these people are absolutely worthless. talking to them is like talking to a wall. the fact that they cannot admit even something as basic and easily proven as heightism tells a lot. heightism is something that affects all men in practically every area of life, and even that is not enough for them. imagine talking about the prejudice the only incels struggle with, lmao. is like trying to teach mathematics to a pigeon.
This woman is the incarnation of bluepill lmao
This statement can be debunked by addressing its flawed logic and misrepresentation of how scientific studies work. The claim that studies "suggest a trend but don't offer definitive proof" misunderstands how research works. Most social science studies aren't designed to offer absolute proof — they measure patterns, trends, and correlations across populations. The fact that studies acknowledge their limitations doesn't invalidate their findings — it's a standard part of academic transparency. A single study might be flawed or inconclusive, but dozens of studies across different methodologies and populations consistently show a bias against shorter men in areas like dating, hiring, income, and leadership. Consistent patterns across multiple studies strengthen the evidence for heightism existing as a widespread phenomenon, not just personal preference. The statement tries to downplay heightism by framing it as mere "preference." However, a consistent social preference that leads to disadvantage or discrimination is literally what bias is. If the majority of society holds the same preference against a group, that preference becomes systemic discrimination — even if no individual person feels malicious about it. Saying "No amount of studies will change my mind" is just admitting stubbornness, not rationality. Believing personal experiences over mountains of data is a cognitive bias called confirmation bias — where people only accept evidence that supports their pre-existing beliefs. This is a self-defeating argument. If average people think like average people, and most people prefer taller individuals, that confirms the existence of heightism as a widespread social bias. The statement isn't a rational argument — it's an emotional defense wrapped in faux intellectual language. Refusing to accept consistent scientific evidence doesn't debunk the studies — it just reveals the person's unwillingness to confront uncomfortable truths.
I think emotionally-driven people are much more likely to just ignore facts if they don't like them.
Emotion vs logic, I guess.
Emotion vs logic, I guess.
Similar threads
Rapistcel
Users who are viewing this thread
