Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Venting Your genes are probably fine, its women’s standards that are the problem.

Iamnothere000

Iamnothere000

Veteran
★★★★
Joined
Nov 13, 2019
Posts
1,303
I’m sick and tired of this self-loathing talk about our supposed “subhumanity”.

Your genes are ok unless you have a serious heritable disability or deformation.


It’s ok to be short and ugly.

It’s ok to be balding at 20 and to have a recessed chin.

It’s ok to have brown eyes.

It’s ok to have prey eyes.


As long as you could pull your own weight within society, none of those things should matter.

It is only because of women’s ever increasing standard for superficial aesthetics that those thing have any meaning.

Stop measuring yourself by the standards of “people” who are literally designed by nature to never be satisfied and to only select the “best of the best” for reproduction.

Natural selection by females has stopped to matter with the creation of civilization. Anything beyond that is just superficial nonsense.

If you are able to sustain yourself, any further self-improvement is unnecessary. What is necessary is to take away female choice by any means.
 
Last edited:
Cope, even back then women were turned off by short, ugly men. Even though we are living in modern times, we still have stone-age instincts.
 
Last edited:
Sounds good but evolution, mate selection doesn't work that way. Bad genes need to be breeded out of the gene pool no ifs no buts. :smonk:
 
Sounds good but evolution, mate selection doesn't work that way. Bad genes need to be breeded out of the gene pool no ifs no buts. :smonk:
By subhuman incel factory women :feelsohgod:
Thats what infuriates me.
 
I somewhat agree but not with the "contributing" bullshit.

It shouldn't matter if you wageslave or not, period.
 
Sounds good but evolution, mate selection doesn't work that way. Bad genes need to be breeded out of the gene pool no ifs no buts. :smonk:
The problem with this "evolution" argument is that genetically subhuman foids are also reproducing, thereby continuing the bad genes in humans.

The only way I'll agree with this "evolution" argument is if the genetically top 1% of men reproduce ONLY WITH the genetically top 1% of women, with all other humans not reproducing. If that doesn't happen then I can't agree with "evolution" and "natural selection" arguments.
 
Im really just trash even compared to most men.
 
Cope, even back then women were turned off by short, ugly men. Even though we are living in modern times, we still have stone-age instincts.
Based and blackpilled. Height plays a massive fuckin role in social settings. There's a reason my most CEO's are over 6ft and why the taller candidate usually wins.
I never knew that having brown eyes was a subhuman trait.
Prepare yourself for my thread on eye color. If you have brown eyes you might want to kill yourself.
 
That's exactly why hypergamy is bad. Subhuman women shouldn't be allowed to breed
The problem with this "evolution" argument is that genetically subhuman foids are also reproducing, thereby continuing the bad genes in humans.

The only way I'll agree with this "evolution" argument is if the genetically top 1% of men reproduce ONLY WITH the genetically top 1% of women, with all other humans not reproducing. If that doesn't happen then I can't agree with "evolution" and "natural selection" arguments.
Not top 1% more like everyone but the bottom 1% should reproduce. Average looking or people with average traits could give birth to a kid with extraordinary traits too but the bottom 1% genes need to be breeder out.
 
It’s nice that you posted this. Totally agree.
 
’m sick and tired of this self-loathing talk about our supposed “subhumanity”.
Me too. I'm really tired to see Tails- blackpill spreading the idea that sub-5 men not reproducing is a good thing
 
cope,ugly and short should be counted as disability

anyone with genetic quality inferior than below shouldn't reproduce
Img3duitang
 
Tbh I have good genes, I am tall, have no disabilities or allergies or inherited conditions. When I was younger I had amazing stamina and fitness despite not doing much exercise, and also a very fast metabolism. The only thing wrong with me is that my ears are weirdly positioned and my nose is abnormally large and I have a small chin. But that's all that matters in today's world, the aesthetic nature of your face.
 
The problem with this "evolution" argument is that genetically subhuman foids are also reproducing, thereby continuing the bad genes in humans.

The only way I'll agree with this "evolution" argument is if the genetically top 1% of men reproduce ONLY WITH the genetically top 1% of women, with all other humans not reproducing. If that doesn't happen then I can't agree with "evolution" and "natural selection" arguments.
But eugenics is bad, inkwell! :soy:
 
Cope, even back then women were turned off by short, ugly men. Even though we are living in modern times, we still have stone-age instincts.
Women infinitely more so than men. Men tamed their instincts for the sake of civilization (through the invention of marriage). Women however are still no better than apes.


I somewhat agree but not with the "contributing" bullshit.

It shouldn't matter if you wageslave or not, period.
Ok, but for the sake of civilization (if you care) only people who can pull their own weight (from a genetic pov) should be able to reproduce. But everybody should have a fair chance of sex and intimacy.


I never knew that having brown eyes was a subhuman trait.
Women are more eugenicist than the Nazis and the Nazis adored “blond hair and blue eyes”. Every noodelwhore would kill to have a baby with such features.



its coz the modern west rob taxpayers of their money and give back to foids, practically acting like a free betabux for foids, so they now dont value any betabuxxing quality and become chads only.

socialism is pure cancer
That’s what I meant with “civilization”. From now on women could just have dropped theirs stone age standards because survival is now guaranteed for everyone. But they still select for them which is retarded and even dysfunctional when you have no evolutionary pressure.


Im really just trash even compared to most men.
If you could theoretically support yourself, you deserve to reproduce. And you deserve sex and intimacy in either case because you are a human being.


Based and blackpilled. Height plays a massive fuckin role in social settings. There's a reason my most CEO's are over 6ft and why the taller candidate usually wins.
It only plays such a big role because women value it so much. Men respect each other partly based on their sexual success (which is dependent on height). If height would not matter to foids, it also would matter less to men and society in general.


cope,ugly and short should be counted as disability

anyone with genetic quality inferior than below shouldn't reproduce
View attachment 478631
You are either joking, gay, incredibly vain or have internalized gynocentrism. Kill yourself in three of those cases.


Tbh I have good genes, I am tall, have no disabilities or allergies or inherited conditions. When I was younger I had amazing stamina and fitness despite not doing much exercise, and also a very fast metabolism. The only thing wrong with me is that my ears are weirdly positioned and my nose is abnormally large and I have a small chin. But that's all that matters in today's world, the aesthetic nature of your face.
Sry bro

View: https://youtu.be/mkIwopkWD_M?t=82
 

Similar threads

Runt171
Replies
8
Views
309
Moroccancel
Moroccancel
IceMan2000
Replies
7
Views
277
notcracklord
notcracklord
rvj
Replies
22
Views
734
edgelordcel
edgelordcel
littlemanhikicel
Replies
64
Views
1K
notcracklord
notcracklord
F
Replies
22
Views
566
BreezyHills
BreezyHills

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top