B
We all hopefully know here that personality is a meme -- OkCupid even proved this to where the normies/idiots in general can't argue much against, i.e., the whole, "your personality and how it is rated according to how attractive you're seen" bit.
The whole "your looks is your personality," yet people will grudgingly accept that maybe but then try to DIVERT this to something like, "Oh, it's your behavior then." The term "behavior" is vague -- what does it really tell us? Can we judge behavior without LOOKS BIAS?
Redpill copers and such love the whole "behavior" angle because it's far too easy to keep moving the goalpost for the clueless, i.e., "you moved wrongly, bro," or "you did not turn your head at the right time to sync with your arms," etc. Basically they can keep spinning the bullshit because it is indeed possible to keep the bullshit going when it's so up in the air/unspecific in how another judges one's supposed "behavior."
But from my shitty experiences growing up I will tell you how it is --
your "behavior" is just filtered 100% through your looks. Goofy kid tries something normal? Everyone laughs. They aren't laughing at his "behavior" -- they're laughing at how his body moves/what they perceive from the LOOKS of the person DOING A BEHAVIOR OR PHYSICAL ACTION. If not, why would some people laugh at some doofy looking guy trying something, but be more quiet if it's some normal or GL guy/person? Our LOOKS tell others what our "behavior" really is/means.
When I was a kid I had a "goofy" look and a wimpy voice -- both of which were made fun of by family members, including an older, near-Chadly cousin. I would record my voice "for fun" long ago with those voice recorder shits people used before the internet was high-speed porn city like it is today. All of my voice clips were laughed at and I was ultimately perceived/judgedBY MY VOICE -- AN INHERENT TRAIT.
If me -- the goofy looking kid with the long midface and wimpy voice -- did something it's more so "funny" than if a more normal looking kid does it, even if it's not meant to be funny at all. The strongest predictor on how "behavior" is analyzed is through the MOLD OF THE ACTOR.
Have you seen comedians? Notice how they're often not good looking? They're often either ugly, plain average or just odd looking AKA ugly probably anyways. LOL Ultimately comedy is a performance art -- looks HEAVILY play a role here too like in every area of life.
Comedians often are supposed to "convey humor," but how do they really show it? Through their looks -- chubby, goofy face, strange facial expressions and exaggerations, etc. Imagine if some super hunk with a perfect face tried to be a comedian -- people may laugh because of the halo effect, but it's NOT THE SAME as laughing at some weird looking doofus people naturally love to point at and crave/enjoy their misfortunes.
Comedians being ugly is a blessing -- people love to laugh at failures and mistakes -- it's nature. What better shows a mistake or laughable tendency than observing some balding, doofy looking guy on a stage with a pot belly telling you how he gets rejected 1,000s of times and everyone shits on him/his life is a slapstick joke? It somehow just "makes sense" when an ugly guy is laughed at on that stage, eh?
Comedians are "funny" because they rely on their body in motion, facial expressive range, etc. (AKA THEIR LOOKS AND INHERENT TRAITS) to be funny. The "stories" they tell that are "funny" like being rejected, beat up, screwed over, etc. (basically self-pity kind of shit) only happen to ugly men. Imagine Chad goes on stage and tells stories of how he gets rejected, people treat him like shit, endless life problems, etc. Who the fuck would actually believe this? LOL Even again if they laugh at him due to the halo effect the actual humor/comedic part is unbelievable when further observed since what GL person -- especially a guy -- will have a whole bunch of fail stories to tell an audience like an ugly, joke a man would do, to laugh at said misfortunes? People even may be driven to comedy as a way to self-sabotage/convey their life truths/issues with a fitting exterior to boot. After all, how many smoking hot comedians do you see? Most are goofy guys, fat guys, uggos, Berthas/ugly girls.
In the end people observe WITH THEIR EYES and JUDGE BY WHAT THEY SEE AND HEAR (but more so SEE). Any and ALL "ranges" of looks will convey slightly different things to people, all varying according to your looks level and exact specifics of your traits -- height, facial structure, voice, frame, features (eyes, nose, hair, etc.) If you look "funny" doing things it means you look funny -- it's LOOKS, not "BEHAVIOR." If you look stupid doing something then people are telling you another truth -- your appearance comes across to them as "dumb" or "low IQ." Look smart doing something? Congrats -- probably aren't that ugly then at least. LOL Basically it's ALL LOOKS, NOTHING ELSE.
Whenredpillers tell you "behavior" or other BS some might tell you, what they're really saying is, "Change your face so you look like you'd give off a better impression of 'X'" Since your LOOKS and INHERENT TRAITS strongly determine how others will judge you then it's ridiculous to think you actually can "act outside of your looks" or something of that stupidity.
Your looks = your personality, but your behavior = your looks in motion. In the end it all comes back to inherent traits -- everything else besides them is COPE. Even outside of sex you're judged by other guys immediately by how masculine, goofy, etc. you look too -- and the consequences of this can be HUGE. Not looking "manly enough" might make other guys see you as not good enough to join their group, "play" with them, etc. You can just as easily be disbanded from a group for not being "manly appearing" enough as other guys will think you are too weak and not relatable enough, just like women will look at you and feel no attraction because millimeters of bone as well.
The whole "your looks is your personality," yet people will grudgingly accept that maybe but then try to DIVERT this to something like, "Oh, it's your behavior then." The term "behavior" is vague -- what does it really tell us? Can we judge behavior without LOOKS BIAS?
Redpill copers and such love the whole "behavior" angle because it's far too easy to keep moving the goalpost for the clueless, i.e., "you moved wrongly, bro," or "you did not turn your head at the right time to sync with your arms," etc. Basically they can keep spinning the bullshit because it is indeed possible to keep the bullshit going when it's so up in the air/unspecific in how another judges one's supposed "behavior."
But from my shitty experiences growing up I will tell you how it is --
your "behavior" is just filtered 100% through your looks. Goofy kid tries something normal? Everyone laughs. They aren't laughing at his "behavior" -- they're laughing at how his body moves/what they perceive from the LOOKS of the person DOING A BEHAVIOR OR PHYSICAL ACTION. If not, why would some people laugh at some doofy looking guy trying something, but be more quiet if it's some normal or GL guy/person? Our LOOKS tell others what our "behavior" really is/means.When I was a kid I had a "goofy" look and a wimpy voice -- both of which were made fun of by family members, including an older, near-Chadly cousin. I would record my voice "for fun" long ago with those voice recorder shits people used before the internet was high-speed porn city like it is today. All of my voice clips were laughed at and I was ultimately perceived/judged
BY MY VOICE -- AN INHERENT TRAIT.If me -- the goofy looking kid with the long midface and wimpy voice -- did something it's more so "funny" than if a more normal looking kid does it, even if it's not meant to be funny at all. The strongest predictor on how "behavior" is analyzed is through the MOLD OF THE ACTOR.
Have you seen comedians? Notice how they're often not good looking? They're often either ugly, plain average or just odd looking AKA ugly probably anyways. LOL Ultimately comedy is a performance art -- looks HEAVILY play a role here too like in every area of life.
Comedians often are supposed to "convey humor," but how do they really show it? Through their looks -- chubby, goofy face, strange facial expressions and exaggerations, etc. Imagine if some super hunk with a perfect face tried to be a comedian -- people may laugh because of the halo effect, but it's NOT THE SAME as laughing at some weird looking doofus people naturally love to point at and crave/enjoy their misfortunes.
Comedians being ugly is a blessing -- people love to laugh at failures and mistakes -- it's nature. What better shows a mistake or laughable tendency than observing some balding, doofy looking guy on a stage with a pot belly telling you how he gets rejected 1,000s of times and everyone shits on him/his life is a slapstick joke? It somehow just "makes sense" when an ugly guy is laughed at on that stage, eh?
Comedians are "funny" because they rely on their body in motion, facial expressive range, etc. (AKA THEIR LOOKS AND INHERENT TRAITS) to be funny. The "stories" they tell that are "funny" like being rejected, beat up, screwed over, etc. (basically self-pity kind of shit) only happen to ugly men. Imagine Chad goes on stage and tells stories of how he gets rejected, people treat him like shit, endless life problems, etc. Who the fuck would actually believe this? LOL Even again if they laugh at him due to the halo effect the actual humor/comedic part is unbelievable when further observed since what GL person -- especially a guy -- will have a whole bunch of fail stories to tell an audience like an ugly, joke a man would do, to laugh at said misfortunes? People even may be driven to comedy as a way to self-sabotage/convey their life truths/issues with a fitting exterior to boot. After all, how many smoking hot comedians do you see? Most are goofy guys, fat guys, uggos, Berthas/ugly girls.
In the end people observe WITH THEIR EYES and JUDGE BY WHAT THEY SEE AND HEAR (but more so SEE). Any and ALL "ranges" of looks will convey slightly different things to people, all varying according to your looks level and exact specifics of your traits -- height, facial structure, voice, frame, features (eyes, nose, hair, etc.) If you look "funny" doing things it means you look funny -- it's LOOKS, not "BEHAVIOR." If you look stupid doing something then people are telling you another truth -- your appearance comes across to them as "dumb" or "low IQ." Look smart doing something? Congrats -- probably aren't that ugly then at least. LOL Basically it's ALL LOOKS, NOTHING ELSE.
When
redpillers tell you "behavior" or other BS some might tell you, what they're really saying is, "Change your face so you look like you'd give off a better impression of 'X'" Since your LOOKS and INHERENT TRAITS strongly determine how others will judge you then it's ridiculous to think you actually can "act outside of your looks" or something of that stupidity.Your looks = your personality, but your behavior = your looks in motion. In the end it all comes back to inherent traits -- everything else besides them is COPE. Even outside of sex you're judged by other guys immediately by how masculine, goofy, etc. you look too -- and the consequences of this can be HUGE. Not looking "manly enough" might make other guys see you as not good enough to join their group, "play" with them, etc. You can just as easily be disbanded from a group for not being "manly appearing" enough as other guys will think you are too weak and not relatable enough, just like women will look at you and feel no attraction because millimeters of bone as well.
Last edited:
