Which one would you rather be?
190 cm and bald.
N
Of course 6'3" and bald hair is not a pre requisite for dating
Being short is much more of a turnoff than being bald. At least tall men can look masculine.
S
Few guys can pull off being bald. In both cases it would depend on the guys face.
As seen from this forum being tall dosent mean you wont be incel.
On another forum I posted on years ago there was a 6'8 KHV.
As seen from this forum being tall dosent mean you wont be incel.
On another forum I posted on years ago there was a 6'8 KHV.
I'm 5'7 and bald. I choose height first.
Beeing short is huge disadvantage but I choose great hair cause I don't want to look like a handsome Squidward.
D
Both options suck but I'd be 5'7 with hair
I'll take being short with hair.
Hair is the biggest halo. Almost all girls with shaved heads would look like naked mole rats.
Hair is the biggest halo. Almost all girls with shaved heads would look like naked mole rats.
6'3 bald run roid and tats game
Just be tall is the truth
6'3 and bald any day
6'3 and bald
N
How is the FACE in both examples?
If my face was hideous, even though it doesn't matter much at this point, I would much rather be 5'7 with good hair than an ugly balding lanklet.
If my face was at least above average, then I would chose to be 6'3 and bald, because at that point my height and my decent face would be enough.
If my face was hideous, even though it doesn't matter much at this point, I would much rather be 5'7 with good hair than an ugly balding lanklet.
If my face was at least above average, then I would chose to be 6'3 and bald, because at that point my height and my decent face would be enough.
You can fix baldness much more easily than shortness.
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
