Blackpill A Blackpill from the 1930s

[Deleted member 33216]

I'm a big fan of George Orwell, and while reading his book Down and Out in Paris and London I came across a very harsh Blackpill. In the book, a man named Charlie was talking about his days in Paris while dealing with poverty. Anyhow, one day when Charlie was hungry he asked himself "What is the easiest way to get money without working?"

And then he proceeds to answer his own question with the following:

"To get money easily one must be a woman. Has not every woman something to sell? And then, as I lay reflecting upon the things I should do if I were a woman, an idea came to my head. I remembered the Government maternity hospitals -- you know the Government maternity hospitals? They are places where women who are enceinte are given meals for free and no questions are asked. It is done to encourage childbearing. Any woman can go there and demand a meal, and she is given it immediately"

So, as you can see boyos, even in the 1930s foids were living on tutorial mode while their male counterparts were rotting in poverty.

 

[your personality]

I'm a big fan of George Orwell, and while reading his book Down and Out in Paris and London I came across a very harsh Blackpill. In the book, a man named Charlie was talking about his days in Paris while dealing with poverty. Anyhow, one day when Charlie was hungry he asked himself "What is the easiest way to get money without working?"

And then he proceeds to answer his own question with the following:

"To get money easily one must be a woman. Has not every woman something to sell? And then, as I lay reflecting upon the things I should do if I were a woman, an idea came to my head. I remembered the Government maternity hospitals -- you know the Government maternity hospitals? They are places where women who are enceinte are given meals for free and no questions are asked. It is done to encourage childbearing. Any woman can go there and demand a meal, and she is given it immediately"

So, as you can see boyos, even in the 1930s foids were living on tutorial mode while their male counterparts were rotting in poverty.

Just Anglo Feminist things tbh

 

[Deleted member 33091]

Based GrAYcel.

Time to take the georgeorwellpill

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

Just Anglo Feminist things tbh

anglos being cucked like usual.
Even when Einstein came to America, he thought english culture was cucked.

 

[JestER]

They were still living on easy mode even before the suffragette movement

 

[fedcel]

The second great evil of a tramp’s life—it seems much smaller at first sight, but it is a good second—is that he is entirely cut off from contact with women. This point needs elaborating.

Tramps are cut off from women, in the first place, because there are very few women at their level of society. One might imagine that among destitute people the sexes would be as equally balanced as elsewhere. But it is not so; in fact, one can almost say that below a certain level society is entirely male. The following figures, published by the L.G.C. from a night census taken on February 13th, 1931, will show the relative numbers of destitute men and destitute women:

Spending the night in the streets, 60 men, 18 women.[6] In shelters and homes not licensed as common lodging-houses, 1,057 men, 137 women. In the crypt of St Martin’s-in-the-Fields Church, 88 men, 12 women. In L.C.C. casual wards and hostels, 674 men, 15 women.

It will be seen from these figures that at the charity level men outnumber women by something like ten to one. The cause is presumably that unemployment affects women less than men; also that any presentable woman can, in the last resort, attach herself to some man. The result, for a tramp, is that he is condemned to perpetual celibacy. For of course it goes without saying that if a tramp finds no women at his own level, those above—even a very little above—are as far out of his reach as the moon

 

[Deleted member 33216]

The second great evil of a tramp’s life—it seems much smaller at first sight, but it is a good second—is that he is entirely cut off from contact with women. This point needs elaborating.

Tramps are cut off from women, in the first place, because there are very few women at their level of society. One might imagine that among destitute people the sexes would be as equally balanced as elsewhere. But it is not so; in fact, one can almost say that below a certain level society is entirely male. The following figures, published by the L.G.C. from a night census taken on February 13th, 1931, will show the relative numbers of destitute men and destitute women:

​

Spending the night in the streets, 60 men, 18 women.[6] In shelters and homes not licensed as common lodging-houses, 1,057 men, 137 women. In the crypt of St Martin’s-in-the-Fields Church, 88 men, 12 women. In L.C.C. casual wards and hostels, 674 men, 15 women.

It will be seen from these figures that at the charity level men outnumber women by something like ten to one. The cause is presumably that unemployment affects women less than men; also that any presentable woman can, in the last resort, attach herself to some man. The result, for a tramp, is that he is condemned to perpetual celibacy. For of course it goes without saying that if a tramp finds no women at his own level, those above—even a very little above—are as far out of his reach as the moon

Men have always been the disposables of society, and from the looks of it we'll always be. I think the reason behind that is biological since women are the ones who take care of babies and carry them for 9 months.

Here's another notable Blackpill from the same book:

"But deeper than these there is the degradation worked in a man who knows that he is not even considered fit for marriage. The sexual impulse, not to put it any higher, is a fundamental impulse, and starvation of it can be almost as demoralizing as physical hunger. The evil of poverty is not so much that it makes a man suffer as that it rots him physically and spiritually. And there can be no doubt that sexual starvation contributes to this rotting process. Cut off from the whole race of women, a tramp feels himself degraded to the rank of a cripple or a lunatic. No humiliation could do more damage to a man’s self-respect."

 

[AlexAnguish]

^

 

[your personality]

anglos being cucked like usual.
Even when Einstein came to America, he thought english culture was cucked.

Looked that up and saw that in 1921 he did speak of how American men were "toy dogs" of American women, which many American women took offense at but American men did not and seemed proud to have enough money to spend on women. But the bluepilled betabuxxing model still worked better back then than now so less men were redpilled/blackpilled imo.

 

[Deleted member 32502]

The human species is gynocentric. Males are literal garbage. More males are born than females to make the competition fair except in poor areas so females can employ hypergamy to get out of poverty (SEA and eastern European mail-brides). Young men do all dangerous tasks and are sent to die in wars. Warfare is about stealing pussy from the losing nation. Everything serves females while males are always in a state of competition.

 

[EyesAreSoCold]

The second great evil of a tramp’s life—it seems much smaller at first sight, but it is a good second—is that he is entirely cut off from contact with women. This point needs elaborating.

Tramps are cut off from women, in the first place, because there are very few women at their level of society. One might imagine that among destitute people the sexes would be as equally balanced as elsewhere. But it is not so; in fact, one can almost say that below a certain level society is entirely male. The following figures, published by the L.G.C. from a night census taken on February 13th, 1931, will show the relative numbers of destitute men and destitute women:

​

Spending the night in the streets, 60 men, 18 women.[6] In shelters and homes not licensed as common lodging-houses, 1,057 men, 137 women. In the crypt of St Martin’s-in-the-Fields Church, 88 men, 12 women. In L.C.C. casual wards and hostels, 674 men, 15 women.

It will be seen from these figures that at the charity level men outnumber women by something like ten to one. The cause is presumably that unemployment affects women less than men; also that any presentable woman can, in the last resort, attach herself to some man. The result, for a tramp, is that he is condemned to perpetual celibacy. For of course it goes without saying that if a tramp finds no women at his own level, those above—even a very little above—are as far out of his reach as the moon

Men have always been the disposables of society, and from the looks of it we'll always be. I think the reason behind that is biological since women are the ones who take care of babies and carry them for 9 months.

Here's another notable Blackpill from the same book:

"But deeper than these there is the degradation worked in a man who knows that he is not even considered fit for marriage. The sexual impulse, not to put it any higher, is a fundamental impulse, and starvation of it can be almost as demoralizing as physical hunger. The evil of poverty is not so much that it makes a man suffer as that it rots him physically and spiritually. And there can be no doubt that sexual starvation contributes to this rotting process. Cut off from the whole race of women, a tramp feels himself degraded to the rank of a cripple or a lunatic. No humiliation could do more damage to a man’s self-respect."

Those are very good blackpills.