The cohort which grew up in a reality lacking scarcity, with plentiful withdrawal mechanisms and little external pressure is not 'alive' in any sense.
The internal reality which such a condition creates is one lacking sentiment, the sole thing which differentiates a human from a machine.
If your prerogatives and hatred isn't vivid and felt in a tangible sensory manner, you aren't experiencing the human condition.
ER and Cho illustrate two distinct forms of sentiment - a privileged, externalized one and a disadvantaged, internalized one.
ER was a witness to the thriving, unconstrained human condition in which he couldn't participate - it developed true, deep-seated hatred.
Cho was ostracized and ridiculed to the extent of total delusion - his sentiment was no less poignant.
Friction, no matter its origin, creates the internal reality.
A large amount of disenfranchised young men today were endued with life to begin with.
The internal reality which such a condition creates is one lacking sentiment, the sole thing which differentiates a human from a machine.
If your prerogatives and hatred isn't vivid and felt in a tangible sensory manner, you aren't experiencing the human condition.
ER and Cho illustrate two distinct forms of sentiment - a privileged, externalized one and a disadvantaged, internalized one.
ER was a witness to the thriving, unconstrained human condition in which he couldn't participate - it developed true, deep-seated hatred.
Cho was ostracized and ridiculed to the extent of total delusion - his sentiment was no less poignant.
Friction, no matter its origin, creates the internal reality.
A large amount of disenfranchised young men today were endued with life to begin with.
