Blackpill a medival Incel had 100x more chances of get a w0men from all over the globe, compared to todays Chadlites, Normies and Incels

[Gott _mit _uns94]

A medival Incel from any nationlity, socio economic level or social class, had more chances then get a w0men then all of us here in the modren era with social networks and technology(How Ironic is that).

It didn't even matter what race you were or if w0men were attracted to you, since society back then didn't focus on sexual attrection and hack even romance and dating wasn't a thing. Romance and dating came in the romantic era doring the atheistic renaissance, where the groundwork for todays broken dating system was put. Before the romantic movement, nobody gave a damnn about w0mens attrection or what they feel.

This brings me to the other point man had soo many option for getting w0men, for example arranged marrige, since society didn't focus on lookism being succesful and doing good for society actually helped you getting w0men above your looks.

And even if there was a situation where you didn't have enough w0men or you were undisirable, you could always band toghter with your bodies and become a pirate or a raider. The mongols did it, the arabs did it, the turks did, Europeans too to an extent.

Also slavery(In the elder scrolls skyrim) was a thing.

The only man who were Incels, were either volcels (Aka monks for religious reason, some knights for same reasons as well), or were severly crippled or died before the could find a w0men.

 

[Robb97]

And they only had to live like 27 years on average. Where as nowadays we have to live 100 years of pain and suffering.

 

[Gott _mit _uns94]

And they only had to live like 27 years on average. Where as nowadays we have to live 100 years of pain and suffering.

Cope, many lived above that age. Another lie of ((Society)) to make this shitshow look better.

 

[Robb97]

Cope, many lived above that age. Another lie of ((Society)) to make this shitshow look better.

On average it's probably true, although it might be skewed by all the deaths in early childhood. Where do you find good sources to read about history?

 

[Gott _mit _uns94]

On average it's probably true, although it might be skewed by all the deaths in early childhood. Where do you find good sources to read about history?

I mostly read archiological finding, where you can see that many lived to old age, and even were much healthier then we were.

For example in one finding, they found that the germanic warriors had much stronger and cleaner teeth then the avarge person today.

Even their skulls have more T then the avarge male today.

 

[Robb97]

I mostly read archiological finding, where you can see that many lived to old age, and even were much healthier then we were.

For example in one finding, they found that the germanic warriors had much stronger and cleaner teeth then the avarge person today.

Even their skulls have more T then the avarge male today.

Germanic tribes were before the medieval ages though. The average height and age at death dropped significantly in europe during the medieval age.

 

[Gott _mit _uns94]

Germanic tribes were before the medieval ages though. The average height and age at death dropped significantly in europe after that.

Saw medival ones as well, a norse knight. Mogs us from Vallhala or haven if he was christian.

About history, I read diffrent sources from diffrent historians, I look at archiological data and make my own conclusion.

But everything you read about history you need to take with a grain of sult, since much of it is baised espcially today.

 

[Robb97]

Saw medival ones as well, a norse knight. Mogs us from Vallhala or haven if he was christian.

About history, I read diffrent sources from diffrent historians, I look at archiological data and make my own conclusion.

But everything you read about history you need to take with a grain of sult, since much of it is baised espcially today.

I guess the key is to read a lot of different sources, and whenever possible to look at the original scriptures, artifacts, drawings and such. Then come to your own conclusions. Sounds like it takes a lot of effort to study history in an objective way

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

you are partly right.

It was much easier back then, but it was because of the sex ratios heavily favouring men.

Women were still lookist af. Just look at @tamilpoet ‘s brutal post about a whore calling a dude a manlet thousands of years ago.

 

[Gott _mit _uns94]

you are partly right.

It was much easier back then, but it was because of the sex ratios heavily favouring men.

Women were still lookist af. Just look at @tamilpoet ‘s brutal post about a whore calling a dude a manlet thousands of years ago.

Thing is man did whatever they wanted and cared little for those comment.

Today man are sheckled.

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

Thing is man did whatever they wanted and cared little for those comment.

Today man are sheckled.

Men care now because women have more choices. In the past there were way more women than men, and technology wasn’t advanced enough for it to compensate for most of women’s weaknesses.

 

[Gott _mit _uns94]

Men care now because women have more choices. In the past there were way more women than men, and technology wasn’t advanced enough for it to compensate for most of women’s weaknesses.

Depends on the era. The romans didn't have enough w0men in their early days, and no w0men wanted them. Went and pillage.

The vikings(Norse pirates) were in the same situation, didn't have enough land and w0men, had to pillage.

Back then you had more options then today, even when societys were more polgymous pre-christianity.

 

[eldercelder]

But everything you read about history you need to take with a grain of sult, since much of it is baised espcially today.

Historians favor the Chad of yesteryear. For every perfect specimen Viking warrior, there are 100s of sickly people who just rot in the ground.

 

[Julaybib]

water is wet

 

[Trec]

And they only had to live like 27 years on average. Where as nowadays we have to live 100 years of pain and suffering.

Nah just that the people who died in infancy brought the median age down. If you survived past Infancy you'd be alright

 

[Gott _mit _uns94]

Nah just that the people who died in infancy brought the median age down. If you survived past Infancy you'd be alright

People were actually more healthy back then.

Look at the skulls and the clean teeth humans had, teeth is a big indicator of general health.

Humans ate fresh food, compared to the plastic and chimincal we have today, no wonder we have low T, since we are sorrunded by estrogen.

 

[Adûnâi]

That's not "medieval", that's simply pre-industrial. It just so happened that the steam engine put the inherent feminist cuckoldry in Yeshua's teaching into overdrive, and now you have literal trans lesbians are lesbians shit.

Look at the skulls and the clean teeth humans had, teeth is a big indicator of general health.

Wait, you're retarded. The Swedes in the 18th century were 10 cm shorter than nowadays. It's a huge cope that modern food is bad. Food back then didn't exist. People lived in perpetual Holodomor, died to smallpox... But at least had poon.

 

[deleted fren]

Cope.

 

[Trec]

People were actually more healthy back then.

Look at the skulls and the clean teeth humans had, teeth is a big indicator of general health.

Humans ate fresh food, compared to the plastic and chimincal we have today, no wonder we have low T, since we are sorrunded by estrogen.

Us subhumans are subhuman partially because we were fed a bad diet as kids