"You can't miss what you never had"

[Righteous-Evil]

I know it's just normietrolls trying to get on your nerves. But how would you respond to such a fallacy argument?

 

[BummerDrummerOG]

Whenever anyone makes an argument or statement like that just replace "food" with "sex" or "a loving relationship" because they are as vital to life as food.
"You aren't entitled to sex"
"you aren't entitled to food"

 

[A_Broken_Person]

Whenever anyone makes an argument or statement like that just replace "food" with "sex" or "a loving relationship" because they are as vital to life as food.
"You aren't entitled to sex"
"you aren't entitled to food"

It's been proven to be on the same tier within the hierarchy of needs and everything

 

[FACEandLMS]

"So why do starving Somalian children miss food?"

"If I adopt a girl and raise her in a Fritzl-style basement, will she not miss freedom?"

But the argument could be made that 5 weeks without food would kill you whereas a lifetime without sex won't. True. But what is the point in life without meaning and happiness?

 

[Animecel2D]

And yet I have to spectate all the people around me in relationships, all the movies with romance, all the good looking and socially adjusted couples in social media. Society shoves it down my throat since childhood how much sex and relationships matter. Am I supposed to feel like I’m missing out? Of course I fucking am

 

[PPEcel]

You could apply that bullshit logic to:

A stable two-parent family
A safe neighborhood with good schools
Adequate healthcare
Your vision, sight, use of limbs

Imagine telling someone who grew up in a slum that he shouldn't wish to grow up in a nicer neighborhood because "he can't miss what he never had".

Or saying to a blind or deaf person that they shouldn't wish for the ability to see or hear because they never had that ability.

 

[Homoculus]

Humans are animals, no matter how much we deny it. Animals are driven by evolved instinct to do many things not necessarily to the benefit of the individual organism, for the sake of the species. They are also driven to do many things to the benefit that organism, from eating to snuggling to devoted mateship, as well as the species as a whole. To suggest humans won't miss things like love, freedom, autonomy, comradeship, and on and on, because they as individuals have not experienced them, is among the more stupid ideas I've run across recently. It's in our genes to crave such things.

 

[Izayacel]

Whenever anyone makes an argument or statement like that just replace "food" with "sex" or "a loving relationship" because they are as vital to life as food.
"You aren't entitled to sex"
"you aren't entitled to food"

god iq

 

[Heflecon]

"You can't be hungry for food you weren't allowed to eat bro!"

 

[RemoveNormalfags]

So a person in a wheelchair can't miss walking?

 

[chadalwayswins]

You could apply that bullshit logic to:

A stable two-parent family
A safe neighborhood with good schools
Adequate healthcare
Your vision, sight, use of limbs

Imagine telling someone who grew up in a slum that he shouldn't wish to grow up in a nicer neighborhood because "he can't miss what he never had".

Or saying to a blind or deaf person that they shouldn't wish for the ability to see or hear because they never had that ability.

High IQ

For a group who claim to want to help incels, IT (and normies for that matter) have very little sympathy or empathy for incels. Reserved for roasties only

 

[To_Live_is to_Serve]

I know it's just normietrolls trying to get on your nerves. But how would you respond to such a fallacy argument?

Better to have been loved and lost than to never have been loved at all.

 

[zangano1]

By punching them in the face, thats what they deserve

 

[speedtypingincel]

But we've had it. Our ancestors had it.

 

[GenGene]

Because sexual intimacy is a psychological need, not an ice cream flavor.