E
The only way the European can be criticized is through economic psychology, obviously they will claim up and down that their form of social democracy is superior to free market ideals, unaware that their innate desire to accompany all sorts of people under the tree of “humanity” notwithstanding, unable to understand the right to exclusion so foreign to their soil as its stands. This mentality disallows any sort of rendering of properties to private individuals, even to the extent of large families which they claim to endear to so well, that since Rousseau stated in the discourses that land belongs to no one, hence, it belongs to everyone, including those who might not share in their ways of life (religious, or lackthereof, cuisine, language, folkways, greetings, etc etc) insomuch it ends up turning their backyards into playgrounds for the desolate, where each legislature by higher law, since those in charge (they don’t feel in charge, either) exhibit the same psychology as their subjects ends up putting everyone (rulers and subjects) at the mercy of outsiders. Their nations have decided that women and men are on equal footing, that there is no innate differences between the sexes, and since they have exhausted their resources to chase progress at all cost, have decided to impose these values on Americans (no doubt by people who here at home who want to finish the project that has been successful, at least on the surface, never mind what actually happened) so we may become a discount version of current day Europe. Never would they exclaim, “I own this, this is mine, this is not yours, nary anyone should touch”. If they did, then they would be justified in keeping their system intact. But on the contrary, they do not, and should be patronized for it.
