I'm being serious here.
IT(and other leftists)always use 'women hater' as an insult against us.
They claim that we are morally reprehensible because we choose 'to be driven by hatred'
This is nonsense,of course.Hate is the most basics of emotion,and the most potent one.It lies within the heart of every human.
To proclaim such basic emotion as evil in and on itself is insane.
But an even more insane thing to do is to proclaim that a certain group(women) is so noble that you cannot even express the slightest enmity against them.
I mean,consider about hatred against politicians,hatred against certain nations,hatred against conservatives,etc.
Leftists do not frown upon these type of hatred,yet they seethe when people direct their hate against women(i.e us) because women are oh so noble,so fair that we cannot be hateful against them.
Why the double standards?
"Hating a group of people because of their biological sex is inane,because they are born with that sex and they cannot change it"
>"Hating a group of men because of their height or looks is inane,because they are born with those traits and cannot change it."
Have you ever said the latter to women? No,because women are free to have sexual standards.
But you will always say the former to incels,because women are goddesses that cannot be hated.
"Hate against women is bad because it leads to violence"
>Nonsense.It is not hatred that leads to violence,it is desperation.
Why did Mao initiate the Cultural Revolution and pwnd all of his rivals? Because he was desperate to defend his power.
Why did the IJA pilots commit Kamikaze against American ships?
Because they were desperate to keep Americans away from Japan.
See,we incels hate women,but most of us are not desperate enough to do any actual revolutionary struggle against foids.We still have porn,after all.
But if the female bourgeoisie keeps exploiting and opressing men,soon enough desperate men will appear,and who knows what will happen next?
IT(and other leftists)always use 'women hater' as an insult against us.
They claim that we are morally reprehensible because we choose 'to be driven by hatred'
This is nonsense,of course.Hate is the most basics of emotion,and the most potent one.It lies within the heart of every human.
To proclaim such basic emotion as evil in and on itself is insane.
But an even more insane thing to do is to proclaim that a certain group(women) is so noble that you cannot even express the slightest enmity against them.
I mean,consider about hatred against politicians,hatred against certain nations,hatred against conservatives,etc.
Leftists do not frown upon these type of hatred,yet they seethe when people direct their hate against women(i.e us) because women are oh so noble,so fair that we cannot be hateful against them.
Why the double standards?
"Hating a group of people because of their biological sex is inane,because they are born with that sex and they cannot change it"
>"Hating a group of men because of their height or looks is inane,because they are born with those traits and cannot change it."
Have you ever said the latter to women? No,because women are free to have sexual standards.
But you will always say the former to incels,because women are goddesses that cannot be hated.
"Hate against women is bad because it leads to violence"
>Nonsense.It is not hatred that leads to violence,it is desperation.
Why did Mao initiate the Cultural Revolution and pwnd all of his rivals? Because he was desperate to defend his power.
Why did the IJA pilots commit Kamikaze against American ships?
Because they were desperate to keep Americans away from Japan.
See,we incels hate women,but most of us are not desperate enough to do any actual revolutionary struggle against foids.We still have porn,after all.
But if the female bourgeoisie keeps exploiting and opressing men,soon enough desperate men will appear,and who knows what will happen next?
