Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

JFL A critique of patriarchy from an incel perspective

Lv99_BixNood

Lv99_BixNood

fascel
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 19, 2017
Posts
24,314
Online time
5d 1h

View: https://old.reddit.com/r/socialism/comments/1to3phl/a_critique_of_patriarchy_from_an_incel_perspective/


And if we cannot overcome the male hierarchy and prevent this discrimination against LGBT identities, and if we cannot free people from the absurd norms imposed by social media that categorize people simply based on a few jawbones and arm muscles—like "This one is more masculine, this one is more feminine" or "This boy is sub5, this boy is HTN, this boy is Chad"—then, we cannot prevent school shootings or the massacres against women. What matters is not the games people play or the movies they watch, but the things that lead them towards toxic masculinity.

Just dismantle the patriarchy bro :soy:
 
The patriarchy has been dismantled already
 
Also when did socialism become about faggots and wahmen instead of about dispossessing the rich?
 
JFL at thinking that the "patriarchy" is what causes inkwells. It's called sexual selection. Although I've seen some brocels argue that it's artificial due to things like dating apps, women being able to work, etc.
 
Last edited:
Patriarchy is the misleading front of matriarchy/gynocracy.
 
WE HAVE TO END FEMINISM AND ABOLISH WOMEN'S RIGHTS
 
I remember a old BP vid, I think it was a rehab room one, where he makes the point that these failed normies see chad in his mansion and think “Woah all this wealth is why women love him!!!” and seek to rid the world of this perceived imbalance. But fail to realise that even when the playing field is socially evened they still have the natural advantage.
 
"if we cannot free people from the absurd norms imposed by social media that categorize people simply based on a few jawbones and arm muscles—" those norms aren't imposed by social media you fucking idiot, they are imposed by your human brain, because looks are objective, the sense of beauty is innate and hardwired in humans.
 
removed by moderator jfl
 
Around the 1960s.
I remember listening to a talk by Richard D. Wolff. He claimed that socialism was actually the reason why boomers enjoyed such a great economy and, consequently, a great quality of life. Slowly, it got politically associated with liberal degeneracy of whores (foids) and faggots.
 
I remember listening to a talk by Richard D. Wolff. He claimed that socialism was actually the reason why boomers enjoyed such a great economy and, consequently, a great quality of life.
Yeah. That was because of the New Deal. It was a socialist(-esque?) policy in response to the Great Depression. World War II helped it though.
 
Just dismantle the patriarchy bro :soy:
At whoms benefit? The Jews? The Communists? The Foids?
Since engels
I thought Germans were smart then this shit stain started talking.
Patriarchy is the misleading front of matriarchy/gynocracy.
Exactly feminism freed men but turned society into soyciety.
they still have the natural advantage.
Chad always wins its fuck'n LAW.
those norms aren't imposed by social media you fucking idiot, they are imposed by your human brain, because looks are objective, the sense of beauty is innate and hardwired in humans.
High IQ most members are still on that blue pill copium common on here and capping.
I remember listening to a talk by Richard D. Wolff. He claimed that socialism was actually the reason why boomers enjoyed such a great economy and, consequently, a great quality of life. Slowly, it got politically associated with liberal degeneracy of whores (foids) and faggots.
True socialism isn't about seizing reproduction or whatever retard shit conservatives spouting:
It has lots of social programs,
Worker rights,
Protectionism.
 
Also when did socialism become about faggots and wahmen instead of about dispossessing the rich?
Ever since kikes such as Herbert Marcus in the fifties and sixties and the cultural revolution in China and the Vietnam war did Marxism go from being about the first world industrialized proletariat towards including the peasant class and then it went from there to being all about every single group and identity that fit some vague intersectional definition of 'oppressed'.
 

Similar threads

TrueSubHuman
Replies
17
Views
592
Rapistcel
Rapistcel
The Death Devil
Replies
45
Views
1K
tired as fuck
tired as fuck
Cryo
Replies
38
Views
983
Buried Alive 2.0
Buried Alive 2.0

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top