TeeHee "you're not entitled to sex"

[Stupid Clown]

"you're not entitled to sex and a relationship"

Remember as an unattractive man that it's a sin for you to be sad about your state. You're not allowed to be because it's misogynistic. You're just supposed to accept women don't like you and focus on your hobbies like a good little wage slave.

Why is it wrong to be unhappy as a ugly virgin? Because it means you feel entitled to women? Why, well it just does!

It's a moral commandment with no logic outside of the authority bestowed to it by society. Like most moral rules (think how movies always justify grizzly violence and torture by labeling the bad guys rapists, etc, etc..i) t's used to justify primitive human nature in this case women's hatred of unattractive men. "he's a bad person because he's unhappy and can't have sex! That means he's entitled!"


God I hate this society so much. You know that if a woman or an attractive man vented about not getting sex no one would tell them this.


Just look up "ugly man who can't get sex" and then "ugly woman can't get sex" to see this point proven correct.

 

[Regenerator]

If men aren't entitled to sex than women aren't entitled to welfare from the government that they get for being single mothers.

 

[pixy.DARKMEATURKEY]

Users who are viewing this thread​

• PLA1092

 

[Stupid Clown]

Users who are viewing this thread​

• PLA1092

My end is nigh. The accident shall be corrected.

 

[Suicidal Schizoid]

You think they're gonna forget that easy?

 

[VideoGameCoper]

If men aren't entitled to sex than women aren't entitled to welfare from the government that they get for being single mothers.

Also, if men aren’t entitled to sex, women are not entitled to protection. They should also be drafted. They should not be allowed to vote while facing no consequences of their choices

 

[Stupid Clown]

If men aren't entitled to sex than women aren't entitled to welfare from the government that they get for being single mothers.

"No, but that's a human right! Just like how companies should pay us for doing nothing when we take off time to raise our vaginal spawn!" reminder foids actually consider it oppression when companies don't pay them for maternity leave.

 

[Stupid Clown]

Also, if men aren’t entitled to sex, women are not entitled to protection. They should also be drafted. They should not be allowed to vote while facing no consequences of their choices

This is a good point. At the very least women should have to give birth to vote, get a driver's license or use government services. After all we have to serve soyciety by signing ourselves up for the meat grinder to get or do any of those things.

 

[Regenerator]

Also, if men aren’t entitled to sex, women are not entitled to protection. They should also be drafted. They should not be allowed to vote while facing no consequences of their choices

Femoids only want equality when it suits them, They would turn into housewives in a second if their was a draft for femoids.

"No, but that's a human right! Just like how companies should pay us for doing nothing when we take off time to raise our vaginal spawn!" reminder foids actually consider it oppression when companies don't pay them for maternity leave.

They don't deserve maternity leave. I thought they were strong & independent & didn't need men? What happened to that?

 

[VideoGameCoper]

This is a good point. At the very least women should have to give birth to vote, get a driver's license or use government services. After all we have to serve soyciety by signing ourselves up for the meat grinder to get or do any of those things.

Yep. I firmly believe women should have to sign up for selective services the same way men do, or else give up their right to vote.

 

[Efiliste]

Yes, we're the abominations of nature, the ultimate victims. We're entitled to everything.

 

[Zhou Chang-Xing]

Also, if men aren’t entitled to sex, women are not entitled to protection. They should also be drafted. They should not be allowed to vote while facing no consequences of their choices

Exactly, funny how modern society wants toilets to have all privileges men have, keep all privileges toilets have, and get extra privileges simply because they were born with a vagina.

 

[VideoGameCoper]

Femoids only want equality when it suits them, They would turn into housewives in a second if their was a draft for femoids.

Absolutely true. Strong independent woman when it benefits them and a feminine submissive woman any time there is a real danger

They don't deserve maternity leave. I thought they were strong & independent & didn't need men? What happened to that?

They always need men. They’d be screwed without us

 

[Regenerator]

Absolutely true. Strong independent woman when it benefits them and a feminine submissive woman any time there is a real danger

They always need men. They’d be screwed without us

Yep there's no such thing as a "Strong independent woman"

 

[VideoGameCoper]

Exactly, funny how modern society wants toilets to have all privileges men have, keep all privileges toilets have, and get extra privileges simply because they were born with a vagina.

The gynocentrism of modern society is insane. They should get protection if they wanna be feminine and submissive to looks matched men. If they wanna be strong and independent and be Chad only, they should be denied promotion and be left to defend themselves

 

[Zhou Chang-Xing]

If men aren't entitled to sex than women aren't entitled to welfare from the government that they get for being single mothers.

Remember, on average men are net tax payers while toilets are net tax receivers. Even when toilets are in high paying jobs they are rarely hired because they were the best at the job but due to government or BlackRock/Vanguard programmes paying companies to hire toilets. So we are still just literally paying for them and we can't opt out of it, try not paying taxes and end up in prison.

Meanwhile men have literally nothing that we want, every toilet get literally whatever she wants whenever she wants, while men have to beg for the basics and still get nothing.

 

[VideoGameCoper]

Yep there's no such thing as a "Strong independent woman"

Exactly. No strong independent woman in a war or even when it comes time to do physical work.

 

[Regenerator]

Exactly. No strong independent woman in a war or even when it comes time to do physical work.

 

[Stupid Clown]

Femoids only want equality when it suits them, They would turn into housewives in a second if their was a draft for femoids.


They don't deserve maternity leave. I thought they were strong & independent & didn't need men? What happened to that?

Yep. Of course. Women don't actually have a fundamental moral core like men do. I believe someone posted a really good study on this on here but I've lost it unfortunately. They only use morality and activism as a means of helping themselves.



They know they need men. They're sociopathic and view men as tools. Women will always make themselves the victim in any situation they're given. They only claim to be strong independent women out of fleeting narcissism.

 

[Stupid Clown]

Exactly. No strong independent woman in a war or even when it comes time to do physical work

 

[Regenerator]

Yep. Of course. Women don't actually have a fundamental moral core like men do. I believe someone posted a really good study on this on here but I've lost it unfortunately. They only use morality and activism as a means of helping themselves.



They know they need men. They're sociopathic and view men as tools. Women will always make themselves the victim in any situation they're given. They only claim to be strong independent women out of fleeting narcissism.

They would go extinct without us. Women are just inferior men.

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HpaG4u6R-rE

 

[Lonelyus]

No love no life, Thats us, The incels.

 

[Stupid Clown]

They would go extinct without us. Women are just inferior men.

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HpaG4u6R-rE

They know this deep down inside but they're in a constant state of gaslighting themselves into believing they're equal or better than men.

 

[Izaya]

after all of these years of suffering i deserve it

 

[Zhou Chang-Xing]

The gynocentrism of modern society is insane. They should get protection if they wanna be feminine and submissive to looks matched men. If they wanna be strong and independent and be Chad only, they should be denied promotion and be left to defend themselves

You're being delusional, no historical toilet was ever "feminine and submissive", that's a Feminist myth. And even if toilets would go for their looksmatch their hypergamy would express differently. The idea that Chad always wins is a Tinderbrained idea, the selection criteria of toilets is based on the best deal they can get, it's just female nature to be hypergamous.

Limit their choices and they shall comply.

THE ONLY power in a negotiation that ever matters is the ability to say "No", toilets today have no intrinsic need for a long-term male partner if all their sexual needs are fulfilled by various Chad's on Tinder or Bumble, any toilet can deny any man sex and still get laid with a Chad a couple of minutes later.

Men are always disadvantaged because toilets have bargaining power, toilets can always cheat in any relationship, men usually can't cheat and are forced to accept whatever a toilet demands. If a toilet dumps her husband she gets alimony, if she has a child he wants to see aborted she gets child support, any and all of her choices end up with the man having to pay.

This is also why Filipinx toilets are so much easier because a man denying her something actually has an effect on her, I know plenty of stories of Pinxy's where the man didn't want a child and abandoned her, he doesn't need a paper abortion if he can legally deny fatherhood. Meanwhile in Europe if a toilet assigns a random man to be the father he's forced to pay child support and has 0 rights to see his kids.

The only thing men need is bargaining power against toilets, but whatever one man will deny another man will step in and provide. This is why it's impossible to control toilets unless we make very strict rules that prevents toilets from monkey branching from man to man.

Intrinsically every toilet needs men to survive, but no single toilet needs any individual man and most of the men she needs are literally invisible to her, this is why toilets always say "toilets don't need men", but in reality they are never dependent on an individual man but without men as a collective they would die in a couple of days. The main issue here is that men need to bargain as a collective, but this will never happen because any man that can betray other men for his reproductive success will betray other men.

Meanwhile toilets uplift other toilets, this is also why Filipinx toilets who make White Swedish friends will immediately divorce their Swedish husbands and only have casual sex with Swedish Chad's.

 

[IncelusRex]

bump

based thread

 

[chainmail]

My end is nigh. The accident shall be corrected.

what happend brocel? how did you get unbanned

 

[Limitcel]

i feel like they want us to be like "foreveralone" guys
not going to happen

 

[Stupid Clown]

i feel like they want us to be like "foreveralone" guys
not going to happen

No, they tell those guys the same bullshit. Before I came to this forum Inceltear cucks would repost vents innocent guys made on forever alone and call them awful people for being lonely

what happend brocel? how did you get unbanned

The kindness of our Lord and savior Master.

You're being delusional, no historical toilet was ever "feminine and submissive", that's a Feminist myth. And even if toilets would go for their looksmatch their hypergamy would express differently. The idea that Chad always wins is a Tinderbrained idea, the selection criteria of toilets is based on the best deal they can get, it's just female nature to be hypergamous.

Limit their choices and they shall comply.

THE ONLY power in a negotiation that ever matters is the ability to say "No", toilets today have no intrinsic need for a long-term male partner if all their sexual needs are fulfilled by various Chad's on Tinder or Bumble, any toilet can deny any man sex and still get laid with a Chad a couple of minutes later.

Men are always disadvantaged because toilets have bargaining power, toilets can always cheat in any relationship, men usually can't cheat and are forced to accept whatever a toilet demands. If a toilet dumps her husband she gets alimony, if she has a child he wants to see aborted she gets child support, any and all of her choices end up with the man having to pay.

This is also why Filipinx toilets are so much easier because a man denying her something actually has an effect on her, I know plenty of stories of Pinxy's where the man didn't want a child and abandoned her, he doesn't need a paper abortion if he can legally deny fatherhood. Meanwhile in Europe if a toilet assigns a random man to be the father he's forced to pay child support and has 0 rights to see his kids.

The only thing men need is bargaining power against toilets, but whatever one man will deny another man will step in and provide. This is why it's impossible to control toilets unless we make very strict rules that prevents toilets from monkey branching from man to man.

Intrinsically every toilet needs men to survive, but no single toilet needs any individual man and most of the men she needs are literally invisible to her, this is why toilets always say "toilets don't need men", but in reality they are never dependent on an individual man but without men as a collective they would die in a couple of days. The main issue here is that men need to bargain as a collective, but this will never happen because any man that can betray other men for his reproductive success will betray other men.

Meanwhile toilets uplift other toilets, this is also why Filipinx toilets who make White Swedish friends will immediately divorce their Swedish husbands and only have casual sex with Swedish Chad's.

Yep. All women have and will always be the same. It's obnoxious the manosphere always resorts to glorifying some new group of women as le based trad wives instead of accepting this fact. Passport bros movement has unironically created more betabuxxes than anything else.

 

[Tacomonkey]

"you're not entitled to sex and a relationship"

Remember as an unattractive man that it's a sin for you to be sad about your state. You're not allowed to be because it's misogynistic. You're just supposed to accept women don't like you and focus on your hobbies like a good little wage slave.

Why is it wrong to be unhappy as a ugly virgin? Because it means you feel entitled to women? Why, well it just does!

It's a moral commandment with no logic outside of the authority bestowed to it by society. Like most moral rules (think how movies always justify grizzly violence and torture by labeling the bad guys rapists, etc, etc..i) t's used to justify primitive human nature in this case women's hatred of unattractive men. "he's a bad person because he's unhappy and can't have sex! That means he's entitled!"


God I hate this society so much. You know that if a woman or an attractive man vented about not getting sex no one would tell them this.


Just look up "ugly man who can't get sex" and then "ugly woman can't get sex" to see this point proven correct.

Nigga didn’t you get banned for being a faggot?

 

[VideoGameCoper]

You're being delusional, no historical toilet was ever "feminine and submissive", that's a Feminist myth. And even if toilets would go for their looksmatch their hypergamy would express differently. The idea that Chad always wins is a Tinderbrained idea, the selection criteria of toilets is based on the best deal they can get, it's just female nature to be hypergamous.

Limit their choices and they shall comply.

THE ONLY power in a negotiation that ever matters is the ability to say "No", toilets today have no intrinsic need for a long-term male partner if all their sexual needs are fulfilled by various Chad's on Tinder or Bumble, any toilet can deny any man sex and still get laid with a Chad a couple of minutes later.

Men are always disadvantaged because toilets have bargaining power, toilets can always cheat in any relationship, men usually can't cheat and are forced to accept whatever a toilet demands. If a toilet dumps her husband she gets alimony, if she has a child he wants to see aborted she gets child support, any and all of her choices end up with the man having to pay.

This is also why Filipinx toilets are so much easier because a man denying her something actually has an effect on her, I know plenty of stories of Pinxy's where the man didn't want a child and abandoned her, he doesn't need a paper abortion if he can legally deny fatherhood. Meanwhile in Europe if a toilet assigns a random man to be the father he's forced to pay child support and has 0 rights to see his kids.

The only thing men need is bargaining power against toilets, but whatever one man will deny another man will step in and provide. This is why it's impossible to control toilets unless we make very strict rules that prevents toilets from monkey branching from man to man.

Intrinsically every toilet needs men to survive, but no single toilet needs any individual man and most of the men she needs are literally invisible to her, this is why toilets always say "toilets don't need men", but in reality they are never dependent on an individual man but without men as a collective they would die in a couple of days. The main issue here is that men need to bargain as a collective, but this will never happen because any man that can betray other men for his reproductive success will betray other men.

Meanwhile toilets uplift other toilets, this is also why Filipinx toilets who make White Swedish friends will immediately divorce their Swedish husbands and only have casual sex with Swedish Chad's.

True. Women need men as a whole to survive, but no individual man in particular means anything. Brutal truth. Back in the 1800s, women couldn’t just jump from man to man and had to be loyal to one man

 

[Saint Kanga]

Good thread, also welcome back

 

[ItsovERfucks]

Good thread brocel

 

[joejutish]

"you're not entitled to sex and a relationship"

Remember as an unattractive man that it's a sin for you to be sad about your state. You're not allowed to be because it's misogynistic. You're just supposed to accept women don't like you and focus on your hobbies like a good little wage slave.

Why is it wrong to be unhappy as a ugly virgin? Because it means you feel entitled to women? Why, well it just does!

It's a moral commandment with no logic outside of the authority bestowed to it by society. Like most moral rules (think how movies always justify grizzly violence and torture by labeling the bad guys rapists, etc, etc..i) t's used to justify primitive human nature in this case women's hatred of unattractive men. "he's a bad person because he's unhappy and can't have sex! That means he's entitled!"


God I hate this society so much. You know that if a woman or an attractive man vented about not getting sex no one would tell them this.


Just look up "ugly man who can't get sex" and then "ugly woman can't get sex" to see this point proven correct.

well, take my moms advice bro!! she said its okay as long as you have your feet, hand and are alive bro!!!! be GRATEFUL BROO!!!

 

[yebamoth]

This is a good point. At the very least women should have to give birth to vote, get a driver's license or use government services. After all we have to serve soyciety by signing ourselves up for the meat grinder to get or do any of those things.

Don't forget about another thing which I often notice: when it's about paying for date foids are 100% for men paying for everything, traditional style, BUT when it goes about abortion they scream we're not in medieval times anymore.

 

[Stupid Clown]

Don't forget about another thing which I often notice: when it's about paying for date foids are 100% for men paying for everything, traditional style, BUT when it goes about abortion they scream we're not in medieval times anymore.

Basically they're all for being treated in a traditional manner untill it requires them to take responsibility