WW1 manlets.

[Deleted member 21883]

Looking at photographs and films of WW1, the average height was much lower. Yet they still had families, because of enforced monogamy.

 

[Deleted member 26140]

 

[Pengwin]

 

[SuccessfulShark]

Average height was also shorter back then

 

[Chetah]

It's more because of the absence of internet/dating apps/social media imo. In the 80s/90s those guys also had families.

 

[Tenshi]

View attachment 374560

 

[AmIjustDreaming]

View attachment 374560

 

[Incline]

Looking at photographs and films of WW1, the average height was much lower. Yet they still had families, because of enforced monogamy.

Tbh being a manlet in war is pretty beneficial tbh. Especially in trench warfare. Lifefuel for manlets.

 

[Lv99_BixNood]

They had literal manlet divisions: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bantam_(military)

 

[Ellviss]

View attachment 374560

 

[Deleted member 19971]

Average height was much lower back in 1914

 

[Mulattocel]

It wasn't enforced.

 

[Deleted member 28148]

They were chads cuz war heroes

 

[RemoveNormalfags]

Their deaths were so useless... just look at society right now.

 

[Lv99_BixNood]

We need another world war so that more men die off and the rest of us have a chance.

 

[VindalooCell]

We need another world war so that more men die off and the rest of us have a chance.

Nuclear war would be great for incels. I hope it happens.

 

[Deleted member 21883]

Anybody who has an antique eurotrash rifle can confirm from the very short length of pull (the shoulder to trigger hand distance) that they were optimized for manlets.

 

[Words2_live_bye]

It wasn't enforced.

 

[Deleted member 21883]

Yes it was.

 

[Deleted member 26923]

Nuclear war would be great for incels. I hope it happens.

 

[your personality]

They had literal manlet divisions: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bantam_(military)

A bantam, in British Army usage, was a soldier of below the British Army's minimum regulation height of 5 ft 3 in (160 cm).[1]

During the First World War, the British Army raised battalions in which the normal minimum height requirement for recruits was reduced from 5 ft 3 in (160 cm) to 5 ft (150 cm). This enabled shorter but healthy young men to enlist.

Bantam units enlisted from industrial and coal-mining areas where short stature was no sign of weakness. The name derives from the town of Bantam in Indonesia, from which a breed of small domestic fowl allegedly originated. Bantamweight was a weight category in boxing that had originated in the 1880s and had produced many notable boxers.

The first bantam battalions were recruited in Birkenhead, Cheshire, after Alfred Bigland, MP, heard of a group of miners who, rejected from every recruiting office, had made their way to the town. One of the miners, rejected on account of his size, offered to fight any man there as proof of his suitability as a soldier, and six men were eventually called upon to remove him. Bantam applicants were men used to physical hard work, and Bigland was so incensed at what he saw as the needless rejection of spirited healthy men that he petitioned the War Office for permission to establish an undersized fighting unit.

When the permission was granted, news spread across the country and men previously denied the chance to fight made their way to Birkenhead, 3,000 successful recruits being accepted for service into two new "Bantam battalions" in November 1914. The requirement for their height was between 4 ft 10 in (147 cm) and 5 ft 3 in (160 cm). Chest size was one inch (2.5 cm) more than the army standard.

The men became local heroes, with the local newspaper, The Birkenhead News, honouring the men of the 1st and 2nd Birkenhead Battalions of the Cheshires with enamel badges - "BBB" - "Bigland's Birkenhead Bantams". Soon renamed the 15th and 16th Battalions, Cheshire Regiment, they undertook gruelling training and served in some of the hardest-fought battles of the war, such as the Battle of Arras in 1917. Another bantam battalion was the 14th Battalion (West of England), the Gloucestershire Regiment, raised in 1915 and sent to France in 1916.[2] Eventually two whole divisions, the 35th and the 40th, were formed from "Bantam" men, who were virtually annihilated during the Battle of Bourlon. Heavy casualties, transfers to specialized Army tunneling companies and tank regiments, the introduction of conscription, and replacements by taller men, eventually led to Bantam units becoming indistinguishable from other British divisions.

Sidney Allinson has published a thorough study: The Bantams: The Untold Story of World War One.[3]

Brutal.

 

[Copexodius Maximus]

Their deaths were so useless... just look at society right now.

they don't care about us, it was good for them and that's al that matters

 

[Deleted member 19546]

It wasn't enforced.

Yes it was.