These days I've been thinking about books that would be worth re-reading, and I could not think of one throughout history that wasn't mostly based on bluepilled beliefs. In fact, the vast majority of philosophers and philosophical traditions are based on core bluepilled beliefs and that explains why blackpill knowledge is so scarcely spread, especially in literature.
However, I remembered Max Stirner's "The Ego and Its Own", a book I've read years ago when I was still mostly bluepilled despite not thinking so (even though I thought the insights were very insteresting and was very drawn to this book, I eventually reverted back to a search for morality and ended up not taking much interest or reflecting deeply on the work anymore).
I've decided to read it again now and I think that a lot of incels should do it if they haven't yet, it's interesting that, despite being based on a tradition of bluepilled philosophical errors, Stirner had a very deep grasp of many truly blackpilled facts that many on this forum still refuse to accept, all the while having an interesting and incel-fitting life-affirming way of dealing with the fact of being on this earth.
Incels should especially read the chapter "My Self-Enjoyment", it will help most of them understand that they are letting other people deny their own property over themselves because of "spooks" created by others that, instead of being actual/real binding standards for living, are only fake abstract notins used by other human animals in order to exert their power over others and satisfy their own ego.
These spooks include "love" (familial, intersexual, and friendly), morals, etc. You need to accept that love is not real in the social sense of the word, like a rock can always be defined in the real world, because it is an exterior experience that can be shared between two viewers (and even that could be and have been philosophically disputed). However, all "spooks" (which could basically encompass all rational beliefs related to social interaction regulation, which go beyond basic human animalistic instincts, which always prevail) are always going to be based on a false notion of a shared experience which, in fact, is not shared, it is only experienced in one's self, and only you can agree 100% with a conveived notion of love, in that way, you can only ever love yourself.
Of course, if you accept genetic determinism and reject metaphysical speculation, you will also understand that these spooks are mere reflections of what your natural composition (your body, genetics and instincts) want you as an animal to do, that is, survive and reproduce. In that sense, even if we believe we have supernatural or special bonds with other beings, in the practical sense we are all using each other for own purpose. In the same way, Stacy uses Chad's beauty for her own needs (showing status, sexual pleasure), and meanwhile uses Melvin for his resources and emotional support. A single mother will use her own son as a beta provider if necessary, a "friend" will gladly step over you if it means getting pussy. A work colleague will also gladly step over you to get a promotion and improve his own living standards. For all of this people will come up with fake moral concepts that are never actually followed, it's only to put an image that humans are civil when they are just the same animals that they were in the beginning, they just have created language and from then on tried to deny the fact that they're just animals.
Knowing all this, you as an incel should always think of yourself first and live for your own pleasure, and for your own notion of what is fair or not. You should see all humans, lovers, friends, family, colleagues and strangers as pre-determined animals (and as a blackpillers, you'll always see a pattern and realize that humans work the same way as mice, it's a simple reward/punishment dynamic, a "positive" or "negative" reinforcement, per say. This gives you a sort of confidence and higher-ground in analysing and dealing with things if you can surpass the emotional damage that can come with the shattering of hardwired bluepilled concepts about reality.
Even if your genetics do not grant you the best chances of enjoyment as Chads or Stacies, you should use your property (your body, your life, your wishes and imperatives) only to your OWN benefit. All of us are animals and in the end can only actually control and do as we please with our own property (our being), same applies to Chads and Stacies, but only a few of us will be able to have a clear gasp of what is happening in the world in a general and systematic way, in which you can base all of your actions. Women-animals are very self-centered, so they can have an accute sense of opportunities for using free goods (sex with Chad, betabux, free attention, sleeping their way up a career), but they can also be very self-destructive. Most people are. This is your challenge incel: to be more able than them to understand and redirect your urges to your own benefit ONLY and always first.
This is the game you'll always have most control over other people: your ability to do as you please.
However, I remembered Max Stirner's "The Ego and Its Own", a book I've read years ago when I was still mostly bluepilled despite not thinking so (even though I thought the insights were very insteresting and was very drawn to this book, I eventually reverted back to a search for morality and ended up not taking much interest or reflecting deeply on the work anymore).
I've decided to read it again now and I think that a lot of incels should do it if they haven't yet, it's interesting that, despite being based on a tradition of bluepilled philosophical errors, Stirner had a very deep grasp of many truly blackpilled facts that many on this forum still refuse to accept, all the while having an interesting and incel-fitting life-affirming way of dealing with the fact of being on this earth.
Incels should especially read the chapter "My Self-Enjoyment", it will help most of them understand that they are letting other people deny their own property over themselves because of "spooks" created by others that, instead of being actual/real binding standards for living, are only fake abstract notins used by other human animals in order to exert their power over others and satisfy their own ego.
These spooks include "love" (familial, intersexual, and friendly), morals, etc. You need to accept that love is not real in the social sense of the word, like a rock can always be defined in the real world, because it is an exterior experience that can be shared between two viewers (and even that could be and have been philosophically disputed). However, all "spooks" (which could basically encompass all rational beliefs related to social interaction regulation, which go beyond basic human animalistic instincts, which always prevail) are always going to be based on a false notion of a shared experience which, in fact, is not shared, it is only experienced in one's self, and only you can agree 100% with a conveived notion of love, in that way, you can only ever love yourself.
Of course, if you accept genetic determinism and reject metaphysical speculation, you will also understand that these spooks are mere reflections of what your natural composition (your body, genetics and instincts) want you as an animal to do, that is, survive and reproduce. In that sense, even if we believe we have supernatural or special bonds with other beings, in the practical sense we are all using each other for own purpose. In the same way, Stacy uses Chad's beauty for her own needs (showing status, sexual pleasure), and meanwhile uses Melvin for his resources and emotional support. A single mother will use her own son as a beta provider if necessary, a "friend" will gladly step over you if it means getting pussy. A work colleague will also gladly step over you to get a promotion and improve his own living standards. For all of this people will come up with fake moral concepts that are never actually followed, it's only to put an image that humans are civil when they are just the same animals that they were in the beginning, they just have created language and from then on tried to deny the fact that they're just animals.
Knowing all this, you as an incel should always think of yourself first and live for your own pleasure, and for your own notion of what is fair or not. You should see all humans, lovers, friends, family, colleagues and strangers as pre-determined animals (and as a blackpillers, you'll always see a pattern and realize that humans work the same way as mice, it's a simple reward/punishment dynamic, a "positive" or "negative" reinforcement, per say. This gives you a sort of confidence and higher-ground in analysing and dealing with things if you can surpass the emotional damage that can come with the shattering of hardwired bluepilled concepts about reality.
Even if your genetics do not grant you the best chances of enjoyment as Chads or Stacies, you should use your property (your body, your life, your wishes and imperatives) only to your OWN benefit. All of us are animals and in the end can only actually control and do as we please with our own property (our being), same applies to Chads and Stacies, but only a few of us will be able to have a clear gasp of what is happening in the world in a general and systematic way, in which you can base all of your actions. Women-animals are very self-centered, so they can have an accute sense of opportunities for using free goods (sex with Chad, betabux, free attention, sleeping their way up a career), but they can also be very self-destructive. Most people are. This is your challenge incel: to be more able than them to understand and redirect your urges to your own benefit ONLY and always first.
This is the game you'll always have most control over other people: your ability to do as you please.
