Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

A Poll Recently found that Male Gen Z high schoolers have grown significantly more conservative

A6C8A31E 0AA5 4ED0 AABD 542170CB3C88

Up is lib down is con red female blue male

Men are becoming extreme
 
Foids should stay out of politics, they don't know what their doing or what their talking about.
 
Men are starting to wake up. Even the normie men are becoming more blackpilled, or at least not blue pill.

Guys like fresh and fit, andrew tate, hamza whilst grifters, they're blowing up, because men realize "Women are hypergamous", "Women only go for the top 10% of men, ie. the chads", women are emotional, vain, and narcissistic, the dating market is hyper-imbalanced.

So it makes total sense why men are becoming more conservative, and less blue pilled.

If I wasn't a sub5, I would probably be a redpilled normie.

But even the red pill doesn't work for sub5s.

The red pill only is a transitioner from the blue pill to the blackpill if you're a sub5.
 
View attachment 1177823
Up is lib down is con red female blue male

Men are becoming extreme

Toilets just always follow the mainstream, and as the mainstream is very much extremely gynocentric and supports toilets to get any and all benefits over any male, then it's obvious that they all support the "free" market because this "free" market somehow only ever works in their favour.
 
Men are starting to wake up. Even the normie men are becoming more blackpilled, or at least not blue pill.

Guys like fresh and fit, andrew tate, hamza whilst grifters, they're blowing up, because men realize "Women are hypergamous", "Women only go for the top 10% of men, ie. the chads", women are emotional, vain, and narcissistic, the dating market is hyper-imbalanced.

So it makes total sense why men are becoming more conservative, and less blue pilled.

If I wasn't a sub5, I would probably be a redpilled normie.

But even the red pill doesn't work for sub5s.

The red pill only is a transitioner from the blue pill to the blackpill if you're a sub5.

The vast majority of men are priced out of the market because toilets artificially are given more status. This is also why only poor toilets and rich toilets still have kids, poor toilets can easily find a man higher status than them, rich toilets are surrounded by the best men (funnily enough, rich and intelligent toilets are the only ones who identify as "100% heterosexual" when they are polled), and middle class toilets are all told that they deserve the top men.
 
Toilets just always follow the mainstream, and as the mainstream is very much extremely gynocentric and supports toilets to get any and all benefits over any male, then it's obvious that they all support the "free" market because this "free" market somehow only ever works in their favour.
:yes: :yes: :yes:
 
German teenagers also like AFD especially men.

Only women still vote green.
 
This thread is redpill not blackpill. The "top men" are that way because of aesthetic genetics, not money and status. The latter is promoted by grifters on ad sponsored platforms trying to get incels to buy a watch and car.
 
The vast majority of men are priced out of the market because toilets artificially are given more status. This is also why only poor toilets and rich toilets still have kids, poor toilets can easily find a man higher status than them, rich toilets are surrounded by the best men (funnily enough, rich and intelligent toilets are the only ones who identify as "100% heterosexual" when they are polled), and middle class toilets are all told that they deserve the top men.
True, women control the dating market.

Even if you're a 2/10 woman in terms of looks, can't cook, fat, overweight, you still hold the leverage, because there will be 6 - 7/10 men wanting you, but they'll still go to chad.

If women wanted to be fair, they would exclusively go for their looksmatch.

What it should have been
F --- M
1 <--> 1
2 <--> 2
3 <--> 3
4 <--> 4
5 <--> 5
6 <--> 6
7 <--> 7
8 <--> 8
9 <--> 9
10 <--> 10

1/10 women go for 1/10 men, 2/10 women go for 2/10 men, .... 6/10 women go for 6/10 men, etc.

But what actually happened was:

1/10 women go for 6/10 men,
2/10 to 6/10 women go for the chads but will settle with a 5 - 6/10 man to be a betabux.
and 8/10's and above only for for the millionaire, chiseled jawline, gigachads.

Incels wouldn't even be a thing if women lowered their ego and went for their looksmax, but an ugly woman wants an average guy and wouldn't settle for an ugly man.
 
True, women control the dating market.

Even if you're a 2/10 woman in terms of looks, can't cook, fat, overweight, you still hold the leverage, because there will be 6 - 7/10 men wanting you, but they'll still go to chad.

If women wanted to be fair, they would exclusively go for their looksmatch.

What it should have been
F --- M
1 <--> 1
2 <--> 2
3 <--> 3
4 <--> 4
5 <--> 5
6 <--> 6
7 <--> 7
8 <--> 8
9 <--> 9
10 <--> 10

1/10 women go for 1/10 men, 2/10 women go for 2/10 men, .... 6/10 women go for 6/10 men, etc.

But what actually happened was:

1/10 women go for 6/10 men,
2/10 to 6/10 women go for the chads but will settle with a 5 - 6/10 man to be a betabux.
and 8/10's and above only for for the millionaire, chiseled jawline, gigachads.

Incels wouldn't even be a thing if women lowered their ego and went for their looksmax, but an ugly woman wants an average guy and wouldn't settle for an ugly man.
this + male:100female ratio
 

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top