Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill A man's value in society is directly correlated with the number of sex partners he has had.

We all know that women always go for the men society values the most, the wealthy, the famous etc. If given the choice between 2 men, the woman would always pick the one that has more value in society.

That being said, when given the option between a virgin and a non-virgin male, women disproportionately pick the non-virgin male, indicating that the virgin male has less value in society. This could lead one to the conclusion that the number of sex partners a man has is a good indicator of his value in society as you always see women flocking to "fuckboys".



But that's easy to lie about
 
"the deduction that virgin worship is of male, not female origin. A man demands chastity in himself and others, most of all from the being he loves ; a woman wants the man with most experience and sensuality, not virtue. Woman has no comprehension of paragons. On the contrary, it is well known that a woman is most ready to fly to the arms of the man with the widest reputation for being a Don Juan. Woman requires man to be sexual, because she only gains existence through his sexuality."

This is was written 115 years. Nothing haven't changed since then, fundamentally...
 
Eh maybe this is the way women psychologically percieve it but the reality is that many fuckboys are dumbos that don't contribute shit to society and many people that have changed the human race for the better, especially scientists (e.g. Nikolai Tesla, Sir Issac Newton) become Incels even though they should be swimming in pussy if women chose men based on merit.

The reality is women look for physical attractiveness and mental stability, not intelligence or contribution to society.
Sure, powerful famous people (Leaders and kings) can get a lot of pussy but these people really aren't all that intelligent and arguably don't contribute that much to humanity in the grand scheme of things and notice the selfless intellectuals always end up barely getting any pussy.
 
Overthinking this is absurd, seeing it as obvious is correct. The only way an ugly fuck could obtain a high lay count is if became a successful rapist, which wouldn't affect his chances of getting sex honestly, and attractive guys will naturally have a high lay count. Chad isn't Chad because he has a high lay count, he has a high lay count because he's Chad. It's all genetic, not gained
 
And all of those things become invalidated as soon as people find out you're a virgin. No one takes male virgins seriously.
No, I mean if I gained 10 billion dollars for some invention I would be taken more seriously then if I fucked a party roastie
 
Firt 20 secs. and foids have alrady teehee'd
 
I have a headache from watching this obnoxious british guy. The video itself shows that most women prefer to judge men in case by case basis. So being a virgin isn't as important if you have other good qualities. As for the women who say a definite 'no' to that, I wouldn't want to date them either
Cope
 

Similar threads

ParasiteToSociety
Replies
12
Views
232
JustanotherKanga
J
SociallyStupid
Replies
4
Views
318
WorthlessSlavicShit
WorthlessSlavicShit
stranger
Replies
9
Views
360
littlemanhikicel
littlemanhikicel

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top