Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Experiment Would you be happy with a woman who loved you romantically, but would not have sex with you?

What she lacks in sex, she makes up for in romance.


  • Total voters
    77
FrothySolutions

FrothySolutions

Post like the FBI is watching.
★★★★★
Joined
May 6, 2018
Posts
19,847
To not sway the results I will not say much else here.
 
Yes, of course. I could still jerk off.
 
Sorry, I'm not a cuck. NOPE
 
As long as I can fap 2her... Ok.
 
Fuck no.

Romance without sex can't exist.

That's a platonic relationship.
 
Well, as a teen I would not exactly pressure my gf to have sex with me or anything.
 
Well, as a teen I would not exactly pressure my gf to have sex with me or anything.

She will never have sex with you. Not when you're old enough for it, never.
 
I would strongly suspect her of cucking me with Chad and not be happy.
 
No. A women’s emotional commitment and bond means nothing without sex and mutual attraction.

There are women who have casual sex with men whom they don’t care for and look to lock up and postpone sex for those they want to commit. They believe their commitment is more valuable than their bodies.
 
If she doesnt have sex with you she doesnt love you. Unless she is phisically unable to have sex but still no
 
- Loves you
- Won't have sex with you

Pick one
 
nope i would not be happy with this
 
What do you mean? She doesn't want to have sex with you or can't have sex with you? And how can she love me if she's not physically attracted to me. It's like asking to be cucked over time.
 
fuck no, might as well download an ai girlfriend app and get a fleshlight.
 
of course not
 
To not sway the results I will not say much else here.
Better than nothing i guess ...
But its really unrealistic , cause Sex is a big part of that thing you call " Love " , maybe even the biggest part by far .
In the End its all about Genetics and Sex is the ultimate gratification of our self worth .

.....

But i personally would be content with having such a relationship , cause i like to be a celibate in all honesty .
i feel better when i am on no fap and i guess regular sex would have the same negative effect as masturbation .
Im the type of person to use their Sexual frustration and convert than energy into something creative or just use that extra energy to gymcell .
It would be ther perfect realtionship for me if she would love me without sex , cause i want to be a celibate all while still having the emotional gratification .

But sadly no foid would consent to such a relationship , cause in the End -
Love = Sex = Genetics .
Love is an invention , its all just physical .
 
Only if she were a kissless virgin under 14 years of age.
 
No but I wouldn’t require frequent sex.
 
When my penis is hard I need to bust and if she won't help me she don't love me
 
Yeah, i'll just escortmaxx for the sex and then beat the prostitute to get my money back



in GTA V
 
Honestly, no.

But maybe if she 'd let me cope wth escorts on the side...
 
It's definitive in this theoretical situation here that she loves and cares for me. I would go for it.
 
Yes. Maybe I'm the minority of incels here, but that's all I want. I mean, if I good get a fuck buddy relationship, I would take it in a heartbeat. But I would also absolutely accept a loving relationship, even without sex. I can always jerk the ween to fulfill that void. But a woman who loves me romantically? That would fill the void in my heart. I just want love :(
 
There is no romantic love without sex. Get that through your heads.
 
1/3 of people voted Yes. JFL at the state of this forum.
 
Sex is an important part of any relationship. Partners should be able to engage on sexual activity when they desire, if your girl does not want to have sex with you. She is most likely using you for your money and cuking you
 
Constant bluebells? Yeah pure bliss
 
Voted yes tbh.


Inb4 OP says she still gets a sexual release which in that case then no.
 
i think thats called a cuck
 
@FrothySolutions
Romance without sex can't exist.

That's a platonic relationship.

This is why the thread confuses me, because if a woman has romantic interest in you, there would be sexual attraction, a relationship without sex is by default platonic, how is this relationship you propose any different than being friendzoned?, it isn't, its just a friendship.

You could rephrase this entire thread as - "Would you have a female friend if you could?"
 
This is just friendzone with some steps of dating larp. When there's romantic love, there's sex. Just like us can't make up our physical unattractiveness in other field, there's no making up of sex in romance
 
I read the title. And then I read it again to make sure I didn't make a mistake.

I don't get it.

This doesn't make any sense at all.

It just doesn't.

But yes. Well, I wouldn't be happy about it, but it would be a step up from my current position, and I'd be stupid not to take it.

By the way, she's willing to do everything short of sex? I mean, if you ask the 42nd POTUS, "sexual relations" includes giving oral sex but not receiving oral sex -- so does it mean I am allowed to receive oral sex in this hypothetical circumstance?
 
No sex no relationship.
 
is that not a contradiction?
 
Voted naw although its a wrong question.if. Woman is romantically attracted to you she will definitely have sex with you.the threads that are like'imagine u wake up as a chad next morning' are more likeable to happen
 
Yes but only if she doesn't cheat on me.

If she's asexual I can accept that tbh.
 
No. How would that be different from being incel?
 
The way the question is presented, it would imply that she would have to have either some physical disability or deep psychological issue that would prevent her from having sex, since a girl that loves you romantically would obviously want to pleasure you and would also love to be pleasured by you.

Having a loving gf and no sex is infinitely better than having no gf and no sex, so I'd definitely be happier than I'm now. But whether I'd be happy enough would depend on how far we could go before it would be considered sex. Anything above naked make out / full-body-massages would probably be good enough to make me happy.
 

Similar threads

M
Replies
40
Views
554
SocialOutkast95
SocialOutkast95
Gendocel
Replies
32
Views
424
incalculable
incalculable

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top