Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill The so-called "rise" of inceldom and some common blackpill misconceptions PART ONE

Biowaste Removal

Biowaste Removal

The Mauling bEaR
★★★
Joined
Feb 17, 2024
Posts
2,771
This may be a "water is wet" tier post by those who do understand, but there are still many here who do not understand the concepts of what I am about to say. Read until the end if you wish.
.
First of all, I want to debunk a common myth among blackpillers, especially the dramatic or fear-mongering type, who want the claim that inceldom is a recent phenomenon due to "hypergamy" muh the world is ending muh hypergamy. Although it is true that feminism has skewed the power dynamic, those who have the genetics to get laid will still get laid. Most men are not incels, the ratio of incels to sexhavers is greatly exaggerated. You would still have been an incel 500 years ago, 1000 years ago, or 100,000 years ago.

To better put this into perspective think of your doctor's appointments as a kid. The doctor said "out of 100 boys in the room, you would be shorter than 85 of them" or something along the lines of that if you're a manlet. At school, the vast majority of other boys had adequate socialization, friend groups, etc. You were the only socially awkward one. Does it sometimes feel like you were the only one getting bullied? Yeah that's it. That has nothing to do with hypergamy, that's you being a genetic dead-end.

In reality inceldom and the so-called "blackpill" have always existed, and it exists among all species of animals, it is known as something I'm sure you've heard of it called "natural selection". The ones with undesirable genes are weeded out while the ones with desirable genes are allowed to continue to survive and reproduce.

Also women aren't affected by the blackpill and it's not because of feminism. Men have always competed over women. In every culture on earth, it was men who courted women. Men fought countless battles and wars over women. In prehistoric times, the strongest man would get the women and the weaker men were expelled or get leftovers at the very best. And women didn't need any physical qualities to survive because men protected them.

So what does this mean, it means that women only need the bare minimum for human presentation and they will be put on a pedestal to be competed over. Since the natural selection barely affects women, that means women are the harbringers of inceldom as they will be the ones to pass on genes considered undesirable for males onto their sons.

And blackpill isn't about a "few millimeteres of bone" or "leg length". That's an extremely low-IQ take. Natural selection is about your genes as a whole. You aren't an incel simply because of your jawline or nose, you're incel because the entire package of genes that you come with are undesirable. Whether it be low dimorphism + framecel, piss poor phenotype as an ethnic, non-NT and ugly (which is again the result of many features). Even models don't have perfect faces, it's their "gene package" as a whole that matters. For example, the majority of manlets not only have short legs their entire body is smaller they're a smaller human being.

However, despite all this inceldom HAS in fact risen, and is currently on the rise, but not for the reasons that you think they are. I will cover this in part 2 of my post. Tagging users who may be interested: @DarkStarDown @StonePath @Despicablecel @Stupid Clown @Lv99_BixNood @Serpents reign Tagging users who disagreed with me about this in the past: @AsiaCel @gymletethnicel
 
Brutal noreplypill
 
Last edited:
i agree heavily about that blackpill isn't just looks but overall package of your genes

im myself BOTH autistic and schizophrenic and it completely fuck up my whole life on all levels

@WorthlessSlavicShit thougths ?
 
Don't forget that nurture is equally, if not more important than nature. Some people weren't breastfed as a kid, abused, bullied into being a loser, negligent parents, etc even if they have otherwise average genetics.
 
Last edited:
This may be a "water is wet" tier post by those who do understand, but there are still many here who do not understand the concepts of what I am about to say. Read until the end if you wish.
.
First of all, I want to debunk a common myth among blackpillers, especially the dramatic or fear-mongering type, who want the claim that inceldom is a recent phenomenon due to "hypergamy" muh the world is ending muh hypergamy. Although it is true that feminism has skewed the power dynamic, those who have the genetics to get laid will still get laid. Most men are not incels, the ratio of incels to sexhavers is greatly exaggerated. You would still have been an incel 500 years ago, 1000 years ago, or 100,000 years ago.

To better put this into perspective think of your doctor's appointments as a kid. The doctor said "out of 100 boys in the room, you would be shorter than 85 of them" or something along the lines of that if you're a manlet. At school, the vast majority of other boys had adequate socialization, friend groups, etc. You were the only socially awkward one. Does it sometimes feel like you were the only one getting bullied? Yeah that's it. That has nothing to do with hypergamy, that's you being a genetic dead-end.

In reality inceldom and the so-called "blackpill" have always existed, and it exists among all species of animals, it is known as something I'm sure you've heard of it called "natural selection". The ones with undesirable genes are weeded out while the ones with desirable genes are allowed to continue to survive and reproduce.

Also women aren't affected by the blackpill and it's not because of feminism. Men have always competed over women. In every culture on earth, it was men who courted women. Men fought countless battles and wars over women. In prehistoric times, the strongest man would get the women and the weaker men were expelled or get leftovers at the very best. And women didn't need any physical qualities to survive because men protected them.

So what does this mean, it means that women only need the bare minimum for human presentation and they will be put on a pedestal to be competed over. Since the natural selection barely affects women, that means women are the harbringers of inceldom as they will be the ones to pass on genes considered undesirable for males onto their sons.

And blackpill isn't about a "few millimeteres of bone" or "leg length". That's an extremely low-IQ take. Natural selection is about your genes as a whole. You aren't an incel simply because of your jawline or nose, you're incel because the entire package of genes that you come with are undesirable. Whether it be low dimorphism + framecel, piss poor phenotype as an ethnic, non-NT and ugly (which is again the result of many features). Even models don't have perfect faces, it's their "gene package" as a whole that matters. For example, the majority of manlets not only have short legs their entire body is smaller they're a smaller human being.

However, despite all this inceldom HAS in fact risen, and is currently on the rise, but not for the reasons that you think they are. I will cover this in part 2 of my post. Tagging users who may be interested: @DarkStarDown @StonePath @Despicablecel @Stupid Clown @Lv99_BixNood @Serpents reign Tagging users who disagreed with me about this in the past: @AsiaCel @gymletethnicel
I agree because as you said in this thread, Competition over women has always existed. In our modern society, the competition over women has reached a point where only a tiny minority of men win and the rest lose.
 
Does it sometimes feel like you were the only one getting bullied? Yeah that's it. That has nothing to do with hypergamy, that's you being a genetic dead-end.
:yes: I still haven’t met someone who shared the same (or similar) struggles as I did.
 
they are busy fucking their girlfriends, and living their pathetic NormTard lives
It's like @Moroccancel2- said. They are normies and should fuck off with their "dis forum bad for my mental health" shit. It's like Sneir said, everything on here is fiction, because it really is fiction/a game to the normie users.
 
Don't forget that nurture is equally, if not more important than nature. Some people weren't breastfed as a kid, abused, bullied into being a loser, negligent parents, etc even if they have otherwise average genetics.
TBH genes impact nurture. No one ever cared for me or tried to help me with my skills because they thought I was a lost cause since I am severely non-NT. And no one is going to "nurture" an ugly defective child because most parents are in fact normies and they would rather bully their children. Unless you are really lucky with a good parent to have bad genes and a good upbringing, and the odds of that happening are lower than being born with good genes.
 
???? I don't disagree with this.
You should tag people who deny the racepill instead.
 
There have always been incels, yes, but I do think things like hypergamy has increased the amount of incels in recent times, I wouldn't call it a myth, there is tons of data that young men are having exponentially less sex... and birth rates are at a record low, that's not a myth.
But yes, there are people on this forum that would be an incel regardless.
 
I dont fully agree with the post. You imply that normies also can get girlfriends. While thats not false, normies will never get to enjoy the full submission and femininity that a Chad gets to enjoy. A normie has to be her paypig, often has to be submissive towards his gf, is forced to constantly listen to her bs problems. cant do anything when his gf goes "out with the girls" and if he doesnt comply then she will dump him and find a new bf within days. Meanhwile Chad can get nearly every woman and they get girls full submission because a Chad is rare and his genes are superior. If a girl of his harem start to act out, hell just kick her out and find new girls within days
 
Also the male virginity rate is nowadays around 27% and it keeps rising
 
Sexlessness among most young men is on the rise. Social media is increasing the effects of hypergamy.
 
i agree heavily about that blackpill isn't just looks but overall package of your genes

im myself BOTH autistic and schizophrenic and it completely fuck up my whole life on all levels

@WorthlessSlavicShit thougths ?
Of course. Looks are the most visible part of this, but regardless, if you are genetically screwed, you are genetically screwed, no matter how visible that might be.
 
I dont fully agree with the post. You imply that normies also can get girlfriends. While thats not false, normies will never get to enjoy the full submission and femininity that a Chad gets to enjoy. A normie has to be her paypig, often has to be submissive towards his gf, is forced to constantly listen to her bs problems. cant do anything when his gf goes "out with the girls" and if he doesnt comply then she will dump him and find a new bf within days. Meanhwile Chad can get nearly every woman and they get girls full submission because a Chad is rare and his genes are superior. If a girl of his harem start to act out, hell just kick her out and find new girls within days
But we are nowhere near normies' level. Many of us are in fact normies' punching bags. So when incels post about hypergamy, they are indirectly sympathizing with normies. And I don't give a fuck about normies' well-being. Because my point is, whether hypergamy and feminism exist or not, most of us would still have been incels.
 
But we are nowhere near normies' level. Many of us are in fact normies' punching bags. So when incels post about hypergamy, they are indirectly sympathizing with normies. And I don't give a fuck about normies' well-being. Because my point is, whether hypergamy and feminism exist or not, most of us would still have been incels.
True, normies hate incels and would side with Chads any time of the day if they are given the chance.
Social media has destroyed dating and made incel problem worse, now your average 2/10 foid can go on Tinder and get shit toons of simps around her. 30 years ago she wouldnt have that opportunity
 
This may be a "water is wet" tier post by those who do understand, but there are still many here who do not understand the concepts of what I am about to say. Read until the end if you wish.
.
First of all, I want to debunk a common myth among blackpillers, especially the dramatic or fear-mongering type, who want the claim that inceldom is a recent phenomenon due to "hypergamy" muh the world is ending muh hypergamy. Although it is true that feminism has skewed the power dynamic, those who have the genetics to get laid will still get laid. Most men are not incels, the ratio of incels to sexhavers is greatly exaggerated. You would still have been an incel 500 years ago, 1000 years ago, or 100,000 years ago.

To better put this into perspective think of your doctor's appointments as a kid. The doctor said "out of 100 boys in the room, you would be shorter than 85 of them" or something along the lines of that if you're a manlet. At school, the vast majority of other boys had adequate socialization, friend groups, etc. You were the only socially awkward one. Does it sometimes feel like you were the only one getting bullied? Yeah that's it. That has nothing to do with hypergamy, that's you being a genetic dead-end.

In reality inceldom and the so-called "blackpill" have always existed, and it exists among all species of animals, it is known as something I'm sure you've heard of it called "natural selection". The ones with undesirable genes are weeded out while the ones with desirable genes are allowed to continue to survive and reproduce.

Also women aren't affected by the blackpill and it's not because of feminism. Men have always competed over women. In every culture on earth, it was men who courted women. Men fought countless battles and wars over women. In prehistoric times, the strongest man would get the women and the weaker men were expelled or get leftovers at the very best. And women didn't need any physical qualities to survive because men protected them.

So what does this mean, it means that women only need the bare minimum for human presentation and they will be put on a pedestal to be competed over. Since the natural selection barely affects women, that means women are the harbringers of inceldom as they will be the ones to pass on genes considered undesirable for males onto their sons.

And blackpill isn't about a "few millimeteres of bone" or "leg length". That's an extremely low-IQ take. Natural selection is about your genes as a whole. You aren't an incel simply because of your jawline or nose, you're incel because the entire package of genes that you come with are undesirable. Whether it be low dimorphism + framecel, piss poor phenotype as an ethnic, non-NT and ugly (which is again the result of many features). Even models don't have perfect faces, it's their "gene package" as a whole that matters. For example, the majority of manlets not only have short legs their entire body is smaller they're a smaller human being.

However, despite all this inceldom HAS in fact risen, and is currently on the rise, but not for the reasons that you think they are. I will cover this in part 2 of my post. Tagging users who may be interested: @DarkStarDown @StonePath @Despicablecel @Stupid Clown @Lv99_BixNood @Serpents reign Tagging users who disagreed with me about this in the past: @AsiaCel @gymletethnicel
You are absolutely right, and I've said the same thing for ages now. Genuinely hit the nail on its head with this, good thread.
 
Yes, we've always existed.

But, as an oldcel who came up at a time when we were rarer, and there was no Internet and way to discuss/quantify these things, it's nice to feel a little less lonely and know others out there can relate.
 
And blackpill isn't about a "few millimeteres of bone" or "leg length". That's an extremely low-IQ take. Natural selection is about your genes as a whole. You aren't an incel simply because of your jawline or nose, you're incel because the entire package of genes that you come with are undesirable. Whether it be low dimorphism + framecel, piss poor phenotype as an ethnic, non-NT and ugly (which is again the result of many features).
Once i understood it's purely a genetic thing, it's been easier but more painful to swallow the blackpill
 
This may be a "water is wet" tier post by those who do understand, but there are still many here who do not understand the concepts of what I am about to say. Read until the end if you wish.
.
First of all, I want to debunk a common myth among blackpillers, especially the dramatic or fear-mongering type, who want the claim that inceldom is a recent phenomenon due to "hypergamy" muh the world is ending muh hypergamy. Although it is true that feminism has skewed the power dynamic, those who have the genetics to get laid will still get laid. Most men are not incels, the ratio of incels to sexhavers is greatly exaggerated. You would still have been an incel 500 years ago, 1000 years ago, or 100,000 years ago.

To better put this into perspective think of your doctor's appointments as a kid. The doctor said "out of 100 boys in the room, you would be shorter than 85 of them" or something along the lines of that if you're a manlet. At school, the vast majority of other boys had adequate socialization, friend groups, etc. You were the only socially awkward one. Does it sometimes feel like you were the only one getting bullied? Yeah that's it. That has nothing to do with hypergamy, that's you being a genetic dead-end.

In reality inceldom and the so-called "blackpill" have always existed, and it exists among all species of animals, it is known as something I'm sure you've heard of it called "natural selection". The ones with undesirable genes are weeded out while the ones with desirable genes are allowed to continue to survive and reproduce.

Also women aren't affected by the blackpill and it's not because of feminism. Men have always competed over women. In every culture on earth, it was men who courted women. Men fought countless battles and wars over women. In prehistoric times, the strongest man would get the women and the weaker men were expelled or get leftovers at the very best. And women didn't need any physical qualities to survive because men protected them.

So what does this mean, it means that women only need the bare minimum for human presentation and they will be put on a pedestal to be competed over. Since the natural selection barely affects women, that means women are the harbringers of inceldom as they will be the ones to pass on genes considered undesirable for males onto their sons.

And blackpill isn't about a "few millimeteres of bone" or "leg length". That's an extremely low-IQ take. Natural selection is about your genes as a whole. You aren't an incel simply because of your jawline or nose, you're incel because the entire package of genes that you come with are undesirable. Whether it be low dimorphism + framecel, piss poor phenotype as an ethnic, non-NT and ugly (which is again the result of many features). Even models don't have perfect faces, it's their "gene package" as a whole that matters. For example, the majority of manlets not only have short legs their entire body is smaller they're a smaller human being.

However, despite all this inceldom HAS in fact risen, and is currently on the rise, but not for the reasons that you think they are. I will cover this in part 2 of my post. Tagging users who may be interested: @DarkStarDown @StonePath @Despicablecel @Stupid Clown @Lv99_BixNood @Serpents reign Tagging users who disagreed with me about this in the past: @AsiaCel @gymletethnicel
High Iq Take
 
Incredibly high IQ thread. This one deserves a sticky
 
Men have always competed over women. In every culture on earth, it was men who courted women.
I agree with most of what you say but men didnt court for shit coz they are guranteed a chaste virgin wife. couting is a liberal western jewish concept.
 
Another true/false thread.

Yes, inceldom has always existed, but it was in a much lower percentage.

Yes natural selection always existed, but it was largely surpassed with monogamy social norms

Its like saying we are all gonna get run over by a car tomorrow because a male got run over by a car today. Simply laughable logic
 
False. Out of 16 dudes in my former class, atleast 6 are still virgins at the age of 19.
 
Another true/false thread.

Yes, inceldom has always existed, but it was in a much lower percentage.

Yes natural selection always existed, but it was largely surpassed with monogamy social norms

Its like saying we are all gonna get run over by a car tomorrow because a male got run over by a car today. Simply laughable logic
Your analogy at the end shows that you completely misunderstood the majority of my post. The only "social norms" that could have saved you back then is things like arranged marriage, which would've been impossible without some sort of status anyways, and status which is still important today. "Natural selection" isn't just death, but rather the process by which those with certain undesirable genetics are selected out, they are ostracized and not allowed to reproduce. The only ways this could have been overcome is if in situations where those with undesirable genetics were born into a family with much status, which still wasn't a guarantee that they would overcome their inceldom as there have been many cases in history where men like princes were outcast due to failure or disgust. And yes, inceldom was in fact in lower percentages back then, because industrialization hadn't happened yet. I will explain the effects of industrialization in another post. I believe I alluded to that in this post as well. However, the only "laughable logic" here is your ridiculous claim that the vast majority of young men today are INCELS simply due to LTR statistics.
 
I agree with most of what you say but men didnt court for shit coz they are guranteed a chaste virgin wife. couting is a liberal western jewish concept.
Prehistoric times. Men fought each other, strongest ones in the tribe get the women, weakest ones killed, used as fodder or ostracized. Get some leftover scraps at best which rarely happened.
 
Prehistoric times. Men fought each other, strongest ones in the tribe get the women, weakest ones killed,
nobody fought for shit, the foid was gangbanged and the kid was raised by everyone as a family as nobody knows whos kid it was. thats why our dicks are shaped to scoop out other mens cum and increase the possiblity of us being the father.
 
nobody fought for shit, the foid was gangbanged and the kid was raised by everyone as a family as nobody knows whos kid it was. thats why our dicks are shaped to scoop out other mens cum and increase the possiblity of us being the father.
Gangbanged by the men who won, yes. Look at chimpanzees
 
Gangbanged by the men who won, yes. Look at chimpanzees
humans were migratory and lived in small group, so it is another reason why men get exicted to see new foid becasue we can fuck them . people lived in groups to be protected against larger predators and hunt.
 
humans were migratory and lived in small group, so it is another reason why men get exicted to see new foid becasue we can fuck them . people lived in groups to be protected against larger predators and hunt.
Well there must have been some point in prehistory where they competed violently right? And that's when male hierarchy started. Had to be some sort of male hierarchy.
 
Well there must have been some point in prehistory where they competed violently right?
yes like there is a possiblity where one group was unable to get food and the foids in that group left for the group which had food and this made the males in the former group angry and they tried to steal the resources from the other group which lead to violent conflicts.
with the advent of agriculture and to avoid such brutal conflicts there came the practise of mariage.
 
yes like there is a possiblity where one group was unable to get food and the foids in that group left for the group which had food and this made the males in the former group angry and they tried to steal the resources from the other group which lead to violent conflicts.
with the advent of agriculture and to avoid such brutal conflicts there came the practise of mariage.
I might have exaggerated a little about the prehistory part in my post, but I still believe that incels must be the bottom of the barrel. This is from patterns recognized from personal experience, as an incel you are usually the worst in a room (most ugly, least athletic, most non-NT, only deathnic, etc.). If like @AsiaCel said that the vast majortiy of young men are somehow incels, then this wouldn't have been most of our experiences. Most young men are normies who might not have LTR but aren't khhv at all probably get laid every once in a while and nt with social groups and ok genetics overall. hardly incels
 
The fact that we’ve known for about a decade that humanity has twice as many female ancestors as male ones and yet you still find guys who think that inceldom is a new phenomenon and that they would’ve been guaranteed a virgin wife in the past is insane:feelswhat::feelsUgh:.


Not to mention that sometimes the imbalance got even worse.


View: https://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/2zj0bv/8000_years_ago_17_women_reproduced_for_every_one/


Holy fuck, it never began for Incacels:shock::worryfeels::

In the ancient empire of the Incas, sex was a heavily regulated industry. The sun-king Atahualpa kept fifteen hundred women in each of many “houses of virgins” throughout his kingdom. They were selected for their beauty and were rarely chosen after the age of eight—to ensure their virginity. But they did not all remain virgins for long: They were the emperor’s concubines. Beneath him, each rank of society afforded a harem of a particular legal size. Great lords had harems of more than seven hundred women. “Principal persons” were allowed fifty women; leaders of vassal nations, thirty; heads of provinces of 100,000 people, twenty; leaders of 1,000 people, fifteen; administrators of 500 people, twelve; governors of 100 people, eight; petty chiefs over 50 men, seven; chiefs of 10 men, five; chiefs of 5 men, three. That left precious few for the average male Indian whose enforced near-celibacy must have driven him to desperate acts, a fact attested to by the severity of the penalties that followed any cuckolding of his seniors. If a man violated one of Atahualpa’s women, he, his wife, his children, his relatives, his servants, his fellow villagers, and all his lamas would be put to death, the village would be destroyed, and the site strewn with stones. As a result, Atahualpa and his nobles had, shall we say, a majority holding in the paternity of the next generation. They systematically dispossessed less privileged men of their genetic share of posterity. Many of the Inca people were the children of powerful men. In the kingdom of Dahomey in West Africa, all women were at the pleasure of the king. Thousands of them were kept in the royal harem for his use, and the remainder he suffered to “marry” the more favored of his subjects. The result was that Dahomean kings were very fecund, while ordinary Dahomean men were often celibate and barren. In the city of Abomey, according to one nineteenth-century visitor, “it would be difficult to find Dahomeans who were not descended from royalty.” The connection between sex and power is a long one.
:feelsrope::feelsrope::feelsrope:.
 
The fact that we’ve known for about a decade that humanity has twice as many female ancestors as male ones and yet you still find guys who think that inceldom is a new phenomenon and that they would’ve been guaranteed a virgin wife in the past is insane:feelswhat::feelsUgh:.


Not to mention that sometimes the imbalance got even worse.


View: https://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/2zj0bv/8000_years_ago_17_women_reproduced_for_every_one/


Holy fuck, it never began for Incacels:shock::worryfeels::


:feelsrope::feelsrope::feelsrope:.

Bookmarking all these sources, looks like I was right after all. I think a main reason why all these fear-mongers think "rise" of inceldom = end of the world is because of recency bias, which I find to be quite annoying frankly but it's just a normal human reaction among those of average or below average intelligence. Although, inceldom has "risen", and I will cover this in part 2 of this post, where I believe it is due to industrialization and in fact proportionally it has not actually changed that much, just the sample size increased.
 
The fact that we’ve known for about a decade that humanity has twice as many female ancestors as male ones and yet you still find guys who think that inceldom is a new phenomenon and that they would’ve been guaranteed a virgin wife in the past is insane:feelswhat::feelsUgh:.

You would need to be useful at something and have land etc etc to have anything "guaranteed" in the past as well, so yeah nothing is really new.

Not to mention that sometimes the imbalance got even worse.


View: https://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/2zj0bv/8000_years_ago_17_women_reproduced_for_every_one/


Holy fuck, it never began for Incacels:shock::worryfeels::


:feelsrope::feelsrope::feelsrope:.

.
 
You would need to be useful at something and have land etc etc to have anything "guaranteed" in the past as well, so yeah nothing is really new.
It's like I said earlier, back then you needed status for arranged marriage. And what guarantees status? inherited or earned their status and anything when traced back to a point requires a certain form of genetic superiority. Or luck. How many people have actual status that they can use to their advantage irl in 2024? Not very many. And I'm sure they wouldn't have a problem escaping inceldom if they actually had that sort of status even today.
 
This is not natural selection, this is man made, or rather female made eugenics which select for brute strength (height) with no other factors being taken into account
 
Last edited:
TBH genes impact nurture. No one ever cared for me or tried to help me with my skills because they thought I was a lost cause since I am severely non-NT. And no one is going to "nurture" an ugly defective child because most parents are in fact normies and they would rather bully their children. Unless you are really lucky with a good parent to have bad genes and a good upbringing, and the odds of that happening are lower than being born with good genes.
Yeah if I was gl my parents would’ve invested more tome into me
 
Cant believe this bullshit is pinned.

No u GrAY, this has nothing to do with natural selection.

Back im the day even the ugliest of the ugliest had wives because women werent whores and they were down to earth.

Now that they make their own money and naturally have low libido, or better put lower libido stimulus as in not alot of men get them going and sexual frustration for them hits much easier than ours (no testo) therefor they can sinply live their whole lives sexless or have 1 night stand with a random chad each month.

"Natural selection".

No such thing as natural selection between humansl men unless you are extremely gone (like me, completely disabled).

Back then when women stayed home they HAD TO GET MARRIED IN ORDER TO SURVIVE.

ANY HARD WORKING MAN BACK THEN COULD LAND A WIFE EASILY NO MATTER HOW UGLY HE WAS BECAUSE HE WAS NEEDED. TODAY WOMEN DONT NEED MEN, ON THE CONTRARY THEY MAKE EASY MONEY FROM THEM USING ONLYFANS, INSTAGRAM, ECT..

thats the case of 90% of our parents.

looking at my dad hes 5'6 looks like shit is uneducated dumbass retard but he wageslaved all his life and made some unimpressive amount of money.

But looking at my mom shes 5ft dumbass retard and poor herself too with 0 education so ofc she will marry him else she will die starving.

My dad wouldve been a TRUECEL if he was living in my times rn.
 

Similar threads

Jotasso
Replies
3
Views
363
Spooky_Heejin
Spooky_Heejin
D
Replies
19
Views
239
VideoGameCoper
VideoGameCoper
zephyr
Replies
27
Views
629
faded
faded
AshamedVirgin34
Replies
14
Views
838
Namtriz912
Namtriz912

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top