialists want capitalism for themselves & socialism for everyone else. Here's some examples.
How Much is HasanAbi’s Total Net Worth?
Know all about HasanAbi’s Total Net Worth, Earnings from Entrepreneurial initiatives, Expenditure & other interesting facts about HasanAbi in this detailed guide.
www.sportskeeda.com
Socialist Twitch Streamer Endures Wrath of Twitter for Buying $3M Home
According to some parts of Twitter, Hasan Piker’s decision to buy a $3 million home in the heart of Los Angeles was unethical.
www.thedailybeast.com
How Senator Bernie Sanders Made His Millions
Bernie Sanders, an American politician born Sept. 8, 1941, is a U.S. Senator from Vermont who has served since 2006. He is the longest-standing independent in Congressional history and has made two...
Why aren't they re- distributing their own money? Seems inconsistent to me.
Then you are not a Marxist then. For Marx you would be a "reactionary socialist" and for today's Marxists you are a "red fascist".
In fascism/national socialism, all classes work together for the good of the nation and/or race, with the state acting as a mediator between them. Why create civil conflict and divide the people when they can be made to work together? Capitalism is the tyranny of the bourgeoisie, while communism is the tyranny of the proletariat, both screw everyone in society who is not part of their class.
my point is the people that actually did "muh hard work
" to become rich are a very rare minority. most billionares including the ones you listed received help from their family which they were already quite well off when they started. cuckservatives want you to believe that you could become a jeff bezos if you wage slave and grind 24/7 to kikes, thats obviously a copefunny because I think capitalists want socialism for themselves. since they get alot of governmental aid to protect their corporations and wealth, while preaching NPCs that they have to do "muh hard work" aka wageslave without any government support if they want to reach the same level
because redistributing using government aid is more ideal than bankrupting themselves. JFL at this whataboutismHere's some examples.
How Much is HasanAbi’s Total Net Worth?
Know all about HasanAbi’s Total Net Worth, Earnings from Entrepreneurial initiatives, Expenditure & other interesting facts about HasanAbi in this detailed guide.
Socialist Twitch Streamer Endures Wrath of Twitter for Buying $3M Home
According to some parts of Twitter, Hasan Piker’s decision to buy a $3 million home in the heart of Los Angeles was unethical.www.thedailybeast.com
How Senator Bernie Sanders Made His Millions
Bernie Sanders, an American politician born Sept. 8, 1941, is a U.S. Senator from Vermont who has served since 2006. He is the longest-standing independent in Congressional history and has made two...finance.yahoo.com
Why aren't they re- distributing their own money? Seems inconsistent to me.
my point is the people that actually did "muh hard work
funny because I think capitalists want socialism for themselves. since they get alot of governmental aid to protect their corporations and wealth, while preaching NPCs that they have to do "muh hard work" aka wageslave without any government support if they want to reach the same level
because redistributing using government aid is more ideal than bankrupting themselves. JFL at this whataboutism
Would you claim all the billionaires here "Received help from their families"? Maybe some of them but not all of them. They are grown men who can look after themselves after all. I don't think I've ever heard conservatives saying you can become a Jeff Bezo's if you work hard. They just claim you will have enough money to sustain yourself which is true. As well, there's both socialist & capitalist jews. Jews aren't united on this topic. Karl Marx & Leon Trotsky were both jewish as was Murry Rothbard. "Wage slave" Is also a contradiction since slavery means working with no money. When you work you make money. Have you even worked a day in your life? I have & I know that socialism is nonsense based on it. I only did what I was told & could care less how the company was run. Would you call someone working for a Christian bakery "Wageslaving & grinding for the kikes"? Serious question.
That's also some capitalist companies not all of them. That's also the opposite of a free market since the government is intervening to help companies. That's corporatism not socialism.
They should still practice what they preach & redistribute their own money. I'm sure all of their supporters will be able to provide them food & shelter & some money. But hey at least you admit socialism can't function without a dictatorship.
but by most other peoples standards Im still a marxist since I support economic collectivization, which is what most people look at when they think of marx
the fascist economy was quite inconsistent and quite hard to regulate since having the state mediate everything allowed for corruption. most of the time the nazi party sided with the corporations over the workers which made it not very different from capitalism. it also wouldve collapsed by itself anyways had the regime lasted longer
Lmao, do you think there was no corruption in the Soviet system? If anything, the Nazi system was less corrupt as it encouraged competition and merit rather than complete equality. And what's wrong with relying on educated managers, most of whom reached their position thanks to their merit, rather than the hordes of ignorant workers? Truth be told, the vast majority of working class people are very mediocre individuals, neither deserving nor fit to run state affairs. Anyways, in the Third Reich, the corporations were subordinate to the state and did what the state demanded of them.
Who cares what most people think. Most people are ignorant. You are not a Marxist because you reject the basic principles of that thinking. The destruction of the class system is supposed to usher in social progress and change, but you have deluded yourself into thinking that this can make society culturally reactionary or conservative again.
Basically what I was going to say, but I would have mentioned the certain (((groups))) involvement in its establishment.
This.
I support aspects such as socialized healthcare, redistribution of wealth, etc. but I also acknowledge the adherence of a natural state & the need to respect it & exist within it and/or alongside it.
Some are just more fit for certain roles than others; from each according to his ability to each according to his need.
I would say my economics align with the belief of Corporatism or rather "traditional socialism" I will probably share a video on the basic principles of Corporatism.
It preaches the false notion of Egalitarianism, which ofc will coincide with that.
Well this is correct, and is essentially the reason why I advocate for some "third way" between Capitalism or Communism which I spoke of above.
I understand that many rich people dont deserve to be rich, they didn't earn it and they abuse their power, however, there's something I don't understand: why should I be forced to care about my community? I'm very individualistic and I would prefer if the government gave opportunities to the poor with vouchers or something like that, rather than using violence to force people to care for each other.
well the government should help in aiding the community but you will be paying the taxes, so you are involved. I understand the individualistic mindset as usually your "community" did jack to help you or befriend you but if everyone was like you, then nothing will change and we would still be stuck in this capitalist hellhole where only greedy and selfish people are in power. would you rather have that or live in a community where everyone does care for each other despite differences and greedy people are actually condemned?
A Jewish invention, lead by Jews
B
Liberalism is a huge problem, and I think all of us here can agree to that, but I'd like to hear about how you think communism isn't.
For the record, I am anti-communist, but not for reasons you may think.
Last edited:
Communism doesn't have to involve the degeneration of culture and feminism. In alot of communist countries it's socially conservative
Communism is Judaism.
Total state control over autonomy.
No private property, no surplus income aka capital, no freedom of movement, no freedom of speech, no dissidence against any narrative, basically no rights whatsoever while you worship the state as a God of some sort
Put simply, Communism=Hell
Total state control over autonomy.
No private property, no surplus income aka capital, no freedom of movement, no freedom of speech, no dissidence against any narrative, basically no rights whatsoever while you worship the state as a God of some sort
Put simply, Communism=Hell
the propaganda is boring and the uniforms are shit besides a select few. i subscribe too no ideology because im the one that is getting fucked over in the end
B
Last edited:
A
Communism just didn't work. It had its chance and it failed. Plus I value freedoms such as property ownership. I do however support anti-consumerism, degrowth to some extent and dealing with the Jewish banking system.
Last edited:
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
