Blackpill 4 Common Characteristics of Mass Shooters since 1960s...

[Deleted member 10124]

Nearly All Mass Shooters Since 1966 Have Had 4 Things in Common

The largest study of mass shooters ever funded by the U.S. government reveals stunning information about perpetrators.

www.vice.com

A new Department of Justice-funded study of all “mass murder” — killings of four or more people in a public place — since 1966 found that mass shooters typically have an experience with childhood trauma, a personal crisis or specific grievance, and a “script” or examples that validate their feelings or provide a roadmap. And then there’s the fourth thing: legal access to a firearm.

They’re also increasingly motivated by racial, religious, or misogynist hatred, particularly over the past five years.

But researchers said that they were particularly struck by how many mass shooters displayed symptoms of being in some sort of crisis prior to the shooting. “Those are opportunities for prevention,” said Peterson.

5 profiles of mass shooters
Experts have long cautioned that there is no single profile for a mass shooter. But the Violence Project researchers found some personal characteristics often align with certain types of locations targeted by shooters, and created five general categories::

• K-12 shooters: White males, typically students or former students of the school, with a history of trauma. Most are suicidal, plan their crime extensively, and make others aware of their plans at some point before the shooting. They use multiple guns that they typically steal from a family member.
• College and university shooters: Non-white males who are current students of the university, are suicidal, and have a history of violence and childhood trauma. They typically use legally obtained handguns and leave behind some sort of manifesto.
• Workplace shooters: Forty-something males without a specific racial profile. Most are employees of their targeted location, often a blue-collar job site, and have some grievance against the workplace. They use legally purchased handguns and assault rifles.
• Place of worship shooters: White males in their 40s, typically motivated by hate or domestic violence that spills out into the public. Their crimes typically involve little planning.
• Shooters at a commercial location (such as a store or restaurant): White men in their 30s with a violent history and criminal record. They typically have no connection to the targeted location and use a single, legally obtained firearm. About a third show evidence of a “thought disorder,” a term for a mental health condition, like schizophrenia, that results in disorganized thinking, paranoia or delusions

The increase in ideologically-motivated mass shootings has coincided with the emergence of a newly-emboldened far-right, who’ve forged national and even international alliances of hate online. The sharp rise in misogyny-inspired shootings also squares with the rise of the “Incels,” short for “involuntarily celibate,” an online subculture comprised of angry young men who deeply resent and blame women for their isolation.

So nothing about Islamist Jihadist actual Misogynist terrorist attacks...

Coughs... Manchester Bombings... Coughs...

This is why Vice & the Left in general are cancelled.

 

[Deleted member 18214]

The media always has an agenda

 

[TINMAN]

I'm willing to bet that they didn't account for population demographics in the general population. I mean if 80-90% of the population is a certain demographic, It's not surprising if the majority of subset demographic such as criminals would be occupied largely by that demographic. In fact, this not being the case would point to another demographic being over represented relative to their proportion of the population.

 

[mylifeistrash]

Most gun homocides are by white men. Same for terror attacks, not even close.

Media is batshit obsessed with white men, however.

 

[SchrodingersDick]

Racial and misogynistic hatred is entirely understandable. You would expect pushback when giving women even more power, especially power to choose their own mates which inevitably ends up in harems and tons of lonely males, and flooding the first world with third wold invaders incompatible with the natives, and stealing the natives resources and giving it to the invaders.... it’s not unfathomable that one will encounter resistance when implementing things like these...

Competing self propagating systems can not coexist. whites don’t want to go extinct.. isn’t this more proof that Muh equality and especially diversity doesn’t work? Are they just gonna keep doubling down and doing exponentially more damage control at every turn just to keep up the illusion to themselves that diversity works? And then pretend like they don’t understand why some guy picks up a gun and starts shooting invaders? “Oh gee this is a problem that needs to be solved.. ban guns! More mental health resources! Etc etc”... The world has completely lost its mind.

Also lol how they left out the fact that something like 97% of mass shooters come from single mother households.

also also, skimmed thru the article but i doubt they mentioned that the majority of mass shooters are niggers. Probabaly not by kill count cause niggers suck at everything, including mass shootings.

also also also, imagine thinking that disarming the entire civilian population is an appropriate response to a couple dozen people getting shot per year, just because the media makes a spectacle of it all and shoves It down your throat every time it happens...

Edit: FBIcels, I don’t condone violence. Mass shootings bad! White nationalism bad! Misogyny bad! Diversity good! Equality good! Wage gap bad! Bell curve bad! Jews good! Orange man bad!

 

[TINMAN]

Most gun homocides are by white men. Same for terror attacks, not even close.

Media is batshit obsessed with white men, however.

Again, it's the proportionality that matters. Say you have a population of 1000 people, made up of 900 white dudes, 50 blacks, 30 curries and 20 asians. If 240 white dudes, 40 blacks, 15 curries and 5 asians commit some crime, for example murder, whites will make up 80% of all murderers.

However, only 27% of whites committed murder, a much smaller proportion than the 80% of blacks and 50% of curries who did. Only the asians in this example had a lower proportion who committed murder, with 25% of the asians committing murder.

You can't just point to what percent of the total amount of crimes are made by which demographic, because they may not even be that bad compared to another race.

 

[Edmund_Kemper]

Many mass shooters have mental health problems and leftists don't wanna admit it

 

[Deleted member 10124]

Many mass shooters have mental health problems and leftists don't wanna admit it

Completely agree. They've stated that.

 

[Edmund_Kemper]

Completely agree. They've stated that.

who stated what?

 

[Deleted member 10124]

who stated what?

See original post.

 

[RemoveNormalfags]

Okay, but where's the point that most mass shooters got bullied and treated like shit by normies?

 

[Emba]

Most gun homocides are by white men. Same for terror attacks, not even close.

Media is batshit obsessed with white men, however.

The jews want to kill all whites. That's why the (((media))) ignores black crime!


Anyway. Avoid going to Mass brothers!

A consecrated wafer isn't worth your life!!!

And also...

A cheap lobster dinner isn't affordable!

 

[zombie]

And then there’s the fourth thing: legal access to a firearm.

Pure media propaganda trash

 

[zangano1]

Most of them are sexhavers

 

[mylifeistrash]

The jews want to kill all whites. That's why the (((media))) ignores black crime!


Anyway. Avoid going to Mass brothers!

A consecrated wafer isn't worth your life!!!

And also...

A cheap lobster dinner isn't affordable!

I meant to say most are done by non-white men. Whoops

Again, it's the proportionality that matters. Say you have a population of 1000 people, made up of 900 white dudes, 50 blacks, 30 curries and 20 asians. If 240 white dudes, 40 blacks, 15 curries and 5 asians commit some crime, for example murder, whites will make up 80% of all murderers.

However, only 27% of whites committed murder, a much smaller proportion than the 80% of blacks and 50% of curries who did. Only the asians in this example had a lower proportion who committed murder, with 25% of the asians committing murder.

You can't just point to what percent of the total amount of crimes are made by which demographic, because they may not even be that bad compared to another race.

I meant to say non-white.

 

[Midwestcel]

Most gun homocides are by white men. Same for terror attacks, not even close.

Media is batshit obsessed with white men, however.

In the USA in most major cities, most shootings and gun homicides are committed by Tyrone and Co. Detroit and Chicago aren't dangerous cities because of all the white people that live there. I lived in the Detroit area and it happens so much that its like a water still wet story.

One that stands out in my mind happened in 2010. A 34 year old man didn't like the way a 17 year old young man was looking at him and had words with him. The 34 year old warned him "don't be here when I get back". So he went home and got a .357 magnum from his girlfriend's brother who drove him back to the scene, knowing what he planned to do. When the 34 year old saw the 17 year old, he pulled out the gun and shot him in the chest, killing him. All over a look.

He was later sentenced to life in prison.


These types of shootings happen day in and day out in major cities across America. But it's only the rare occasion when a white guy goes on a shooting rampage that its national news.

 

[Iamquiteugly]

they're always ugly

 

[Vermilioncore]

I miss cho. I wanted to befriend him

 

[Deleted member 14382]

Most gun homocides are by white men. Same for terror attacks, not even close.

Media is batshit obsessed with white men, however.

"Where you stand on an issue depends on where you sit"

- Mark Twain

 

[Dionysus]

they're always ugly

 

[FukFeminism]

Most of them are sexhavers

 

[mylifeistrash]

In the USA in most major cities, most shootings and gun homicides are committed by Tyrone and Co. Detroit and Chicago aren't dangerous cities because of all the white people that live there. I lived in the Detroit area and it happens so much that its like a water still wet story.

One that stands out in my mind happened in 2010. A 34 year old man didn't like the way a 17 year old young man was looking at him and had words with him. The 34 year old warned him "don't be here when I get back". So he went home and got a .357 magnum from his girlfriend's brother who drove him back to the scene, knowing what he planned to do. When the 34 year old saw the 17 year old, he pulled out the gun and shot him in the chest, killing him. All over a look.

He was later sentenced to life in prison.


These types of shootings happen day in and day out in major cities across America. But it's only the rare occasion when a white guy goes on a shooting rampage that its national news.

Yeah, I know. I was half asleep I and I typed white men on accident.

 

[Mainländer]

>legal access to firearms

Poor anti gun propaganda. It's the US, pretty much everyone has legal access to firearms. None of the Brazilian mass shooters had it, for example. Wellington Menezes bought his revolvers at a favela and the Suzano shooters purchased all their firearms from onion sites.