Fuck you. This guy only did what was best under his Christian morals. "Love each other as I have loved you." If we all followed this passage none of us would be here. The world would be a utopia.
Yeah I don’t disagree, the world would be a utopia if evERyone was full of love, but the vERy reason its FAR from being a utopia is because MAJORITY of people are closER to being heartless than they are to having any heart (metaphorically of course).
I don’t have any problem with showing love to living beings who themselves are “mostly” loving, I’m a logical pERson who knows when implementing the concept of “equality” achieves the best possible outcome and when it doesn’t.
For example, I DON’T believe society should promote “equality” between men and women because we clearly are biologically diffERent (not just in the most obvious mannER in the sense of men having a cock and women having a pussy, but according to scientific findings EVEN the “male brain” and “female brain” are wired vERy diffERently to one anothER and they each have their own unique traits). For 99.9% of CIVILIZED human history, (before this rubbish concept of feminism started to get pushed down society’s throats by the jews), men and women played clearly DIFFERENT roles in society.
Men would play an ACTIVE role in writing human history, CREATING the world (via our labour/utility, inventions, innovations) and DESTROYING the world (via warfare, invasions, conquests etc). while women played a PASSIVE role (birthing, rearing and raising children). These clear diffERences between each sex in tERms of what role they typically played in society, wERe NOT artificially enforced, but rathER the result of men and women, WITHOUT any ARTIFICIAL “man-made” intERvention, SUBCONSCIOUSLY and INSTINCTIVELY (as part of the collective “hivemind” NOT only of their respective sex, but the collective “hivemind” of the human SPECIES) following their nature (specific to their sex) by playing their sex’s UNIQUE biologically detERmined role.
So, COMPLETELY CONTRARY to the arguments made by feminists (and the avERage normscum who is a female shit-eatER) that feminist societal structures are “natural” (an argument primarily based on the SCIENTIFICALLY FALSE premise that men and women are “naturally equal” in MOST of the GENETIC attributes, amongst the collection of ALL the genetic attributes which have the MOST potential influence on our lives), and that patriarchy was just an “ARTIFICIAL social construct which was UN-NATURAL, when in ACTUALITY patriarchy was FACTUALLY the societal structure which was TRULY in accordance to NATURE because evERy INDIVIDUAL (BOTH men and women), played the role which would allow them to MAXIMISE the USE of their sex’s respective STRENGTHS and involved MINIMAL USE of their sex’s respective WEAKNESSES, based on each sex’s DISTINCTIVE BIOLOGICAL DUFFERENCES), creating a society in which people wERe able to fulfill much more of their true potential in whatevER attributes that they “naturally” had VALUE in based on which sex they wERe born into, creating a society which functioned with much greatER efficiency, productivity and SUCCESS.
So it’s ACTUALLY FEMINISM which is an ARTIFICIAL “SOCIAL CONSTRUCT” while the patriarchy was not only a societal structure in accordance to NATURE, it was specifically in accordance to the particular aspects of nature which, IF FOLLOWED, UNIVERSALLY leads to an “ovERall” positive outcome for the species”.
Anyways, back to my point, that’s one of the cases in which I’m against equality.
But I follow the principle of equality when it comes to how I behave with othERs (meaning I treat othERs EQUALLY as they treat me). I’m not naturally good or bad to anyone to begin with, by default I treat evERyone with neutrality. If someone is good to me, I will be good to them. If someone is bad to me, I will be bad to them. That’s a completely rational and reasonable mindset to have, and it’s one of the examples of the situations in which implementation of equality is the most logical method of approach. ThERefore, to expect someone to keep showing the world love when the world showed them nothing but hate, is completely nonsensical and defies all logic.
This guy showed love to a world filled with mostly hate, and what did he get for it? He is dead while the girl he risked his life for in ordER to try and save hERs, has probably reached a tally of 100+ diffERent chad cocks she sexually enjoyed since his death. So if people follow this guy’s behaviour in tERms of showing love to a hate-filled world, they will end up expERiencing negative outcomes most of the time just like he did, and consequently a minority of these good people will die prematurely
Whereas, as for the rest of them (the good people who showed mostly goodness to a mostly bad world) who SOMEHOW manage to SURVIVE to a REASONABLE AGE, they will learn “the hard way” that this world DOESN’T reciprocate goodness in othERs by being good to those people BACK (this world DOESN’T reward goodness shown by others by ensuring that good people themselves r also recipients of goodness), INSTEAD (genERally) it sees a “good heart” as a sign of weakness/vulnERability and an opportunity to manipulate, lie, deceive etc. the good pERson, all for the selfish, greedy pERsonal gain of whoevER is doing the “exploiting” and in many fucked up cases, for no pERsonal gain whatsoevER (in tERms of physical, financial or matERial benefit/reward) but simply for the “mental satisfaction” for the cold-hearted and emotionless abusER to “gain” (NOT in REALITY, but only VIRTUALLY in their mind).
So sadly, often times people mistreat othERs just for the sake of gaining something which was nothing more than illusion (which they didn’t realise until they actually “acquired” it), they will hurt a good pERson just to “try to” gain something which nevER even existed, so a lot of good people suffERed for nothing! (NOT even any gain for the people who caused them the pain).
Anyways, as a result of these expERiences, guess what? That “once-upon a time” good pERson will gradually SUBCONSCIOUSLY become more and more evil.
Success/failure in life takes place in accordance to the principle of “survival of the fittest”, and considERing the fact that ONE of the MOST important aspects of “fitness” (in tERms of its level of influence in detERmining a pERson’s “statistically expected” quality/quantity of life), is a living being’s ABILITY to ADAPT to their ENVIRONMENT, the outcome of those “once-upon-a-time” good people gradually becoming more and more evil, is just the result of their subconsciousness adapting to their environment (an environment consisting of a mostly evil world) in ordER to increase their chances of survival, it’s all in accordance to NATURE
Not evERyone can be blamed for being evil from the beginning, many of us wERe good once upon a time, but the ovERwhelming “hatred” and “toxicity” of the environment we wERe raised in or spent a significant amount of time exposed to, resulted in us subconsciously ALSO becoming filled with “hatred and toxicity” not even for the sake of revenge (that comes latER) motivated by angER (of which, thERe is a lot within myself) but simply for the purpose of SURVIVAL, so don’t blame us for becoming more and more immoral/sinful (being less and less righteous) , blame the human species for being mostly putrid, which gave people like myself who wERe once-upon-a-time good people, NO OTHER CHOICE but to become putrid too in ordER to litERally SURVIVE.
In conclusion, As a result of most of the good people eithER dying prematurely or slowly become evil themselves, the proportion of evil people in the world will increase even furthER, And life for the few remaining good people cERtainly won’t be utopia, it will be a living hell.
Congrats, you just exposed yourself to be a bluepilled low IQ retarded clown.
Don’t worry though, thERe are many people like yourself in this circus of a world. I no longER cry because I no longER think of life as a tragedy. I just laugh, because I think of life as a comedy. It’s all one giant massive fucking cosmic joke.
