Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Toxic Femininity Women's sexual power has taken over social opinion (THREAD)

AdExpress

AdExpress

Recruit
★★★★
Joined
Jun 18, 2025
Posts
359

View: https://x.com/nypost/status/1928561162720866646


So recently I remember seeing this video of prisoners in jail who killed a sex offender which is now standard protocol for inmates so to speak, the concept of killing these cruel and sadist sexual predators who don't deserve to live. To put it short the whole concept of this is fucked and proves just how much women have control over public and social opinion once they have sexual power.

I mean the whole purpose of it is that these sexual predators in particular are above and beyond the worst of human society to the point where prisoners are expected to sacrifice any chance they have at leaving the prison faculty to kill these guys. But okay maybe the people killing them are only in there for a year or two for petty theft or doxxing right?


1751482014405


NOPE they KILLED PEOPLE. To make it worse the guy in there was only in there for 35 weeks, so we can assume the crime comitted wasn't statutory rape of a 10 year old or something. I mean imagine believing that you, someone who ended human life, is so morally superior to a minor sex convict that you kill them for it.

It is to my belief that this moral superiority is not innate, but rather placed on them by social opinion driven by women. This year alone there have been 100+ cases of female teachers comitting statutory rape with students in the US however we never hear the "I hope the female prisoners kill them" or "a good pedophile is a dead pedophile" mantra this is ONLY for men on women. Even more surprisingly men also internalise this and go further with the "I wish she was around when I was younger" and "he really fumbled a baddie" but simultaneously believing a female student wouldn't have similarly wanted it from a male teacher, as if the only thing that matters is how women are negatively affected.

This isn't the only place in which the safety of women seem to dominate the majority opinion on a topic, in fact in every single one whether from a leftist or rightist perspective the primary focus is on how is this more safer for women.

Immigration? It's bad because uh uh, they're raping our women on the street
Transgenderism? It's bad because uh uh, they're raping our women in bathrooms
Islam? It's bad because uh uh, they're raping our women in gangs

1751483289840


Firstly these speaks volumes of women's priorities that the only way to get them to care about basic political policies is to threaten them by the insemnation of a sub 8 (ethnic) male but instead zeroing in on how this might tie into the sexual market i formerly referenced. We all know since the sexual revolution and later the addition of social media women's control on the dating market has increased and now they pretty much have an extremely dictatorship like grip on it so that if you aren't worthy they will not only take you out the market but ban you from expressing sexual desires at all by:

- Being against prostitution
- Being against porn
- Being against AI girlfriends
- Being against sex tourism

The bottom 80% men have subconsciously realised just how much power women really have and how little they have now and are so desperate for pussy and so scared to have this taken away from them they blindly follow every single thing women push for in order in the belief that a woman might let him stick his dick in her if he does this to the point they are scared to hit a woman back who is beating him up because they do not want to be called a "mysogynist".

1751483181366


Sprinkle in the legal laws reflecting this sexual power extended to social opinion that will jail you for saying something bad about a woman and you have a full on gynocracy. And to be quite frank I really really hate this
 
excellent post. I agree completely. It's ridiculous that taking another man's life is seen as less severe than raping a woman. Unfortunately, it's not surprising. Look at our media and entertainment. Male serial killers who only target other men are glorified. The male fantasy is killing another men to win female approval. The female fantasy is having an attractive man kill unattractive men.


Humans are worthless animals bound by their instincts and the only solution is extinction via a plague or prion disease. I very much doubt a meteor will grace us.
 
. The male fantasy is killing another men to win female approval. The female fantasy is having an attractive man kill unattractive men.
Damn it this is too real and too depressing I really hate human nature
 
Also thanks this is my first attempt at a thread that's isn't a few sentences long
 
Also thanks this is my first attempt at a thread that's isn't a few sentences long
it's a great post! Unfortunately, the literacy of this forum has gone down over the years.
 
Indeed. The elevation of sex "crimes" above all others is standard gynocentrism and cuckery. JFL that sticking your penis in someone is viewed as much worse than sticking a knife in somebody.
 
Indeed. The elevation of sex "crimes" above all others is standard gynocentrism and cuckery. JFL that sticking your penis in someone is viewed as much worse than sticking a knife in somebody.
only cause women psychologically evolved to hate having to reproduce with an aunattractive male's (sub 9) baby via rape so they try to impose that view on us but that risk doesn't exist with men, a man won't give birth if it happens men only say it in fear of women disapproving. The catch being if you're objectively attractive women don't care about your view on that to not want to have sex with you and vice versa if you're unattractive
 
only cause women psychologically evolved to hate having to reproduce with an aunattractive male's (sub 9) baby via rape so they try to impose that view on us but that risk doesn't exist with men, a man won't give birth if it happens men only say it in fear of women disapproving. The catch being if you're objectively attractive women don't care about your view on that to not want to have sex with you and vice versa if you're unattractive
That biological burden has been passed onto men since the '60s, since women gained reproductive autonomy, with the pill and abortion. It's now men who bear the reproductive risk from sex. And this elevation of sex crimes is a very recent thing, even 20-30 years ago it wasn't viewed as such a major crime. It's just feminism and women gaining more and more privileges, with every passing year.
 
That biological burden has been passed onto men since the '60s, since women gained reproductive autonomy, with the pill and abortion. It's now men who bear the reproductive risk from sex. And this elevation of sex crimes is a very recent thing, even 20-30 years ago it wasn't viewed as such a major crime. It's just feminism and women gaining more and more privileges, with every passing year.
thing is the thread isn't even necessarily about how bad sex crimes are but how women view them and are able to get men to view them the same way with the threat of witholding sex which is their only agency. But yes murder is worse than a singular sex crime it's crazy how public perception has shifted so gynocratic
 
thing is the thread isn't even necessarily about how bad sex crimes are but how women view them and are able to get men to view them the same way with the threat of witholding sex which is their only agency. But yes murder is worse than a singular sex crime it's crazy how public perception has shifted so gynocratic
Just a few hours ago I scrolled past a story about "sex offender" men in a prison committing suicide, and it had laugh emojis in response. In the UK, we have Jimmy Saville, whose crimes were an open secret for decades, and viewed as a joke. Then, 10-20 years ago, everyone suddenly had to start pretending his crimes were akin to those of Saddam Hussein. Most of them were snogging 15 and 16 year old girls. There are loads of instances of rock stars banging jailbait girls in the 70s and 80s. Now we're supposed to pretend that was a heinous crime.
 
Just a few hours ago I scrolled past a story about "sex offender" men in a prison committing suicide, and it had laugh emojis in response. In the UK, we have Jimmy Saville, whose crimes were an open secret for decades, and viewed as a joke. Then, 10-20 years ago, everyone suddenly had to start pretending his crimes were akin to those of Saddam Hussein. Most of them were snogging 15 and 16 year old girls. There are loads of instances of rock stars banging jailbait girls in the 70s and 80s. Now we're supposed to pretend that was a heinous crime.
damn it this is so annoying how this all happens out of our control we just have to sit back and let the world move in whatever way and continue getting fucked I hope there's a breaking point eventually
 
Read every word.
 
only cause women psychologically evolved to hate having to reproduce with an aunattractive male's (sub 9) baby via rape so they try to impose that view on us
Foids don't care about babies. Foids abort, choke, and drown chad's babies all the time. Honestly, this evo-psycho explanation is more often so pretentious. Foids are just acting on their power. That's it.
Edit: And Nigga, men oppose rapists not because of muh gynocracy. You do fucking realize, your foid relatives would be at risk if rape sentences were loose. From what I have seen men only support pedophile men getting killed in prison.
 
Last edited:
damn it this is so annoying how this all happens out of our control we just have to sit back and let the world move in whatever way and continue getting fucked I hope there's a breaking point eventually
The only solution is to leave. Leave the west and let it rot. Go to a more traditional country where men are respected.
 
Excellent. You put into words something I have had on my mind for a while now.

Someone please call the mods to pin this shit. Might add a few comments if inspiration strikes.
 
That biological burden has been passed onto men since the '60s, since women gained reproductive autonomy, with the pill and abortion. It's now men who bear the reproductive risk from sex. And this elevation of sex crimes is a very recent thing, even 20-30 years ago it wasn't viewed as such a major crime. It's just feminism and women gaining more and more privileges, with every passing year.
Men had always carried a portion of the risk. We don't live in jungles. Men for the most part were always held responsible for impregnating a foid. Men would always seek out a foid for more than just her body, to pair-bond. The cucked evo-psycho bs explanation (muh foids evolved to be hypergamous for their "offspring") is just a post-hoc rationalization to mask the fact that it's FOIDS who always sought males who were philandering and irresponsible scums.
 
The only solution is to leave. Leave the west and let it rot. Go to a more traditional country where men are respected.
eventually I will I'm only in the UK for university but I'll move outside for a job oppurtunity. although even muslim countries are becoming more and more socially liberal just slower but seems impossible to stop
 
Men had always carried a portion of the risk. We don't live in jungles. Men for the most part were always held responsible for impregnating a foid. Men would always seek out a foid for more than just her body, to pair-bond. The cucked evo-psycho bs explanation (muh foids evolved to be hypergamous for their "offspring") is just a post-hoc rationalization to mask the fact that it's FOIDS who always sought males who were philandering and irresponsible scums.
Well, civilisation is a tiny blip in our evolution. Also, we're talking about the biological burden of pregnancy, not hypergamy. Pregnancy used to be highly dangerous, women had a good chance of dying during birth. Women seeking dominant males is also evolutionary, because our natural state is harems. The dominant males having a harem of females, not the one man, one woman modern setup we're accustomed to-- that's a "patriarchal" construct. And it's one which has been torn down in the last 10 years.
 
eventually I will I'm only in the UK for university but I'll move outside for a job oppurtunity. although even muslim countries are becoming more and more socially liberal just slower but seems impossible to stop
True, even China has been fucked by feminism.
 
Foids are nothing
 
Well, civilisation is a tiny blip in our evolution. Also, we're talking about the biological burden of pregnancy, not hypergamy. Pregnancy used to be highly dangerous, women had a good chance of dying during birth. Women seeking dominant males is also evolutionary, because our natural state is harems. The dominant males having a harem of females, not the one man, one woman modern setup we're accustomed to-- that's a "patriarchal" construct. And it's one which has been torn down in the last 10 years.
Pregnancy was as dangerous as anything in life back then. A small disease, considered curable today, could wipe out a town back then.
Well, if you want to be part of a harem, you gotta bear the burden of single motherhood.
 
Pregnancy was as dangerous as anything in life back then. A small disease, considered curable today, could wipe out a town back then.
Well, if you want to be part of a harem, you gotta bear the burden of single motherhood.
They didn't have to bear the burden of single Motherhood, in nature, because humans lived like chimps do, in communities. Everyone took care of the kids, including the incel simp males. And, in modern society, men have to take care of the children via taxes and all kinds of labour.
 
They didn't have to bear the burden of single Motherhood, in nature, because humans lived like chimps do, in communities. Everyone took care of the kids, including the incel simp males. And, in modern society, men have to take care of the children via taxes and all kinds of labour.
No, they didn't. The single mothers resorted to some of the most disgusting sexual acts to put a loaf of bread on the table. Add to the fact, they were ostracized from the society. Note, I'm talking about a civilization, not some ooga-booga tribe.
 
No, they didn't. The single mothers resorted to some of the most disgusting sexual acts to put a loaf of bread on the table. Add to the fact, they were ostracized from the society. Note, I'm talking about a civilization, not some ooga-booga tribe.
Again, civilisation is almost irrelevant to evolution and then nature of women, as it's approximately 0.000000000000001% of our species' existence. But yes, that's why men created marriage. To mitigate women's nature and biology. Men got sex and a motivation to be productive, women got taken care of. That was the deal and the paradigm.
 

Similar threads

Misogynist Vegeta
Replies
6
Views
499
Shay Patrick Cormac
Shay Patrick Cormac
Misogynist Vegeta
Replies
11
Views
1K
Stupid Clown
Stupid Clown
Misogynist Vegeta
Replies
14
Views
665
Kamanbert
Kamanbert
DeathSigil
Replies
6
Views
503
DeathSigil
DeathSigil
foids destroyer
Replies
22
Views
822
Spooky_Heejin
Spooky_Heejin

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top