Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Toxic Femininity 36 percent of women consider oral sex cheating. 64 percent don't.

deleted fren

deleted fren

Everything burns
-
Joined
Nov 29, 2022
Posts
43,112
Online time
5h 17m

Method
After obtaining institutional review board (IRB)
approval from both universities, a questionnaire was
administered to students enrolled in an undergraduate,
liberal arts course at a medium-sized Midwestern uni-
versity in 1999 (n ¼ 492) and to a human sexuality class
at a large Midwestern university in 2001 (n ¼ 371). The
samples were combined (N ¼ 863) for analyses because
no significant differences between groups were found for
age, t(861) ¼ .88, p ¼ .19; gender, X2 (1) ¼ 2.20, p ¼ .14;
or ethnicity, X2 (3) ¼ 1.99, p ¼ .57. Participants answered
96 items pertaining to demographics, religious back-
ground, political attitudes, relationship and sexual
history, and attitudes about what behaviors constitute
‘‘sex.’’ Twenty-four surveys (3%) were unusable and
removed from the sample because participants did
not answer all items pertinent to the following
analyses. Participants’ ages ranged from 18 through 24.
Twenty-one percent of participants indicated they were
freshmen, 30% sophomore, 11% junior, and 38% senior.
Sixty percent of the sample was female, and more than
90% were White. Sixty-four percent indicated that they
were currently in a romantic relationship. Only 1%
responded that they were legally married. Ninety-six per-
cent of the sample identified as heterosexual; 2% as
bisexual; and 2% as homosexual. The composition of
our nonheterosexual subsample mirrored Sanders and
Reinisch (1999) and Pitts and Rahman (2001), who
reported results for 96% and 97% heterosexual parti-
cipants, respectively.
A between-participants design, rather than a within-
participants design, was used to avoid carry-over effects.
Participants were randomly assigned to one of two
groups. With the exception of 11 items, each group


1000029091


Only 36 percent of women in this study consider oral sex cheating. :feelsclown: :feelsclown: :feelsclown: :feelsclown: it's over
 
whores, what can u expect from them
 
I wouldn't consider oral to be sex either, tbh.

But it's definitely cheating.
 
Brutal if true
 
i'm going to tell my foxy ai gf that I got sucked off by a human. 36% chance she will break up with me.
 
it just gets worse and worse we need to enslave them
 
I have foids with every atom of my body, even those of my shit and piss.
 
best way we can fight this gynocentric pro-israel oligarchy is to not work at all.

The chads won't have any incels sucking their 12 inch cocks anymore.
 
How is that not cheating what is their defence ohh woops he just accidentally shoved his dick in my throat no biggie, every single one of them deserve death. ( in gta)
 
i'm going to tell my foxy ai gf that I got sucked off by a human. 36% chance she will break up with me.
56 consider their partner receiving oral sex cheating.
How is that not cheating what is their defence ohh woops he just accidentally shoved his dick in my throat no biggie, every single one of them deserve death. ( in gta)
They consider their partner doing it cheating too. This is just the mentality women have. They want to cheat themselves, but they don't want their vaginal slaves too.

best way we can fight this gynocentric pro-israel oligarchy is to not work at all.

The chads won't have any incels sucking their 12 inch cocks anymore.
 
The study was not about what people considered to be cheating; it asked what acts they considered to be sex. For example, about thirty-six percent of women said that giving oral sex counted as sex, while a slightly higher percentage of men said that receiving oral sex counted as sex. And since the study surveyed fewer than one thousand people, its results should not be treated as representative of the wider population.
 
The study was not about what people considered to be cheating; it asked what acts they considered to be sex. For example, about thirty-six percent of women said that giving oral sex counted as sex, while a slightly higher percentage of men said that receiving oral sex counted as sex. And since the study surveyed fewer than one thousand people, its results should not be treated as representative of the wider population.
Read between the lines. Why would women consider it not to be sex when they did it, but not their partners? Also, you could say the same for every study as most studies have a sample size of under 1000. You're such a silly billy.
 
Read between the lines. Why would women consider it not to be sex when they did it, but not their partners? Also, you could say the same for every study as most studies have a sample size of under 1000. You're such a silly billy.

You are reading intention into the numbers that the data itself does not show. The study only reports how people labeled specific acts, not why they did so. As for the sample size, fewer than one thousand participants can still limit generalizability; that is not unique to this study, but it remains a valid point.
 
If I'm reading it correctly it says 61% of woman and 65% of men think it's sex/cheating.
Is it really such a big difference ? 4%.People are just degenerates that's all.
 
You are reading intention into the numbers that the data itself does not show. The study only reports how people labeled specific acts, not why they did so. As for the sample size, fewer than one thousand participants can still limit generalizability; that is not unique to this study, but it remains a valid point.
Yes, I know what I'm doing. You don't have to spell it out. It's called critical thinking.
 
Yes, I know what I'm doing. You don't have to spell it out. It's called critical thinking.

If you are using critical thinking, then you should also recognize that the study's data does not explain the reasons behind the responses; adding motives that were never measured is speculation.
 
If you are using critical thinking, then you should also recognize that the study's data does not explain the reasons behind the responses; adding motives that were never measured is speculation.
:soy::soy::soy::soy::soy::soy:
 
If you are using critical thinking, then you should also recognize that the study's data does not explain the reasons behind the responses; adding motives that were never measured is speculation.

Also, as I mentioned earlier, the difference between men's and women's responses was not especially large, so focusing only on the women's answers gives a misleading impression. More importantly, with a sample of fewer than one thousand people, the results are limited and should not be used to draw broad conclusions about either sex.
 
Also, as I mentioned earlier, the difference between men's and women's responses was not especially large, so focusing only on the women's answers gives a misleading impression. More importantly, with a sample of fewer than one thousand people, the results are limited and should not be used to draw broad conclusions about either sex.
:soy: :soy: :soy: :soy: :soy: :soy:
 

You would be the first to complain if a woman took a study where men answered as the women did here and used it to say that all men are bad. I have no respect for most women, but I have even less for people who misuse statistics to confirm what they already believe rather than to understand what the data actually shows.
 
You would be the first to complain if a woman took a study where men answered as the women did here and used it to say that all men are bad. I have no respect for most women, but I have even less for people who misuse statistics to confirm what they already believe rather than to understand what the data actually shows.
They already did. The study shows that women do on average believe this more. I don't care about who you respect. You can stop commenting on my posts. Nothing will be lost.
 
They already did. The study shows that women do on average believe this more. I don't care about who you respect. You can stop commenting on my posts. Nothing will be lost.

If you truly did not care, you would not have replied. And no, the study does not show that women believe anything "more"; it only shows how they define sex in specific scenarios, which is not the same thing.
 
If you truly did not care, you would not have replied. And no, the study does not show that women believe anything "more"; it only shows how they define sex in specific scenarios, which is not the same thing.
You're being a pretentious nitpicking twat. It shows less women view it as sex whilest viewing their partner doing it as sex. There's obviously a reason for this and it's not hard to guess why. Yes, I'm making an assumption. I don't care. No one cares.
 
You're being a pretentious nitpicking twat. It shows less women view it as sex whilest viewing their partner doing it as sex. There's obviously a reason for this and it's not hard to guess why. Yes, I'm making an assumption. I don't care. No one cares.

If no one cared, you would not still be explaining yourself. You are free to assume whatever you like, but an assumption is not evidence, and the study does not support the conclusion that you are drawing from it.
 
If no one cared, you would not still be explaining yourself. You are free to assume whatever you like, but an assumption is not evidence, and the study does not support the conclusion you are drawing from it.
Oh, no. The results don't directly say this is the reason? Then it can't be so! Drawing your own conclusions is wrong!

1000029080
 
Oh, no. The results don't directly say this is the reason? Then it can't be so! Drawing your own conclusions is wrong!

View attachment 1581460

I am not saying that drawing conclusions is wrong; it becomes a problem when those conclusions are not supported by evidence. There is a clear difference between interpreting data in light of what it shows and projecting personal beliefs onto numbers that do not actually support them.
 
Last edited:
Drawing conclusions is not wrong; doing so without clear evidence is. There is a difference between interpreting data and projecting your own beliefs onto it.
:soy: :soy: :soy: :soy:
 
You know that you are wrong and that I am right, so all you can do now is call me names, xD.
I know I'm right, but there's no use debating with you because you won't change your mind.
 
I think they’re so entitled they don’t think that cheating is cheating in general, including dick to vag contact, this definitely supports my theory that Women lie about cheating, 99% of them cheat.
 
OI think they’re so entitled they don’t think that cheating is cheating in general, including dick to vag contact, this definitely supports my theory that Women lie about cheating, 99% of them cheat.
:yes:
 

Similar threads

Balding Subhuman
Replies
34
Views
2K
asexualincel
asexualincel
PhineasSpear
Replies
15
Views
2K
xoxo_404
xoxo_404
PhineasSpear
Replies
14
Views
3K
TurkeyKing
TurkeyKing
Broke Nepo Baby
Replies
4
Views
571
Broke Nepo Baby
Broke Nepo Baby

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top
×
Sponsored
Stake.us
America's #1 Social Casino
Slots, Poker & More
Join Now →