Brutal 1886 New York Times article says Indians are ugly

[Edmund_Kemper]

Back when you could get away with saying the truth. Over for currycels

NORTHWESTERN INDIANS ARE UGLY. (Published 1886)

www.nytimes.com

@JosefMengelecel @Currycel25 @Caesercel

 

[Deleted member 31093]

Northwestern Indians are the best looking curries. This was written back in 1886 when India and Pakistan were one country so they are referring to northern Pakis and Afghani Pashtuns and Nuristanis who are quite good looking since they have significant European genes

 

[trying to ascend]

Northwestern Indians are the best looking curries. This was written back in 1886 when India and Pakistan were one country so they are referring to northern Pakis and Afghani Pashtuns and Nuristanis who are quite good looking since they have significant European genes

How are they referring to nuristanis if they literally look like a north european?

 

[Deleted member 31093]

How are they referring to nuristanis if they literally look like a north european?

View attachment 421793

Because they live in the Nuristan province of Afghanistan. They’re still considered curries because they live in the geographical boundaries of South Asia

 

[trying to ascend]

Because they live in the Nuristan province of Afghanistan. They’re still considered curries because they live in the geographical boundaries of South Asia

They are curries, but they are good looking, so why would they refer to them as ugly?

 

[Deleted member 31093]

They are curries, but they are good looking, so why would they refer to them as ugly?

Racism

 

[RREEEEEEEEE]

Back when you could get away with saying the truth. Over for currycels

NORTHWESTERN INDIANS ARE UGLY. (Published 1886)

www.nytimes.com

@JosefMengelecel @Currycel25 @Caesercel

Northwestern Indians are the best looking curries. This was written back in 1886 when India and Pakistan were one country so they are referring to northern Pakis and Afghani Pashtuns and Nuristanis who are quite good looking since they have significant European genes

You guys are low IQ as hell. This is about Canadian aboriginals, NOT curries.

Because they live in the Nuristan province of Afghanistan. They’re still considered curries because they live in the geographical boundaries of South Asia

They are curries, but they are good looking, so why would they refer to them as ugly?

Nuristanis are NOT curries, only Indic races are curries. They are Iranic and therefore not curries.

 

[trying to ascend]

You guys are low IQ as hell. This is about Canadian aboriginals, NOT curries.


Nuristanis are NOT curries, only Indic races are curries. They are Iranic and therefore not curries.

Everything near india is curry, indic or not. That's why pakis are called curries

 

[Deleted member 6214]

You guys are low IQ as hell. This is about Canadian aboriginals, NOT curries.


Nuristanis are NOT curries, only Indic races are curries. They are Iranic and therefore not curries.

Lol, literally the first word of the article is "Montreal" People need to read the article before linking it here. However OP is based so I'll let him off

 

[Deleted member 21768]

I still think the browner they are, the better looking they are.
Will easily take a light skinned one. Can't be picky.

 

[Deleted member 31093]

You guys are low IQ as hell. This is about Canadian aboriginals, NOT curries.

Didn’t read the article

Nuristanis are NOT curries, only Indic races are curries. They are Iranic and therefore not curries.

Yes they are. Everyone who has been living inside the geographical boundaries of South Asia for a long period of time is a curry. Stop with the ‘muh curries can only be brown’ cope

I still think the browner they are, the better looking they are.
Will easily take a light skinned one. Can't be picky.

The foids or the men?

 

[RollD20]

Yes they are. Everyone who has been living inside the geographical boundaries of South Asia for a long period of time is a curry. Stop with the ‘muh curries can only be brown’ cope

Here in the west they’re not considered curries, in fact their race is listed as non-european white for survey purposes. Curry/Indian is considered a race not a geographic disposition.

 

[PPEcel]

the word "ugly" refers to behaviour, not physical appearance, and "indians" refer to native americans

wtf this has nothing to do with currycels u dumb fucks

can u read

 

[Deleted member 236]

CANCEL THE NY TIMES

 

[Deleted member 32197]

Its over for currycels. I feel for my Curry Brothers

How are they referring to nuristanis if they literally look like a north european?

View attachment 421793

Wtf how does an indian look like that?

 

[Edmund_Kemper]

Its over for currycels. I feel for my Curry Brothers

Wtf how does an indian look like that?

Pantera is awesome

 

[Deleted member 32197]

Pantera is awesome

Agreed

 

[RREEEEEEEEE]

Everything near india is curry, indic or not. That's why pakis are called curries

Nope, Afghans and Iranians aren't called curries exactly because of this. Pakistanis are called curries because most Pakistanis are Indic.

Lol, literally the first word of the article is "Montreal" People need to read the article before linking it here. However OP is based so I'll let him off

Jfl. Yeah, I know, OP isn't a bad person.

Didn’t read the article

Yes they are. Everyone who has been living inside the geographical boundaries of South Asia for a long period of time is a curry. Stop with the ‘muh curries can only be brown’ cope

The foids or the men?

It's not about brown you self-hating curry, it's about being Indic or not. Skin color is irrelevant. Many Afghans will look curry but they aren't because they aren't Indic.