Yep, it's just a duct tape on a cracked foundation. Even if somehow they were basically forced to be with men and accept it, they still wouldn't be, or barely would be, attracted to the men, and this situation could easily lead back to the current scenario. Moreover, curtailing female sexuality and female choice (apart from being unfair) has only made things worse, because this way, foids have children and pass on their genes regardless of whether they are attracted to men or not, diluting even more the genetic pool that involves female to male attraction. Who knows how many dyke or Chad only whores reproduced due to this retarded system?
A natural best scenario would be that that the hypergamic whores and the pseudo dykes or dykes become a genetic dead end. To be fair, that's mostly what is already happening, although men, once again, are being retarded and allowing them to reproduce by getting a sperm donor. Either way, it would take too many generations for it to have a huge impact, and the real solution is of course genetic engineering, by making the attraction between the genders more reciprocal, instead of this unbalanced mess. Moreover, foids themselves would also benefit from this, as they aren't particularly happy with the current situation, either. And men could also be modified of course - for starters we could make men less horny because there's really nothing positive about being a horndog: it makes us weaker.
_________________________
I digress but I've read plenty of papers about sexuality, and it's actually relatively easy to influence sexual orientation, since you don't even have to directly modify genes: you can simply adjust the exposure to certain sex hormones during specific stages of fetal development, as this permanently influences brain structure and gene expression. In fact, it has been done multiple times in animals, and accidentally, in humans. To be more specific, Diethylstilbestrol (DES) is a synthetic estrogen that was given to pregnant women to prevent miscarriages and other pregnancy related complications between 1940 and early 1970s, but the drug was discontinued after it was found out that it caused several health risks, such as cancer. Among the alterations caused by the drug, however, it was discovered that the children exposed to the drug had on average a slightly different sexual orientation compared to the general population, and that the moment of exposure to the drug mattered. Consequently, the women that were exposed to it at a certain point were more likely to report being heterosexual and had higher rates of being married compared to the average, while it was the opposite for the women exposed to the drug during another time window. For the men, they all generally were less likely to report being heterosexual.
The brain is so sensible to hormone imbalances that I actually believe that endocrine disruptors, which are chemicals that interfere with the body's hormonal systems, and that can mimic, block, or alter hormone signals, actually are influencing human sexuality -among other things- to a significant degree. What's more, these chemicals are absolutely ubiquitous in modern civilization, as they are found in everyday products such as plastics, pesticides (you've probably heard about the gay frogs meme, which is actually real), cosmetics, food packaging, household cleaners, and even drinking water, so you can see that they are a very real problem. Again, there are plenty of animal studies showing that they can alter sexual behavior, even at doses lower than those once considered safe. And yes, some researchers timidly link endocrine disruptors with the rise of transgenderism and even sexual fluidity, as controversial as this is in Western Academia.
At some point I'll probably make a thread about this summarizing the most interesting info. To be clear, I don't think they've massively impacted human sexuality, but their influence could still be significant.
Last edited:
