(title)
Experiment Would you cut 25 years off your life span to live as a chad for your remaining years ?
Of course, I wouldnt even think about this for more than 5 seconds. I already want to shorten my lifespan.
yep
Let me be a 45 year old gigachad millionaire and im golden
Probably yes tbh, unless those extra years were exactly what would allow me to live into the age of radical life extension.
Sure why not as life expectancy of Incel is not long
yeah, loneliness is known to reduce life expectancy
Knowing my luck I would just die and be buried as chad.
Depends of what my base life span is
how long you would theoretically live at the current moment.
Average lifespan is 80 let's say. I'd live till 55. I'd take it any day.
a lot of it depends on where you live and your current health.
what kinda question is this? it's the same vein of 100 boring years or 20 exciting (chad) years
A better question is what minimum age would you like to die to be chad. For that I'd say 55.
To be honest, living past 60 seems stupid, you are just kept alive on medications. By age 60, you have done your reproduction and raised your children. What point do you have? You are just a burden.
it depends on what you value too. If you value happiness, you would say yes. If you value longevity, you would say no.
Mhmmmm, I get what you mean
please @ anybody on here who values longevity over happiness
why would you value longevity?
Some people here may enjoy being alive, even though they may be in the minority
what kind of uber-cope is better then being a chad? JFL
If you live up to 150 that means you will barely be and look middle aged by the time you are 70
Lifespan is highly genetic as well.
I’d take that 100%. There are diminishing returns to living too long, for yourself and society at large. Let’s assume I’d die at 55 under this proposition, that’s still most of my life left to live happily. I could accomplish everything I want in that timeframe
Yes and what i mean is if you are going to live 150-160 years your whole life will be stretched longer so your development happens later, your maturity and your old age. So someone who can live up to 160 years will still be kinda young at 70
yes they would be
What a dumb question. Who cares about quantity of life if the quality isn't there.
r u serious of course lmao
Yes. I don't care. 100 years of misery, vs 50 years of happiness.
Hell, i'd even exchange it for 30 years. Make it a fast life strategy?
Hell, i'd even exchange it for 30 years. Make it a fast life strategy?
Im here for a good time, not a long time
Sadly I think this is opposite for me
Sadly I think this is opposite for me
D
no
Nope.
I'd cut 25 years or even half my lifespan to relive my childhood in the 90s, I had some bad moments, but I also had very good worthwhile moments, much better than the hellhole I'm in today.
No way I'm sacrificing my lifespan for foids...
I'd cut 25 years or even half my lifespan to relive my childhood in the 90s, I had some bad moments, but I also had very good worthwhile moments, much better than the hellhole I'm in today.
No way I'm sacrificing my lifespan for foids...
Based
Yes because life as an incel is not really living. The difference between mine and Chad's life is like night and day.
That would apply to everyone's life here
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
