bodhisattvacel
The Path to Enlightenment
★
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2021
- Posts
- 63
It's fair to say that the war between height and face is one of the most dividing problems in the community. I believe that the way we are approaching the discussion is a major issue however.
A common comparison is, for example, would you rather be 6'3 or Chad? This assumes that being 6'3 is the height equivalent of having a Chad face, and this is where the flaw comes in. When was the last time you saw a true, real Chad? To me they are unironically 1 in maybe 200 or 300, whereas 6'3 dudes are more like 1 in 50 or so. The problem is that 6'3 is Chadlite at best.
Furthermore, Chad only exists with height. There are many, many incel lanklets, however no Chadlet incels. How come? I believe this is because Chadlets do not exist. Have you ever seen a 5'6 Chad? I haven't, however if you look at many short guys they actually do have Chad faces but they absolutely don't register as chad due to their height.
Putting these 2 things together, being Chad is more valuable than being 6'3+, however if one is short then one is no longer Chad, thus nullifying it's value. Essentially the debate is a paradox as both aspects are essential for the function of the other (although I would argue being tall alone can get you further). Chad is the full package, the debate is simply cope
A common comparison is, for example, would you rather be 6'3 or Chad? This assumes that being 6'3 is the height equivalent of having a Chad face, and this is where the flaw comes in. When was the last time you saw a true, real Chad? To me they are unironically 1 in maybe 200 or 300, whereas 6'3 dudes are more like 1 in 50 or so. The problem is that 6'3 is Chadlite at best.
Furthermore, Chad only exists with height. There are many, many incel lanklets, however no Chadlet incels. How come? I believe this is because Chadlets do not exist. Have you ever seen a 5'6 Chad? I haven't, however if you look at many short guys they actually do have Chad faces but they absolutely don't register as chad due to their height.
Putting these 2 things together, being Chad is more valuable than being 6'3+, however if one is short then one is no longer Chad, thus nullifying it's value. Essentially the debate is a paradox as both aspects are essential for the function of the other (although I would argue being tall alone can get you further). Chad is the full package, the debate is simply cope