lonelysince2006
Barysadist, female gore fan, Amelie Cheung fan
★
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2024
- Posts
- 2,588
I just had to post this because the agecuck copes were ridiculous.
For context, these guys are UNDERAGE THEMSELVES. THESE GUYS 17-YEAR-OLDS.
This guy (who is a tallfag, by the way) starts off by saying this 23-year-old had relations with a 17-year-old.
I said "What's wrong with that? The age of consent is 16 [in Canada]."
"Well, it's still fucking weird. He was 23 and she's 17."
"No, it's literally the law. I don't give a fuck if a 23-year-old fucks a 16-year-old, a 70-year-old fucks a 16-year-old, or an 80-year-old fucks a 16-year-old!"
(I forgot this part.)
"Yeah, but it's called underage because she's 17."
"Why would that matter? The age of consent is 16."
"That's literally pedophilia, dude!"
"No, pedophilia is attraction to a person below 13. TELL ME ONE PLACE in the DSM-5 where it says attraction to a 16-year-old is a disorder."
... He goes away to contemplate (I believe at this point in the conversation).
"Look, it's wrong because most people say it is!" - verbatim
"Why would I care what people think? Do you think I give a fuck what the public thinks?" - This is also an appeal to the majority (logical fallacy).
"You are a pedophile, bro!" - another dude I was with in that group
"Don't call me that if it's IN THE LAW. If you call me a pedophile, call the government too because that's literally what they say."
"[Blah blah blah, it's fucking weird, constant pedophilia accusations, muh public opinion, le heckerino muh 16-year-old innocent angels!!!... endless copes]" - The underage agecuck's babyface starts turning red and he spews spit while towering over me, talking frantically and furiously (his copes are starting to end).
Then, somehow, somewhere in between this argument, he says "Pedophilia is a preference." (I don't know what he was trying to prove.)
"No, just like being heterosexual or homosexual isn't a preference, pedophilia isn't a preference either. It's all genetic."
"No, it is [+ some other stuff I forgot]."
"You saying pedophilia is a preference means you're trying to justify it! It's a disorder."
"It's not, it's a preference." ← Agecuck doesn't even know who or what he stands for, just spews bullshit, unsubstantiated, baseless assertions. Cognitive dissonance too.
We get into a shouting match where he accuses me of pedophilia and I accuse him of justifying pedophilia by saying it's "a preference."
"When I was 10, I still liked girls! It's not a choice."
"No, it's a choice because you can change."
"No, I can't just make myself attracted to men."
"Yes, you can. You just don't know it."
... [Some other stuff I forgot]
"It's not a disorder. It's a preference. It can change."
"No, it's a disorder according to DSM. And castration is the only way to fix it."
Argument ends after we decide to change topics (and he says I'm in the right, but only to end the convo). At the end, the dude who was a third wheel basically calls me a "creep."
↑
Bottom of the barrel ad hominem insult
I plan to argue again tomorrow to tell them that it's basically all ad hominem and the "pedophile" term is a buzzword.
@GeckoBus
Edit: This guy, at some point, also tried to pull out the formula bullshit (age/2 + 7 brainwashed crap), which is when I said I don't give a fuck if an 80-year-old grandpa dates an 16-year-old because IT'S LEGAL!!!
For context, these guys are UNDERAGE THEMSELVES. THESE GUYS 17-YEAR-OLDS.
This guy (who is a tallfag, by the way) starts off by saying this 23-year-old had relations with a 17-year-old.
I said "What's wrong with that? The age of consent is 16 [in Canada]."
"Well, it's still fucking weird. He was 23 and she's 17."
"No, it's literally the law. I don't give a fuck if a 23-year-old fucks a 16-year-old, a 70-year-old fucks a 16-year-old, or an 80-year-old fucks a 16-year-old!"
(I forgot this part.)
"Yeah, but it's called underage because she's 17."
"Why would that matter? The age of consent is 16."
"That's literally pedophilia, dude!"
"No, pedophilia is attraction to a person below 13. TELL ME ONE PLACE in the DSM-5 where it says attraction to a 16-year-old is a disorder."
... He goes away to contemplate (I believe at this point in the conversation).
"Look, it's wrong because most people say it is!" - verbatim
"Why would I care what people think? Do you think I give a fuck what the public thinks?" - This is also an appeal to the majority (logical fallacy).
"You are a pedophile, bro!" - another dude I was with in that group
"Don't call me that if it's IN THE LAW. If you call me a pedophile, call the government too because that's literally what they say."
"[Blah blah blah, it's fucking weird, constant pedophilia accusations, muh public opinion, le heckerino muh 16-year-old innocent angels!!!... endless copes]" - The underage agecuck's babyface starts turning red and he spews spit while towering over me, talking frantically and furiously (his copes are starting to end).
Then, somehow, somewhere in between this argument, he says "Pedophilia is a preference." (I don't know what he was trying to prove.)
"No, just like being heterosexual or homosexual isn't a preference, pedophilia isn't a preference either. It's all genetic."
"No, it is [+ some other stuff I forgot]."
"You saying pedophilia is a preference means you're trying to justify it! It's a disorder."
"It's not, it's a preference." ← Agecuck doesn't even know who or what he stands for, just spews bullshit, unsubstantiated, baseless assertions. Cognitive dissonance too.
We get into a shouting match where he accuses me of pedophilia and I accuse him of justifying pedophilia by saying it's "a preference."
"When I was 10, I still liked girls! It's not a choice."
"No, it's a choice because you can change."
"No, I can't just make myself attracted to men."
"Yes, you can. You just don't know it."
... [Some other stuff I forgot]
"It's not a disorder. It's a preference. It can change."
"No, it's a disorder according to DSM. And castration is the only way to fix it."
Argument ends after we decide to change topics (and he says I'm in the right, but only to end the convo). At the end, the dude who was a third wheel basically calls me a "creep."
↑
Bottom of the barrel ad hominem insult
I plan to argue again tomorrow to tell them that it's basically all ad hominem and the "pedophile" term is a buzzword.
@GeckoBus
Edit: This guy, at some point, also tried to pull out the formula bullshit (age/2 + 7 brainwashed crap), which is when I said I don't give a fuck if an 80-year-old grandpa dates an 16-year-old because IT'S LEGAL!!!
Last edited: