"Social skills" are an illusion.
Your attractiveness IS your social life.
Because it's taboo to talk about looks directly, we use terms like "kindness, humility, sense of humor, confidence, etc." when describing peoples' personalities (aka their "social skills")
But pay close attention and you'll find that looks ultimately define ALL of those characteristics.
For example, a jester is only considered "funny" if he's funny ENOUGH to make up for how ugly he is.
Many ugly men are much funnier than Chads, but they're not considered "funnier" than a Chad with even a slight sense of humor because they're not funny ENOUGH relative to their looks, whereas Chad is (chad doesn't need to have a sense of humor at all, so any ability to laugh is icing on the cake for him)
And so it goes with every social skill. It's all tied to your looks and based on that.
I want to emphasize the futility in "improving one's social skills":
If your social skills outstrip your looks, you actually lose social status because people will see you as "overcompensating for your inferior looks" (this is your typical jestermaxxed normie)
But if your looks outstrip your social skills, you're given the benefit of the doubt (chad only has to nail one out of ten jokes and people will focus on the one joke, whereas the jester has to nail all 10 or people will focus on the one that fell flat)
And so the uglier you are, the less you should want to improve your "social skills" (it's an impossible feat and will only work against you should you manage to succeed)
Your attractiveness IS your social life.
Because it's taboo to talk about looks directly, we use terms like "kindness, humility, sense of humor, confidence, etc." when describing peoples' personalities (aka their "social skills")
But pay close attention and you'll find that looks ultimately define ALL of those characteristics.
For example, a jester is only considered "funny" if he's funny ENOUGH to make up for how ugly he is.
Many ugly men are much funnier than Chads, but they're not considered "funnier" than a Chad with even a slight sense of humor because they're not funny ENOUGH relative to their looks, whereas Chad is (chad doesn't need to have a sense of humor at all, so any ability to laugh is icing on the cake for him)
And so it goes with every social skill. It's all tied to your looks and based on that.
I want to emphasize the futility in "improving one's social skills":
If your social skills outstrip your looks, you actually lose social status because people will see you as "overcompensating for your inferior looks" (this is your typical jestermaxxed normie)
But if your looks outstrip your social skills, you're given the benefit of the doubt (chad only has to nail one out of ten jokes and people will focus on the one joke, whereas the jester has to nail all 10 or people will focus on the one that fell flat)
And so the uglier you are, the less you should want to improve your "social skills" (it's an impossible feat and will only work against you should you manage to succeed)
Last edited:
