A certain percentage of men not reproducing is nature's way of imposing natural selection on humans

[last_man]

But now that we live in a society where most of our survival needs are met without any effort, what determines men's fitness to breed is women's sexual preferences. Instead of the ability to survive, or the ability to extract resources, what men are being selected for is simply what women find to be attractive.

 

[Mahlo]

 

[Diablocel]

Gymcelling worked very well years upon years ago, back when if you had an ugly face you could still get a 8/10 if you were muscular because femoids didn't get to decide to not want someone for something they can't control or at least much less so

 

[Robtical]

The natural selection argument is another way of siding with degeneracy. Only 150 years ago it wasn't rare for a man to marry a virgin bride. Now because of feminism, female worship and dating apps, women artificially inflated their market value. Today they'll get pumped and dumped until they're over 40, then can't have any more kids or only be able to have autistic ones. Femoids are wiping humans out with their "natural selection" bullshit. Femoids are meant to be controlled before they fuck everything up.

 

[Deleted member 2798]

Right on. A mistake made by a lot of the smug advocates for lite eugenics ("um well pathetic people shouldn't reproduce ummm") is to assume that there is some eternal, static hierarchy of traits from which the unvarying "good ones" are always selected. Natural selection is a modular process that allows for the proliferation of traits that are advantageous for certain environments. Right now, most of us live in an overdetermined managerial technocracy where fuckin' nothing at all is required to survive. But what's required to reproduce in the fempire of modern civilization? Nothing but the approval of woman, that vulgar, stupid animal; nature's scourge.

In spite of what some masochists here might say, sexual attraction does not overlap very well with physical, and certainly not mental, quality. The sexually engineered progeny sent out into the future will grow ever weaker in body and mind, eventually to the point where they cannot maintain the structures on which they depend, whereupon they'll be swallowed whole by the elements.

 

[WarriorSkull]

The natural selection argument is another way of siding with degeneracy. Only 150 years ago it wasn't rare for a man to marry a virgin bride. Now because of feminism, female worship and dating apps, women artificially inflated their market value. Today they'll get pumped and dumped until they're over 40, then can't have any more kids or only be able to have autistic ones. Femoids are wiping humans out with their "natural selection" bullshit. Femoids are meant to be controlled before they fuck everything up.

This. Even if they manage to shit out kid during the prime breeding years, Chad never sticks around and we have yet another single mother who is almost damn near garunteed to fuck her kid's head up so much that they may manage to fuck up whatever advantage his genes granted them. That is assuming the mother's genes didn't fuck them up to begin with.

 

[Robtical]

This. Even if they manage to shit out kid during the prime breeding years, Chad never sticks around and we have yet another single mother who is almost damn near garunteed to fuck her kid's head up so much that they may manage to fuck up whatever advantage his genes granted them. That is assuming the mother's genes didn't fuck them up to begin with.

Exactly. If the rostie is lucky enough to be impregnated by chad, the child will be raised by a single mother, so the kid will likely become a violent thug or a super thot. Most of the time the chads don't impregnate the femoids though, the femoids just wait until their 40's to have a baby with a betabux provider. So not only will the child have the genes of the beta cuck, but it will also be from the mother's 40+ year old eggs.

 

[i_a_m_i]

 

[WillyBlogAndFriends]

Modern society reaffirmed the Pareto principle that humans managed to weaken by using scarcity of resources to equalize the value of women. However, in a society where both women and men control adequate resources, there is no equalizer therefore the Pareto principle returns to the correct ratio.

 

[Jockcel]

And women just happen to like the features that signal high quality DNA. It's over, there is no way we are faking quality DNA.

 

[Mainländer]

The Darwinian argument doesn't quite cut it nowadays. Women are not only reproducing with Chads, mostly in their prime - if that was the case, we would at least get better genetically each generation. They are instead having promiscuous sex with Chads using contraception through all their prime reproductive years and then marrying and reproducing with a genetically inferior betabuxes after 30.

Everyone loses except Chads, if you really think about it.