Discussion would there still be incels if the male to female ratio was one male to 50 female

[pussyseller]

basically the title

 

[Yabadadabadoo]

No

 

[KHHVcel]

Yes. Foids are chad only whores.

 

[Animecel2D]

I would still be incel even if I was the only man in the world

 

[weaselbomber]

yes but far fewer

 

[m3nt4Lbl0ck3d]

Ofc

 

[PersonalityChad]

Probably yes, they would just be far less common though

 

[cripplecel]

Yarrr

 

[Ryo_Hazuki]

Yes, women would rather be alone than be with an ugly man. They'd just date each other, or not at all.

Also while "what if women outnumbered men dramatically" is something a lot of men fantasize about, they do so through a VERY thick lens of male fantasy. So not only would ugly men still be incel....but there would be many other implications.

Think about how radically different society would be if women were 98 percent of the population. Think about the socio-political implications of women making up almost all of the electorate. You'd have a president and 100 senators who are all tiktok 4th wave feminists/misandrists. They could do anything they wanted, you think "muh constitution" is gonna stop them? lol.

Men would be enslaved for labor. Enslaving men would be the only way to maintain such a society since we all know women aren't going to be working on the oil rigs, doing construction, etc. Even then it's a long-shot since the jobs women won't (and physically can't) do are far than 2 percent of the workforce.

 

[HaruCel]

Yes. Barely anything would change

 

[Paladin]

yes but far fewer

 

[Friezacel]

Yes, women would rather be alone than be with an ugly man. They'd just date each other, or not at all.

Also while "what if women outnumbered men dramatically" is something a lot of men fantasize about, they do so through a VERY thick lens of male fantasy. So not only would ugly men still be incel....but there would be many other implications.

Think about how radically different society would be if women were 98 percent of the population. Think about the socio-political implications of women making up almost all of the electorate. You'd have a president and 100 senators who are all tiktok 4th wave feminists/misandrists. They could do anything they wanted, you think "muh constitution" is gonna stop them? lol.

Men would be enslaved for labor. Enslaving men would be the only way to maintain such a society since we all know women aren't going to be working on the oil rigs, doing construction, etc. Even then it's a long-shot since the jobs women won't (and physically can't) do are far than 2 percent of the workforce.

Only good reply under this thread

 

[Dead™Inside]

Depends on societal customs, actually. If polygamy became socially acceptable, it'd simply give the top 10% a convenient excuse to keep harems (top 10% would have two to three wives, top 1% would have hundreds). Then nothing would change, if anything female hypergamy would become even more apparent.

But if such society retains christian tradition of strict monogamy, that would certainly be interesting.

 

[autistandugly]

I would still be incel even if I was the only man in the world

 

[BlackPilledNormi]

Well betabuxxing would work better because women would have to take what the get to be safe for the future. But if your 1/10 it would still be ovER for you