Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

You know evolution and stuff,

G

Guest2

Guest
well how did insects and that get wings? Obviously they're not going to have fully functioning wings straight off the bat, nevermind having the innate behaviour to know how to use them, so how would they have evolved over hundreds or thousands of generations with things on their backs which would have been a hindrance at first?

Obviously they have to survive to reproduce, and having extra weight on the back and having to eat more to grow and all that would make it more likely to die, ya know? I mean, it makes sense for sea creatures because they would have more food and no predators on land, and the ones with more developed fins which could traverse land easier would love to breed, but I can't really say the same for winged insects. Can someone explain it to me, because I remember I asked my old biology teacher the same thing and he just said like "shut up and get on with your work" lol. He was a cool curry tbh
 
13616
 
OP is coping because he's not chad
 
I think slowly over time they adapted abilities and features and you end up with wings, same as the many species who used to live underwater who now dwell on land
 
I think slowly over time they adapted abilities and features and you end up with wings, same as the many species who used to live underwater who now dwell on land
Yeah but how do those with budding wings survive more than those without? They're not going to just randomly wake up with wings in one generation; they'll be undeveloped completely at first and unusable for hundreds of generations, so why are those with random lumps of flesh and carapace reproducing more than those with other adaptions?
 
I dunno bunny bro.
@BrendioEEE isn't this your level of expertise?
From research I have done personally, most theories/hypothesis on long term evolution/mutation over millions of years is nonsense for the most part, you'd be surprised how many scientists, even evolutionary biologists who have been studying this and have come to this conclusion, albeit it many too afraid to talk about it for fear of losing their careers/credibility.

Evolution is very real tho, so is genetic engineering, and eugenics, we are innately biological creatures, it's just for example, the eye, there is no fucking way the eye would ever happen, or for example a non winged creature to become a creature with wings naturally over millions of years, animals/humans are based on looks/lookism to a degree, many female animals if they see something slightly off or deformed about another animal they simply will not breed with that animal, we have tested this.

Grand mutations typically do not pass on, unless outside force allows it to happen, or rape possibly. Genetic engineering is also a big one. I could go into more depth and detail about this but it would have taken quite a bit longer to write out and I didn't want to be super articulate and autistic about it.
 
Yeah but how do those with budding wings survive more than those without? They're not going to just randomly wake up with wings in one generation; they'll be undeveloped completely at first and unusable for hundreds of generations, so why are those with random lumps of flesh and carapace reproducing more than those with other adaptions?
At first, it will be very small changes, gills that work a little better on land, eyes that see a little better out of the water, skin that dries out a little slower. But generation after generation, as novel gene combinations occur and new mutations arise, these changes will become more profound. Longer, stiffer fins become limbs, gill become full functioning lung, sensory organs adapt to work out of water, etc.
It might take millions of generations over millions of years, but eventually those small changes add up to big adaptations.-from a user from the front page of the internet
 
At first, it will be very small changes, gills that work a little better on land, eyes that see a little better out of the water, skin that dries out a little slower. But generation after generation, as novel gene combinations occur and new mutations arise, these changes will become more profound. Longer, stiffer fins become limbs, gill become full functioning lung, sensory organs adapt to work out of water, etc.
It might take millions of generations over millions of years, but eventually those small changes add up to big adaptations.-from a user from the front page of the internet
Yeah I wrote that same thing, but like Brendio said grand mutations make no sense because they would be dysfunctional and offer no advantage, and would actually be a disadvantage for hundreds or thousands of generations. Things like fins and the such make sense because there's a linear growth and the effectiveness positively affects the organism's reproductive success
From research I have done personally, most theories/hypothesis on long term evolution/mutation over millions of years is nonsense for the most part, you'd be surprised how many scientists, even evolutionary biologists who have been studying this and have come to this conclusion, albeit it many too afraid to talk about it for fear of losing their careers/credibility.

Evolution is very real tho, so is genetic engineering, and eugenics, we are innately biological creatures, it's just for example, the eye, there is no fucking way the eye would ever happen, or for example a non winged creature to become a creature with wings naturally over millions of years, animals/humans are based on looks/lookism to a degree, many female animals if they see something slightly off or deformed about another animal they simply will not breed with that animal, we have tested this.

Grand mutations typically do not pass on, unless outside force allows it to happen, or rape possibly. Genetic engineering is also a big one. I could go into more depth and detail about this but it would have taken quite a bit longer to write out and I didn't want to be super articulate and autistic about it.
So what do you think then? I don't really get your point here
Great game tbh used to be top 60 at it I was one of the best in Europe jfl even signed up for a tournament
 
So what do you think then? I don't really get your point here
The most likely conclusion I have come to is that many species including ourselves were probably created by a super technologically advanced super civilization, genetically similar to ours. They probably have a king or something, and is probably what some ancient civilizations/religions referred to as God.

In my personal opinion it's probably the Christian God because the evil powers at be (Ashkenazi Jews) seem to have destroyed it/attacked it at a level that has never been seen before, and from my experience, anything that the Jews attack, especially on that level, is probably a good thing, and should be propped up in it's rawest and truest form.
 
I think you're talking about what creationists call irreducible complexity. The common answer to this is that most, if not all, of the small mutations that lead to something big like wings or eyes were actually useful in some way. I have no idea how insect wings evolved, though.
 
The most likely conclusion I have come to is that many species including ourselves were probably created by a super technologically advanced super civilization, genetically similar to ours. They probably have a king or something, and is probably what some ancient civilizations/religions referred to as God.

In my personal opinion it's probably the Christian God because the evil powers at be (Ashkenazi Jews) seem to have destroyed it/attacked it at a level that has never been seen before, and from my experience, anything that the Jews attack, especially on that level, is probably a good thing, and should be propped up in it's rawest and truest form.
I was just thinking in the past few days about artificial intelligence and how we create it to learn and stuff, so maybe some being whom we ended up mogging in intelligence created us but idk
I think you're talking about what creationists call irreducible complexity. The common answer to this is that most, if not all, of the small mutations that lead to something big like wings or eyes were actually useful in some way. I have no idea how insect wings evolved, though.
Oh yeah I've heard of that. They're like "this is really complicated so how could anything but God create it?" But ehh I'm not too sure tbh. Maybe it's just really unlikely but happened anyway, because there are probably hundreds of millions of these starting mutations happening which never get past the unusable stage, but wings and whatever just happened to randomly be bred until they were usable, but that'd probably be like a 1/1000000000 chance so hm
 
God is great

Fuck gay jew scientists
 
In my personal opinion it's probably the Christian God because the evil powers at be (Ashkenazi Jews) seem to have destroyed it/attacked it at a level that has never been seen before, and from my experience, anything that the Jews attack, especially on that level, is probably a good thing, and should be propped up in it's rawest and truest form.
many (almost every Christian I know) Christians say the Jewish and the Christian god are the same entity
 
Yeah but how do those with budding wings survive more than those without? They're not going to just randomly wake up with wings in one generation; they'll be undeveloped completely at first and unusable for hundreds of generations, so why are those with random lumps of flesh and carapace reproducing more than those with other adaptions?
Maybe these not-functional wings weren't so much of a hindrance that they couldn't reproduce and perhaps they could only do bigger jumps or stuff Idk, like grasshoppers.
 
Evolution of wings isn't that hard to imagine tbh, especially on insects (since they're relatively fall-resistant by default)
It could've started when some bug mutated a bit of a membrane between a pair of limbs and body, which allowed it to glide or something. The ability to glide proved to be useful and the mutation became dominant in the species, gradually improving various aspects like position of those limbs, the way they're built etc. eventually turning into what we call wings
 
imagine reading what bunny man posts
 
It's over for you
 

Similar threads

B
Replies
28
Views
502
Brainy
Brainy
aspergel syndrome
Replies
3
Views
140
InVideoGame
InVideoGame
Ghost Rider
Replies
27
Views
442
over_department
over_department
SecularNeo-Khazar
Replies
8
Views
240
SecularNeo-Khazar
SecularNeo-Khazar
DREAMEROFGREATNESS
Replies
10
Views
362
Starfish Vs Koala
Starfish Vs Koala

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top