would you commiemaxx if the communists supported redistribution of sex?

[mericks]

Let us suppose for the sake of discussion that communists weren't all hypocrites and they supported redistribution of sex in addition to wealth, healthcare, etc. Since we're only discussing hypotheticals, this can take any form you want it to, such as government-sponsored escort-maxxing or the government assigning sexual partners that people are required to fuck, or even government-arranged marriages. Would that then drive you to become a supporter of communism or socialism?

I personally would, I actually believe the world would be a better place if we had a government that distributed resources to those who need them instead of allowing homeless people to fester in the streets. The only reason I don't like communism is the blatant hypocrisy wherein they demand to take my money (of which I do have a lot) and redistribute it to poor people, but they don't force other people to provide me with that which I am unable to acquire by my own means; worse still, the American version of commies are SJWs who frequently flaunt their hatred for incels. And adding insult to injury, the US government actively rewards roasties for having sex with chad by providing them with free money to raise chad's offspring.

 

[Deleted member 18912]

That would be totally against human nature.
Better yet.
Just build a robot and it will be less forced, since women will not put up with this without gaining monetization for it.
You can´t remove hypergamy, no matter what system you put in place.

Even in the jungle, the female can stab you in the back the very moment you open your guard.

 

[Therapywasaaste]

I just want enforced monogamy and chastity.

 

[Caesercel]

I just want enforced monogamy and chastity.

 

[Gyros_Pretcel]

That would be totally against human nature.
Better yet.
Just build a robot and it will be less forced, since women will not put up with this without gaining monetization for it.
You can´t remove hypergamy, no matter what system you put in place.

Even in the jungle, the female can stab you in the back the very moment you open your guard.

That's why we need socialized looksmax and prostitution with gf experience for incels.

 

[Transcended Trucel]

no I have too much savings

 

[MarquisDeSade]

Let us suppose for the sake of discussion that communists weren't all hypocrites and they supported redistribution of sex in addition to wealth, healthcare, etc. Since we're only discussing hypotheticals, this can take any form you want it to, such as government-sponsored escort-maxxing or the government assigning sexual partners that people are required to fuck, or even government-arranged marriages. Would that then drive you to become a supporter of communism or socialism?

I personally would, I actually believe the world would be a better place if we had a government that distributed resources to those who need them instead of allowing homeless people to fester in the streets. The only reason I don't like communism is the blatant hypocrisy wherein they demand to take my money (of which I do have a lot) and redistribute it to poor people, but they don't force other people to provide me with that which I am unable to acquire by my own means; worse still, the American version of commies are SJWs who frequently flaunt their hatred for incels. And adding insult to injury, the US government actively rewards roasties for having sex with chad by providing them with free money to raise chad's offspring.

I voted no simply for the fact that foids are vaginally capitalistic where it is an impossibility to socialize their sexually reproductive behaviors for a majority of men. The first form of capitalism in existence was that which sprung out of the first woman's legs where it has been that way ever since. Sexual capitalism predates economic capitalism and I sometimes wonder if the idea of economic capitalism was given life just by observing foids in their natural habitat. Foids are the ultimate capitalists as their entire lives are capitalistic in virtually everything they do, their entire existence revolves around social capital especially regarding all sexual transactions or interactions.

If you look at the U.S.S.R. , did all the hot Russian women go after the simple and poor Russian guys working the factories as the laboring proletariats? No, of course not. They were all banging the Russian politburo, vanguard, or members of the inner political party.

The only way to redistribute pussy is by force, something of which only a monarch, warlord, theocrat, or fascist autocrat can achieve politically.

 

[XG5ttL]

Better dead than red anyway.
Would feel miserable to get my state-provided gf meanwhile chad gets them easily with well...just existing how he does perhaps.
It is just not what I want, I want love and all that stuff, not some cheap meat to fuck. What is the point of having someone, if she would run away instantly given the opportunity?

That would be totally against human nature.
Better yet.
Just build a robot and it will be less forced, since women will not put up with this without gaining monetization for it.
You can´t remove hypergamy, no matter what system you put in place.

Even in the jungle, the female can stab you in the back the very moment you open your guard.

this

 

[AllanKing]

I am already a commie

 

[senses fail]

I'd like to believe my views hold more weight but no, I'd commiemaxx for sure if it meant state enforced waifu.

 

[Deleted member 15737]

[UWSL]Social justice and women's lib is a communist idea and forcing women into sex slavery would be against those things. If communist take over, it would be an authoritarian hellhole and most of us would be sent to gulags or forced to work as janitors. NEETbux would be non-existent. [/UWSL]

 

[Julaybib]

commiecels must seize the goods of reproduction