Hypocrisy "You aren't entitled to sex Chud, but teen girls are entitled to good first sex."

[WorthlessSlavicShit]

Feminists and soys the moment they aren't telling you that you are human shit who's not entitled to anything, everything in your life is your own fault and in fact you barely even deserve to live:

Not Who You Are, But Who You Are With: Re-examining Women’s Less Satisfying Sexual Debuts

Gender differences in appraisals of first intercourse are among the largest in sexuality research, with women indicating less satisfying “sexual debuts” than men

I wish I had a "problem" like that.

Dispositional or “actor-level” explanations for this gender gap are pervasive, yet research has largely examined heterosexual debuts in which actor gender and partner gender are confounded. We assessed whether women’s less satisfying sexual debuts are better explained by actor gender or partner gender, comparing experiences of women who debuted with men (WDM) with those of men and women who debuted with women (MDW, WDW). Retrospective accounts of sexual debut were collected from 3033 adults. At first intercourse, we found that WDW had equal physical and emotional satisfaction to MDW, and more satisfaction than WDM, suggesting satisfaction gaps owing to partner gender, not actor gender.

"It's not our fault we aren't getting the good first sex we deserve!"

Sexual circumstances were more strongly implicated than nonsexual ones

But I thought women weren't about the physical, "carnal" parts of sex, and that emotional connection was what they craved and what made them satisfied?

with relative deprivation of glans stimulation explaining relative dissatisfaction at first intercourse, but not first masturbation, and orgasm explaining it at both. Findings challenge the view that the satisfaction gap at first intercourse reflects an inherent difference between genders. Indeed, they demonstrate similarities when partner gender does not differ and suggest strategies for ensuring equal sexual satisfaction—and equal sexual rights realization—at (hetero) sexual debut.

"Equal sexual rights realization" now, where have I heard similar ideas before?

Incels: "We demand equal realization of our sexual rights."

Society: "Holy shit, what bunch of entitled psychopaths! Women aren't your property, they are human beings who don't exist for your pleasure! Nobody is entitled to sex in any way!"

It's actually even crazier when you think about it. The guys here and on forums like this are just asking to have sex at all, no matter what it will be like, the only "requirement" is that we want it to be with a woman since we aren't faggots. Meanwhile, that study is specifically about sexual debut, about the first sex. There's already a crapload of other studies, articles and so on about how women's satisfaction with their sexual life increases with age (where the "Women sexually peak in their 40s" stuff comes from) as they find out what they want, how to communicate that with their partner, and so on. Basically, they "self-improoooov" until they reach the goal of a good sex life. Sounds familiar?

Well, those researchers don't want that, and they say that women are entitled to not having to self-improooov for a better sex life. We aren't entitled to any sex life at all, but women are entitled to a perfect, flawless one even from the very beginning, that same beginning which people always bring up to tell us that we shouldn't care about not having teen love and teen sex because "It's so awkward and unfulfilling, if only those inkwells knew how unsatisfying it is they wouldn't idolize it so much."

 

[FuckYou]

I fucking hate teenage girls man

 

[Balding Subhuman]

I'm almost convinced that the argument women throw around about men being entitled is entirely projection. Even when men aren't showing any signs of entitlement, women always use that argument, all the while they are the entitled ones. It seems that by default, you're not supposed to assume negative things about women, but you are very much allowed to assume the very worst things about men.

By default men are always guilty of something, women are never guilty of anything, even when evidence shows contrary. Women are entitled to being wined and dined, despite 100 years of feminism and the call for gender equality.

Anyone who has ever stepped outside has noticed that men aren't apparently entitled to anything, but women are entitled to have the whole world and the moon if they want that, and its usually the man's job to provide those things for her. And if he doesn't, then he's not a real man either.

 

[reveries]

These people really seem to enjoy studying teens' sexual experience what exactly was this "study" performed for, again?

 

[PersonalityChad]

Classic feminist hypocrisy, nothing surprises me anymore at this point

 

[m3nt4Lbl0ck3d]

wish I had a "problem" like that.

 

[ThisSongGoesVerHard]

For a man it doesn't take much to be sexually satisfied, because men actually are attracted to women and penile stimulation very easily leads to orgasm. But for a woman, even if she's sleeping with Chad, it's far more difficult, because the woman isn't particularly aroused by the man's body, can't usually orgasm by penetration, and frequently has trouble orgasming by clitoral stimulation. So, in order to satisfy her, the guy basically needs to be a mind reader and know the woman's body and what she likes better than she does. And apparently young women don't even know what they're into, so the men are tasked with a very difficult mission and then blamed for it.

Women even frequently fake orgasms, aren't honest about what they like, or don't even know it. So how the hell is the guy supposed to learn?

No shit that women who fuck other women have on average a better first experience, as they're more attracted to each other's bodies, and they are better experienced with the female body, as they have one of their own. I'm sure that gays have a more satisfying firdt experience in receiving better blowjobs, as the guys actually are into it and know how to pleasure a cock since they have one, and most importantly, they can match each other libidos. But you don't see men writing articles about this, accusing women of being useless or even bragging about how male homosexual encounters are better than heterosexual ones, because unlike women, we aren't the half homosexual, half asexual and pansexual mess that women are.

 

[Ahnfeltia]

Gee, who'da thunk getting pumped and dumped by Chad wouldn't make for a fulfilling first sexual experience?

 

[Ahnfeltia]

For a man it doesn't take much to be sexually satisfied, because men actually are attracted to women and penile stimulation very easily leads to orgasm. But for a woman, even if she's sleeping with Chad, it's far more difficult, because the woman isn't particularly aroused by the man's body, can't usually orgasm by penetration, and frequently has trouble orgasming by clitoral stimulation. So, in order to satisfy her, the guy basically needs to be a mind reader and know the woman's body and what she likes better than she does. And apparently young women don't even know what they're into, so the men are tasked with a very difficult mission and then blamed for it.

this sounds fairly reasonable as well

 

[SmhChan]

Entitles me.

 

[SmhChan]

For a man it doesn't take much to be sexually satisfied, because men actually are attracted to women and penile stimulation very easily leads to orgasm. But for a woman, even if she's sleeping with Chad, it's far more difficult, because the woman isn't particularly aroused by the man's body, can't usually orgasm by penetration, and frequently has trouble orgasming by clitoral stimulation. So, in order to satisfy her, the guy basically needs to be a mind reader and know the woman's body and what she likes better than she does. And apparently young women don't even know what they're into, so the men are tasked with a very difficult mission and then blamed for it.

Women even frequently fake orgasms, aren't honest about what they like, or don't even know it. So how the hell is the guy supposed to learn?

No shit that women who fuck other women have on average a better first experience, as they're more attracted to each other's bodies, and they are better experienced with the female body, as they have one of their own. I'm sure that gays have a more satisfying firdt experience in receiving better blowjobs, as the guys actually are into it and know how to pleasure a cock since they have one, and most importantly, they can match each other libidos. But you don't see men writing articles about this, accusing women of being useless or even bragging about how male homosexual encounters are better than heterosexual ones, because unlike women, we aren't the half homosexual, half asexual and pansexual mess that women are.

Don't even need to go a yap session. Foids are more co-operative in bed with other foids than with men. All this talk is just meaningless struggle on men's part and entertainment to foids.



Came across this video a long ago. Straight from the horse's mouth. She admits she doesn't want to say what gestures men perform that make them sexually attractive to foids because she doesn't want to give away any agency to the man.

 

[ThisSongGoesVerHard]

Don't even need to go a yap session. Foids are more co-operative in bed with other foids than with men. All this talk is just meaningless struggle on men's part and entertainment to foids.



Came across this video a long ago. Straight from the horse's mouth. She admits she doesn't want to say what gestures men perform that make them sexually attractive to foids because she doesn't want to give away any agency to the man.

Toilet sexuality is such a disgusting mess. Their attraction to men is hypergamic, fluid, contextual, unstable and contradictory. They don't even know or want to admit what they are into, but it's pretty obvious that a huge portion of their attraction depends on the man's projection of masculinity, which includes aspects that they often decry as being misogynistic and toxic, such as dominance, swagger, deception, etc. The allure to this projection of masculinity is so fragile that they often get the ick when the poor dude doesn't live up to the woman's contradictory expectations of both being a feminist ally and masculine protector daddy. On top of that they all have homosexual tendencies and their arousal to men highly depends on their autogynephilia and meta-attraction to their own selves that results from the relationship dynamics with the man (like feeling desired, being sexy, being smaller than him, etc).

One of the reasons why women's attraction to men is at an all time low is because men are pussy whipped, and deep down women aren't attracted to that. It's almost as if their feminist bs is a shit test and the men need to tell them to fuck off. But they wouldn't even be honest about it because telling the men that they need to be dominant would make men's dominance seem phony and they would get the ick.

Robot waifus can't come soon enough. Unlike toilets, men's expectations aren't utterly insane and contradictory, and we're easily satisfied - so they wouldn't need to be 100% identical to a perfect woman.

 

[femcelbreedingnig]

Men are entitled to femoid holes

 

[SmhChan]

Toilet sexuality is such a disgusting mess. Their attraction to men is hypergamic, fluid, contextual, unstable and contradictory. They don't even know or want to admit what they are into, but it's pretty obvious that a huge portion of their attraction depends on the man's projection of masculinity, which includes aspects that they often decry as being misogynistic and toxic, such as dominance, swagger, deception, etc.

I would say it's a biological privilege. I'm at a point in my life where I couldn't give a rat's ass about losing my virginity, romantic dates, or romantic lovemaking, basically any intimate activity with a foid. It's a pretty liberating feeling but it was a suicidal journey filled with loneliness and hatred. I just want to see foids reduced to starving African kids.

It's a huge fucking leg up for foids that they get it at birth which makes them impervious to opposite gender's manipulations. There's also the fact that human morality is far less forgiving to men's natural (physical) advantage than foids' smv advantage.

The allure to this projection of masculinity is so fragile that they often get the ick when the poor dude doesn't live up to the woman's contradictory expectations of both being a feminist ally and masculine protector daddy. On top of that they all have homosexual tendencies and their arousal to men highly depends on their autogynephilia and meta-attraction to their own selves that results from the relationship dynamics with the man (like feeling desired, being sexy, being smaller than him, etc).

I'd not be so charitable. Foids don't care if a guy is even a nazi if he is a chad. It's so palable with Ethnic foids. I'd say it's the whimsical nature of a psychopath, like a tyrant JBW from the days of slavery having a heart-to-heart with his black slave on a whim. Just pieces of shits at the end of the day.

Agree on homo tendencies, but I'd doubt that has anything to do with male attraction. I'd somewhat agree on the meta-attraction and relationship dynamics but it's hard to, given so many mid and ugly foids feel entitled to chads. I'd say it's just overexposure to shitty wattpad erotics where every male protag is a ripped chad.

A normie guy is usually taller than the foid, makes her more desired than chads, and all foids think of them as 10s. I'd go one step further, normie is usually a better provider, integral to the dynamic. It's just pure delusional objectification of the male by the foid. Makes you wonder how much of their decry about objectification of foids is just projection. But I digress.

It's the entitlement to a specific (perfect according to the femiurge) physical stature of a man and that perfection gives her more frequent orgasms. That man's moral character and financial stability matter very little to her as she can always bag a poor oofy-doofy to exploit. Their sexuality is just a perfect arrangement by the God himself to be the powerful victim.

These whimsical psychopaths are a net-negative on the society beyond their fertility as they breed more and more misery for everyone for their own entertainment and consume and live by far the most.

One of the reasons why women's attraction to men is at an all time low is because men are pussy whipped, and deep down women aren't attracted to that. It's almost as if their feminist bs is a shit test and the men need to tell them to fuck off. But they wouldn't even be honest about it because telling the men that they need to be dominant would make men's dominance seem phony and they would get the ick.

Yeah, but even if men became dominant naturally, the next day you'd be getting metoo'd, divorce-raped, or poisoned because you hurt her femiurge ego by treating her like a ragdoll in bed which she didn't mind initially because of her sexual high.

 

[DarkStar]

Rules for thee yet not for me

 

[The Scarlet Prince]

Not Who You Are, But Who You Are With: Re-examining Women’s Less Satisfying Sexual Debuts

There is no way this garbage requires me to pay money to see the 'study.' The fact this is a 'study' with citations is maybe the greatest waste of time I have ever seen come from the "scholars" of our society. This is further proof that these people need to be culled and we need to replace scientists with non-normgroids if we ever want to get anywhere ever again in our lifetimes.

 

[sexualeconomist]

Teen girls should be sold to the highest bidder