Serious A foid wrote this book. Do you support her?

[wereq]

In recent years, scientists like Kathryn Paige Harden have shown that DNA makes us different, in our personalities and in our health―and in ways that matter for educational and economic success in our current society.

In The Genetic Lottery, Harden introduces readers to the latest genetic science, dismantling dangerous ideas about racial superiority and challenging us to grapple with what equality really means in a world where people are born different. Weaving together personal stories with scientific evidence, Harden shows why our refusal to recognize the power of DNA perpetuates the myth of meritocracy, and argues that we must acknowledge the role of genetic luck if we are ever to create a fair society.

Reclaiming genetic science from the legacy of eugenics, this groundbreaking book offers a bold new vision of society where everyone thrives, regardless of how one fares in the genetic lottery.

This is her:

 

[wereq]

@DarkStar

 

[gymletethnicel]

No, women are retarded so I will not read their drivel.

 

[Diddy]

So who was the male that wrote it for her?

 

[Skelly]

no

 

[Skelly]

No, women are retarded so I will not read their drivel.

 

[Mecoja]

If I'm being honest I don't care for her, her book or her opinions and research. My life is already ruined and has almost expired, what use I have from it. I need a wondrous miracle to be able to change anything in my life. Thats why I rely on God and hope for better.

 

[Koomersarj]

dismantling dangerous ideas about racial superiority

Lol no

 

[Koomersarj]

Lol no

Funny how she's comfortable acknowledging genetic differences on an individual level but not the fact that there are average differences between genetic clusters of people. Typical Soyentific coomunity shit

 

[GrandWizard_137]

This is the same type of whore who would say "No, sweaty. It's not your looks determined by genes! You're pERsonality is the issue here, inkwell!"

 

[Rapistcel]

View attachment 1420707

In recent years, scientists like Kathryn Paige Harden have shown that DNA makes us different, in our personalities and in our health―and in ways that matter for educational and economic success in our current society.

In The Genetic Lottery, Harden introduces readers to the latest genetic science, dismantling dangerous ideas about racial superiority and challenging us to grapple with what equality really means in a world where people are born different. Weaving together personal stories with scientific evidence, Harden shows why our refusal to recognize the power of DNA perpetuates the myth of meritocracy, and argues that we must acknowledge the role of genetic luck if we are ever to create a fair society.

Reclaiming genetic science from the legacy of eugenics, this groundbreaking book offers a bold new vision of society where everyone thrives, regardless of how one fares in the genetic lottery.

This is her:
View attachment 1420708View attachment 1420710

No

 

[justuseless]

Wanna fuck her guts out

Is the book any good?

 

[Kourageous Kanga]

Harden shows why our refusal to recognize the power of DNA perpetuates the myth of meritocracy, and argues that we must acknowledge the role of genetic luck if we are ever to create a fair society.

so basically "it was over when you were born"? that sounds very familiar

 

[Koomersarj]

Tbh, though, I'd only ever have fool saaport for a foid if she's honest and self-aware about her sex's nature in a genuine way, like you and I are about that of curries. Obviously not some Pearl Davis-esque grifter type – more like someone such as Esther Vilar

 

[wereq]

Funny how she's comfortable acknowledging genetic differences on an individual level but not the fact that there are average differences between genetic clusters of people. Typical Soyentific coomunity shit

I think she knows that selling this won't work if its pushed along racial lines because it'll be immediately discarded as Nazi-era trash. She wrote this piece here, attempting to persuade the scientific community to reclaim eugenics from evil Nazi men. Obviously she's a leftoid feminist, but this approach isn't wrong in my opinion because we need to discard our shackles of ethics fast given how quickly our society is degrading.

What do we do with the science of terrible men? | Aeon Essays

The pioneers of social genetics were racists and eugenicists: should we give up on the science they founded altogether?

aeon.co

 

[SmhChan]

I'd support her if she throated my BIC.

 

[wereq]

Tbh, though, I'd only ever have fool saaport for a foid if she's honest and self-aware about her sex's nature in a genuine way, like you and I are about that of curries. Obviously not some Pearl Davis-esque grifter type – more like someone such as Esther Vilar

The problem with us on the dissident right is that we're uncompromising purists due to our autism. Not shaming us, but this fundamentalism is a handicap. What we need to realize is that we're going to shift the overton window slowly not rapidly. Rapid mass adoption is more likely to fail than not.

 

[wereq]

I'd support her if she throated my BIC.

She should promote the blackpill and eugenics while also serving as a dutiful and hard working sex slave for us incels.

 

[Castizo O' Toole]

In The Genetic Lottery, Harden introduces readers to the latest genetic science, dismantling dangerous ideas about racial superiority and challenging us to grapple with what equality really means in a world where people are born different. Weaving together personal stories with scientific evidence, Harden shows why our refusal to recognize the power of DNA perpetuates the myth of meritocracy, and argues that we must acknowledge the role of genetic luck if we are ever to create a fair society.

Reclaiming genetic science from the legacy of eugenics, this groundbreaking book offers a bold new vision of society where everyone thrives, regardless of how one fares in the genetic lottery.

DNR this book but it sounds like watER. That last line lost me; "reclaiming genetic science from the legacy of eugenics." Its because of years of academia treating the Third Reich like the boogeymen of the 21st century led to normies associating ANYTHING the Nazis did with pure evil. We're so fucking desperate for ANYONE to acknowledge genetic determinism in the 21st century that this book is the only bone thrown our way. I would hope this toilet's book would get the message across to more normies but God knows they don't fucking read or think about anything past a surface level.

 

[WorthlessSlavicShit]

dismantling dangerous ideas about racial superiority

Lol no

I had a good chuckle at the review of her book on AmRen.

However, Prof. Harden applies this understanding only to people of the same race, adding the extraordinary claim that “there is zero evidence that genetics explains racial differences in outcomes like education.” She writes:

We cannot and should not expect GWAS results to be “portable” across genetic ancestries. What you discover in one group isn’t expected to apply to another group, and if you study a different group, you might discover different genes. This expectation is clearly borne out by the data. Looking across a diverse set of phenotypes, polygenetic indices based on analyses of European ancestry populations are less strongly related to phenotypes measured in other populations, particularly African ancestry groups.

I will take Prof. Harden’s word for how the data shake out, but it doesn’t support her claim about genes and education outcomes. First, if polygenic scores that predict outcomes for whites don’t predict them for blacks (or predict them less accurately), doesn’t that suggest important racial differences?"

How to Reconcile Egalitarianism with Genetic Reality - American Renaissance

One scholar's attempt.

www.amren.com

 

[The Scarlet Prince]

No. I hate women.

 

[wereq]

We're so fucking desperate for ANYONE to acknowledge genetic determinism in the 21st century that this book is the only bone thrown our way.

Yes this is exactly what I was telling @Koomersarj, We are against a tremendous barrier and so our gains can only be slow and incremental.

 

[SmhChan]

The problem with us on the dissident right is that we're uncompromising purists due to our autism. Not shaming us, but this fundamentalism is a handicap. What we need to realize is that we're going to shift the overton window slowly not rapidly. Rapid mass adoption is more likely to fail than not.

But the problem with a slow approach is that if foids and simps sensed a slow change, they'd promptly pull the window back given their social dominance. We do need a radical and unapologetically 'oppressive' change overnight. After that, the newfound societal rules and moralities can be slowly established.

 

[LWii]

View attachment 1420707

In recent years, scientists like Kathryn Paige Harden have shown that DNA makes us different, in our personalities and in our health―and in ways that matter for educational and economic success in our current society.

In The Genetic Lottery, Harden introduces readers to the latest genetic science, dismantling dangerous ideas about racial superiority and challenging us to grapple with what equality really means in a world where people are born different. Weaving together personal stories with scientific evidence, Harden shows why our refusal to recognize the power of DNA perpetuates the myth of meritocracy, and argues that we must acknowledge the role of genetic luck if we are ever to create a fair society.

Reclaiming genetic science from the legacy of eugenics, this groundbreaking book offers a bold new vision of society where everyone thrives, regardless of how one fares in the genetic lottery.

This is her:
View attachment 1420708View attachment 1420710

From that description, it sounds like the book just says: "yeah incels are right about everything but theyre still morally wrong" or something like that
Might still read it idk

 

[LWii]

Being incels doesnt makes us "rightwing"

 

[wereq]

We're so fucking desperate for ANYONE to acknowledge genetic determinism in the 21st century that this book is the only bone thrown our way.

No. I hate women.

Maybe we can use the face of a leftist feminist foid to sanitize the blackpill and biological determinism.

 

[twisted]

people will only care when a toilet brings these kind of problems to light

 

[wereq]

From that description, it sounds like the book just says: "yeah incels are right about everything but theyre still morally wrong" or something like that

EXACTLY! They are telling us that we're right without directly telling us that we're right because that would be too much validation for the unsanctioned views of pariahs like us!

 

[wereq]

people will only care when a toilet brings these kind of problems to light

Which is why we must make use of foids to advance our causes.

 

[wereq]

Being incels doesnt makes us "rightwing"

We are Nazbol mostly. Socially conservative (foids without rights) but economically leftist (NEETbux).

 

[coping_manlet]

Oh boy, a self aware foid!

Did her self awareness allow her to break away from the foid hivemind and exhibit unique behavior?

No??? Then she can rot with the rest of the foids in the gas chambers!!!!

 

[Castizo O' Toole]

Maybe we can use the face of a leftist feminist foid to sanitize the blackpill and biological determinism.

The best we're gonna get for now is a blue-dog dem like Shoe0nHead acknowledging male loneliness

 

[wereq]

The best we're gonna get for now is a blue-dog dem like Shoe0nHead acknowledging male loneliness

68000 upvotes on this comment! Absolutely over for men!

 

[DarkStar]

I would be willing to give it somewhat of a read, but it seems as if she's trying to subvert the blackpill in a way which is what I have feared.

Foids will look at something & then find a way to twist it into their own "narrative" which ofc amounts to finding ways to make themselves appear as victims & males as oppressors, despite this narrative having been disproven by statistics, historical accounts, and simply just observing things as is

Funny how she's comfortable acknowledging genetic differences on an individual level but not the fact that there are average differences between genetic clusters of people. Typical Soyentific coomunity shit

Exactly, especially when various populations share a lot of genes, alleles, SNPs, etc.

I think she knows that selling this won't work if its pushed along racial lines because it'll be immediately discarded as Nazi-era trash. She wrote this piece here, attempting to persuade the scientific community to reclaim eugenics from evil Nazi men. Obviously she's a leftoid feminist, but this approach isn't wrong in my opinion because we need to discard our shackles of ethics fast given how quickly our society is degrading.

What do we do with the science of terrible men? | Aeon Essays

The pioneers of social genetics were racists and eugenicists: should we give up on the science they founded altogether?

aeon.co

Ethics & morals are not bad per-say, its just the current ones we have really are not that "ethical" or "moral" when it comes down to it

 

[wereq]

Exactly, especially when various populations share a lot of genes, alleles, SNPs, etc.

You should've studied microbiology, genetics, biotechnology, and bioinformatics. This is your true calling.

 

[LWii]

We are Nazbol mostly. Socially conservative (foids without rights) but economically leftist (NEETbux).

Yeah i mostly agree but i think we should refer to ourselves as "rightwing"
I dont want to be associated with capitalists and cuckservative retards

 

[wereq]

Ethics & morals are not bad per-say, its just the current ones we have really are not that "ethical" or "moral" when it comes down to it

Of course the current set of woke/slave morality-based ethical guidelines are wrong, that's besides the point. The point is that these current ones aren't just going away. They're not going to be rapidly discarded. There needs to be a persuasion and shifting of the overton window over the course of 5 to 15 years.

 

[wereq]

I dont want to be associated with capitalists and cuckservative retards

 

[TooSomething]

"dismantling dangerous ideas about racial superiority"

Nope.avi

 

[Yabadadabadoo]

No but I would ascend with her

 

[DarkStar]

Yeah i mostly agree but i think we should refer to ourselves as "rightwing"
I dont want to be associated with capitalists and cuckservative retards

Yeah no I agree, we should just consider ourselves third position

 

[DarkStar]

"dismantling dangerous ideas about racial superiority"

Nope.avi

White Liberal foids & ethnics on .is both love denying race

 

[Grodd]

No, women are retarded so I will not read their drivel.

 

[DeathSigil]

View attachment 1420707

In recent years, scientists like Kathryn Paige Harden have shown that DNA makes us different, in our personalities and in our health―and in ways that matter for educational and economic success in our current society.

In The Genetic Lottery, Harden introduces readers to the latest genetic science, dismantling dangerous ideas about racial superiority and challenging us to grapple with what equality really means in a world where people are born different. Weaving together personal stories with scientific evidence, Harden shows why our refusal to recognize the power of DNA perpetuates the myth of meritocracy, and argues that we must acknowledge the role of genetic luck if we are ever to create a fair society.

Reclaiming genetic science from the legacy of eugenics, this groundbreaking book offers a bold new vision of society where everyone thrives, regardless of how one fares in the genetic lottery.

This is her:
View attachment 1420708View attachment 1420710

Well no respect gor her but you can still hate someone's guts and still use their work in arguments.

If the book is truly BP It would be a gem in certain arguments with foids.

 

[blackpillednigga]

So who was the male that wrote it for her?

 

[blackpillednigga]

dnr I already know its not gonna be male-centric and will use neutral language

 

[NIGGER BOJANGLES]

No but I would ascend with her