View: https://old.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/14lvk2y/a_large_dog_is_freedom/
Jfl, you can't make this shit up, brutal dogpill in open sight
View: https://old.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/14lvk2y/a_large_dog_is_freedom/
Jfl, you can't make this shit up, brutal dogpill in open sight
N
"that big black dog"
what the hell, who talks like that about their dog
she was probably thinking about her dog's "BBC"
what the hell, who talks like that about their dog
she was probably thinking about her dog's "BBC"
she use the dog for protection at the middle of the day and then use it as a fuck toy at night, average life style of a white woman.
BBD is even more supreme than the BBC theory
BBD is even more supreme than the BBC theory
Dogpilled again.
dogged.com"that big black dog"
what the hell, who talks like that about their dog
she was probably thinking about her dog's "BBC"
caucusoid musings
What struck me the most about this post was the feminist horoscope-science. She refers to the dog as "she" for one thing. But dogpill aside, what really stood out to me was this:
Yikes, let's unpack this:
I think he was drunk (quality with objective markers like slurring speech, drunk facial expression, walking unsteadily, smell of alcohol if he got close enough, by all means something you can have some degree of certainty about)
I KNOW he had bad intentions (quality that, based on the info given in this case, is completely internal to the other person and unknown to her, for example he was not described as brandishing a knife, speaking menacingly, or even as having a hostile facial expression).
So of the two ways she described this person:
- She thinks he was the knowable quality
- She knows he was the unknowable quality (the one she can only think he is but not know)
1.2 thousand heckin updoots for "me see man. Man bad."
Yikes, let's unpack this:
I think he was drunk (quality with objective markers like slurring speech, drunk facial expression, walking unsteadily, smell of alcohol if he got close enough, by all means something you can have some degree of certainty about)
I KNOW he had bad intentions (quality that, based on the info given in this case, is completely internal to the other person and unknown to her, for example he was not described as brandishing a knife, speaking menacingly, or even as having a hostile facial expression).
So of the two ways she described this person:
- She thinks he was the knowable quality
- She knows he was the unknowable quality (the one she can only think he is but not know)
1.2 thousand heckin updoots for "me see man. Man bad."
Enjoy the larp.
Women who fuck dogs, should be hanged.
Similar threads
PhineasSpear
AtrociousCitizen
Users who are viewing this thread
