Total Imbecile said:
This makes me absolutely mad, if you show them data that they dont agree with they will spend hours arguing about methodology. No study is perfect.
Women are fairy braiders. They want existence to be acquiesced to their emotions, while they hold a strict cuntish criteria of inclusion/ intimacy that their humanitarianism is contradicted by. Women are stupid/ or just consistently geno-ingrained/ geno-patterned to never introspect that we are a racist/ tyrannical species. We care more about the primal hierarchy than being humanitarian and attempting to unite the human race in togetherness and compassion.
The self - esteem women want is not predicated on being a good person, but on being a total cunt bitch who succeeds in the shrewd realm of opposing physical forces, or social evaluation by which people glean you are of a demeanor/ identity of HIGHER status. Their fantasy/ aims are on that. Their self esteem is predicated and pendulumed/ pillared on whether they meet that supreme-primal-prodigy identity or not. Our self esteem is competitive based because we love to be superior. As a species nature also ordains this.
They act impatient, cuntish, stupid, myopic, philistine in their perceptions/ opinion/ knowledge base/ consideration system so that they come off like they are primal hierarchy demeanored. They demeanor themselves after a person who cares nothing for others, and gives off residual vibes of being high up in the primarchy by judging people's identity/merit PRIMARILY on the stratum of properties/ channel of traits SPECIFICALLY concerned with the primarchy (looks, money, status, competence, achievement, dominance, prominence, prowess, power). And yet they can still get by in life. Even if they are ethnic whores who are dumpster diving for primal credit, they can retain this type of selective snootness. Their judgment is pendulumed positively ONLY BY how close we are to a predation/ primal prowessed prodigy that can overtake all obstacles, and make all the circum-occurring trials/ tribulations of life seem trivial. Then they can use you as a stepping stone/ platform perch via tits and ass to entice the chad and the chad will be her frontman in her narcissistic satanic social monopoly. You are supposed to prove your MERIT AS A GIRL from the metric of how many HIGH LMS CHADS you can get. And you, male, are supposed to be someone she can manipulate, giving her a high value primarchial position from male traits. She is supposed to be lofty in the physical/ financial/ status/ masculine paternal dominance stratum/ meritlane/ rung of traits from your height, money, power, etc. Masculine Primal hierarchy ends up getting you used no matter what in our feminist society, unlike the days of the viking. Modern Masculine Primal Hierarchy mechanics pretty much make us lose out. It's a Matriarchical Primarchy now.
(Demeanorarchy). At the expense of being a good person, giving people happiness, etc. Nature wired them to be satanically discerning of our value because it's nature's eugenic aim for us to be people who put our abilities/ LMS/ prominence/ power/ prowess AHEAD of spiritual positivity. Sex is just the pull that pushes us to this line of thinking when you see its fundamentalism as a factor in getting laid.
Women only wanna look at whats luxuriant. They are brainlaced around luxuriant things in life. Luxurarchy. (Luxury hierarchy).
They do this becuase they don't wanna sacrifice their status acquisition momentum for the sake of being humanitarian. No sympathy or empathy for incels. It's very very hard for women to gain the will to course shift away from an emotional impulse. When they feel an emotional pressure they GUN IT like a rocket engine into the spiritual course of feeling; they can't temper what they feel with what they know, or influence themselves from going down the behavior course following emotions with the intervention of will from reason. They're very comfort oriented creatures. They'd rather not care because if they did they would go down the path of humanitarianism/ empathy... which makes their narcissistic/ primal gratifications at a loss. They're just choosing to altogether nip the bud of anything that could make them humanitarian/ deal with the stressful conflict of reconciling selfish gratification/ pursuits with making other people happy. So they'd rather just choose to go fully fledged into selfishness than create a balance of the two (stressful/ difficult(tempering emotional impulse with rationality) or go fully fledged into being humanitarian (unfun/ unrewarding/ ungratifying to selfish nature). If they did that they'd feel they'd live half lived lives if they went without status and prominence. They esteem THAT far MORE than seeing other people happy.
