Discussion A Psycho-Analysis on Incel Fetishes

[tulasdanslos]

I used to post on r/braincels.


This is what my mouth looks like, it's the primary deformity. The rest of my face is normal except for a really bent ear and super asymmetrical eyes.

Holy shit!

Kill it with fire!

 

[MENSA_IQcel]

Holy shit!

Kill it with fire!

Tbh it's not as bad as the picture I showed you but it's bad enough to be noticable. Also keep in mind its JUST THE MOUTH, i don't have the other condition that boy has.

Also fuck you for trying to make me feel even worse on a forum of people known for being bullied for how we look.

 

[Deleted member 17997]

View attachment 228986
fuck u greycel

 

[tulasdanslos]

Tbh it's not as bad as the picture I showed you but it's bad enough to be noticable. Also keep in mind its JUST THE MOUTH, i don't have the other condition that boy has.

Also fuck you for trying to make me feel even worse on a forum of people known for being bullied for how we look.

The irony of my reaction was not lost on me. I'm on the low 100s in terms of IQ, I'm not completely retarded.

 

[PPEcel]

Mathematical economic theory and occasional some statistics. My papers are about LIBOR and policy recommendations for the ECB, specifically about negative interest rates.

That's exactly why I'm studying it moron. We're studying the total effect it's had on the economy and the euro-market in general so we can better understand the appropriate monetary policy for the ECB.

I attended a speech that Mario Draghi gave a couple of years ago and he delivered it in such a monotone, I fell asleep. Anyways, I thought he was a decent ECB President. So what do you think about Lagarde's decision to keep ECB rates unchanged last month?

Can you also elaborate on why your paper about the ECB addresses LIBOR instead of Euribor, which would be far more pertinent to the Euro interbank market? Please explain because I'm only an undergraduate.

 

[based_meme]

Disregard. Didn't see your post on my feed for some reason. Sorry.

 

[Yerberito]

Love exist for chad and stacy

 

[MENSA_IQcel]

I attended a speech that Mario Draghi gave a couple of years ago and he delivered it in such a monotone, I fell asleep. Anyways, I thought he was a decent ECB President. So what do you think about Lagarde's decision to keep ECB rates unchanged last month?

Can you also elaborate on why your paper about the ECB addresses LIBOR instead of Euribor, which would be far more pertinent to the Euro interbank market? Please explain because I'm only an undergraduate.

I didn't get too specific on this forum but the paper is more about how the two effect each other and how they can implicitly coordinate and cooperate with each other to get the best result. Euribor is directly influenced by the ECB so there wouldn't really be much to write about in that regard. The paper also goes over how the FED and Russian central banks influence the Euro-markets but it's mainly focused on LIBOR (mainly because of Brexit).

I am against what the ECB has done because I believe they still have very orthodox views on money. They see negative interest rates (on bank rate loans) as an inherent bad that needs to be avoided at all costs unless absolutely necessary. This is largely due to the way their balance sheets are structured, negative interest rates on bank rate loans is the only real way to stimulate an economy going through a real rapid contraction. I also think the ECB is fundamentally flawed in structure because it doesn't coordinate and transfer its profits to a treasury so it slowly builds up an unpayable debt burden.

What's your opinion the ECB situation?

Also I must ask are you familiar with or supportive of MMT by any chance?

 

[PPEcel]

I didn't get too specific on this forum but the paper is more about how the two effect each other and how they can implicitly coordinate and cooperate with each other to get the best result. Euribor is directly influenced by the ECB so there wouldn't really be much to write about in that regard. The paper also goes over how the FED and Russian central banks influence the Euro-markets but it's mainly focused on LIBOR (mainly because of Brexit).

I am against what the ECB has done because I believe they still have very orthodox views on money. They see negative interest rates (on bank rate loans) as an inherent bad that needs to be avoided at all costs unless absolutely necessary. This is largely due to the way their balance sheets are structured, negative interest rates on bank rate loans is the only real way to stimulate an economy going through a real rapid contraction. I also think the ECB is fundamentally flawed in structure because it doesn't coordinate and transfer its profits to a treasury so it slowly builds up an unpayable debt burden.

What's your opinion the ECB situation?

Also I must ask are you familiar with or supportive of MMT by any chance?

I see you're an MMT advocate?

I don't really think that the gulf between MMT and mainstream macroeconomics is really as big as some academics make it out to be, and as a politicalsciencecel, I'm somewhat more concerned about the policy implications of MMT, which essentially boils down to "let fiscal policy take care of everything".

 

[SchrodingersDick]

I'd love to here your theory, I'm always interested in high-IQ posts.

I have a facial deformity, making me a 1/10 automatically.

What’s your height and race?

I used to post on r/braincels.


This is what my mouth looks like, it's the primary deformity. The rest of my face is normal except for a really bent ear and super asymmetrical eyes.

Your mouth is like the kid’s on the right? Doesn’t look bad.

 

[endofdopamine]

I see you're an MMT advocate?

I don't really think that the gulf between MMT and mainstream macroeconomics is really as big as some academics make it out to be, and as a politicalsciencecel, I'm somewhat more concerned about the policy implications of MMT, which essentially boils down to "let fiscal policy take care of everything".

I didn't get too specific on this forum but the paper is more about how the two effect each other and how they can implicitly coordinate and cooperate with each other to get the best result. Euribor is directly influenced by the ECB so there wouldn't really be much to write about in that regard. The paper also goes over how the FED and Russian central banks influence the Euro-markets but it's mainly focused on LIBOR (mainly because of Brexit).

I am against what the ECB has done because I believe they still have very orthodox views on money. They see negative interest rates (on bank rate loans) as an inherent bad that needs to be avoided at all costs unless absolutely necessary. This is largely due to the way their balance sheets are structured, negative interest rates on bank rate loans is the only real way to stimulate an economy going through a real rapid contraction. I also think the ECB is fundamentally flawed in structure because it doesn't coordinate and transfer its profits to a treasury so it slowly builds up an unpayable debt burden.

What's your opinion the ECB situation?

Also I must ask are you familiar with or supportive of MMT by any chance?

"The idea that government borrowings are effectively unconstrained is just preposterous. We live in a world of fiat currency, our entire economy is rooted in the belief that the dollar has value, and, MMT says that people will maintain that belief even as the government explicitly prints money. And all that comes to my mind is the hyperinflation of Germany... when times are challenging such that inflation is accelerating, ready for this? Governments will make the hard decisions to cut spending and increase taxes. Our track record with that... we know that around the world."

-Ken Griffith, CEO of Citadel (42:30)

 

[metabuxx]

Love exist for chad and stacy

And coping exists for us

 

[TuxDix]

What about surreal fetishes? My fetish is conceptual like flesh merging or absorption with women in a kind of flesh hive...yes, I know it's twisted and I hate it more than anything.

Imagine H.R Giger type shit.

I'm probably irreparablely psychologically damaged at this point.

FML

 

[Kurt Gödel]

Your hypothesis seems sound OP. The problem is testability but i'm sure you are pretty aware of that because we are taking about psychology.

 

[mänline]

When they are obsessions, they are demonic I think. I believe in scripture and so in the unseen spiritual world.

 

[MENSA_IQcel]

I see you're an MMT advocate?

I don't really think that the gulf between MMT and mainstream macroeconomics is really as big as some academics make it out to be, and as a politicalsciencecel, I'm somewhat more concerned about the policy implications of MMT, which essentially boils down to "let fiscal policy take care of everything".

Mainstream economics is essentially MMT with a few extra steps. If deficits are financed with treasury bonds and the FED buys up those bonds there really is no difference between that and printing money.

I am a bit scared if the plebs get hold of MMT too because they won't understand it in its entirety and demand too many "gibs"

I agreed with much of your post until the last paragraph.

1. Not everyone wants offspring. It is not unhealthy to not want crotch goblins.

2. Who are you to say that "coping mechanisms" are unhealthy? Do you believe that psychological repression of painful and embarrassing memories are inherently unhealthy?

If you did read into much of Brandon and Rand's philosophy you would understand that rational egoism is a cornerstone of Objectivism -- i.e. the principle that acting in one's self-interest is strictly moral and rational. If "coping mechanisms" are integral to one's self-interest, you would logically conclude that "coping" is moral and rational. By extension, this would constitute a moral justification for being a cuck, a faggot, or a tranny, and would be the antithesis of our community's values.

You do make a good point about coping mechanisms not necessarily being unhappy, you are wrong that Ayn Rand would be ok with them. Ayn Rand's whole philosophy was centered on the idea that rationalism is good, any form of untruth is an evil in and of itself. Ayn Rand was not a believer in the "noble lie".

What about surreal fetishes? My fetish is conceptual like flesh merging or absorption with women in a kind of flesh hive...yes, I know it's twisted and I hate it more than anything.

Imagine H.R Giger type shit.

I'm probably irreparablely psychologically damaged at this point.

FML

I have no idea tbh. Could just be a chemical imbalance.