Serious Women message men whom they consider below average more than any other group of men

[Deleted member 10531]

This was a study by OkCupid, which found out that women message men they find to be 2/5 in looks more than any other group of men. Why is this? Isn't this contradictory to everything else we have found to be true? Shouldn't this trend be the opposite, where women message attractive men more than unattractive men.

 

[ThouShallObeyKing]

they make fun of them and collect orbiters

 

[starystulejarz]

that's bullshit if that was the case i'd be showered with messages since i'm below average

 

[Atavistic Autist]

They use unattractive jestermaxxers to gain amusement, whereas attractive men just grunt "dtf?" and that's the extent of it.

 

[horseshoe]

This was a study by OkCupid, which found out that women message men they find to be 2/5 in looks more than any other group of men. Why is this? Isn't this contradictory to everything else we have found to be true? Shouldn't this trend be the opposite, where women message attractive men more than unattractive men.

There’s a key difference between a first contact message and a response to a sub 8 man with one liners e.g. “hi”, “what?”, “fuck off subhuman” after a paragraph of said man trying some jestermaxx opener.

 

[mybodyisrotting]

It depends on what the "messaging" statistics actually means. If it shows the total number of messages sent then it makes perfect sense - all that Chad needs to say is "Hey bby if you want sum fuk call me XXX-XXX-XXXX", while the uglier guys need weeks of jestermaxxing to convince a foid to go out with him.
Also note that most of the messages are still sent to dudes that are 5+/10. They just consider a 5/10 guy to be about 2.5/10

 

[Rassimov]

Similar thing happened to me. But I suspect I could get hammered if I share the bizarre tale.

 

[YogiBear]

They just need egomaxx first so they reply. 99% men get more messages than 1% of chads. You stupid inkwels come on register and buy premium.

 

[78980n]

they make fun of them and collect orbiters

this

If it shows the total number of messages sent then it makes perfect sense - all that Chad needs to say is "Hey bby if you want sum fuk call me XXX-XXX-XXXX", while the uglier guys need weeks of jestermaxxing to convince a foid to go out with him.

and this

 

[Insomniac]

chads = truecels

 

[Cuyen]

they make fun of them and collect orbiters

 

[Durbis]

Seems kinda bullshit tbh. I doubt they actually go anywhere with those guys.

 

[Ghost]

View attachment 144016


This was a study by OkCupid, which found out that women message men they find to be 2/5 in looks more than any other group of men. Why is this? Isn't this contradictory to everything else we have found to be true? Shouldn't this trend be the opposite, where women message attractive men more than unattractive men.

Those guys are all chadlite or hi tier normie... Not "average"...

They all mog me...

If its over for them what more with me...

 

[Gyros_Pretcel]

They rate most of the men as ones and twos. Those men they message may be a four [2] on their 1 to 10 [1 to 5] scale, but are already in the 60th percentile of looks and chadlites.

 

[Alone75]

Not true for my location.

 

[needsolution]

that's bullshit if that was the case i'd be showered with messages since i'm below average

its obv foid's lie, they lying about everything everytime

 

[Dark-Hatred]

Seems kinda bullshit tbh.

 

[starystulejarz]

its obv foid's lie, they lying about everything everytime

they lie even about lying JFL

 

[needsolution]

they lie even about lying JFL

idk how even they are called human race, they are worse sort of animals
my dog is 100000 times more honest than them

 

[DeepSea]

View attachment 144016


This was a study by OkCupid, which found out that women message men they find to be 2/5 in looks more than any other group of men. Why is this? Isn't this contradictory to everything else we have found to be true? Shouldn't this trend be the opposite, where women message attractive men more than unattractive men.

Their factual assertions don't match their conclusions - they mean that a third of guys' messages are being distributed between two-thirds of the girls, but if each guy is messaging many girls, then it's likely that each girl in those bottom two-thirds is still getting many messages.

Example of what I mean mathematically: imagine we have 99 men and 99 women. Say the top 33 women get one message each from every man. That's 99 messages each, 3267 total. If this is 2/3 of the total messages, then the other 66 women receive about 1634 messages between them, which is still about 25 each. As the below chart shows, the most unattractive women on OkCupid receive more messages per week than the vast majority of men.

In the blog post, they were just striving to make their findings more palatable to women because 1. The political climate these days demands subservience to women's emotional sensibilities, and 2. Women are the primary driver of revenue for their site.

 

[failmaxxed]

Below average guys are a lot more likely to get them a free lunch than a chad, or orbit them etc.

 

[Hapacelricecel]

For free meals

 

[Deleted member 20207]

Does that mean I am Chad since women never message me?

But seriously,

they make fun of them and collect orbiters

 

[Rassimov]

Does that mean I am Chad since women never message me?

But seriously,

They are out to get one thing from them: validation. If you're good enough that she want's you compliments, then you make it clear that you're good enough to fuck her hard.

 

[Monk of Failure]

Actually, the 2/5 looking guys they message more are upper tier normies not your real below average looking guys.

 

[NotQuiteChadLite]

Chadcels on suicide watch

 

[Speed]

There's more Norman's than Chad's so it comes to reason they would have a higher correspondence with Norman's. Chad just has to say "Want sum fuck" and its gameover.

 

[mylifeistrash]

I'll translate soy speak for you:

message = reply with one word responses to jesters who send retarded long winded jokes

below average = below giga-chad

 

[Deleted member 19546]

Because women CALL Chads and talk to them irl.

 

[RandomGuy]

Free chicken tenders.

 

[Arch Anemone]

When you rate 80 percent of men worse than average it is easy to message an 80 percentile man who falls under that category.

It is an an artifact of how poorly women rate men and how fairly men rate women.

It is like giving a women a head start in a race and completely negating it in the results.

When a 40 percentile woman messages a 80 percentile guy she is still messaging a man rated lower than her because of this poor rating of men.

If you believe an average man should be with an average women, in the eyes of women you are rating them unfairly.

 

[LonelyDreamer]

On top of previous replies, which suggest mockery and meal solicitation, I guess foids (the +25y ones) are seeking beta bucks from OKC.

BB doesn't need to be attractive, only his resources matter.

 

[Deleted member 21219]

For free meals

In all seriousness, its part of their dual mating strategy.

Look for genetic value : Chads
Look for material value : Cucks/Betabuxors

With chads, sex is mutual. With cucks, the sex is highly transactional. Foids spreading their legs for money and resources is downright disgusting. They are all prostitutes at the end of the day and all of us gentlemen are morally superior to these disgusting whores.

 

[skohlkal]

Women never message men, this data is skewed because of catfishing and bots.

 

[The Incel Decade]

Let's break this down:

Most women are showered in attention, compliments, matches, messages on a daily basis without having to initiate anything.

Women who contact first are a section of the bottom 20% and the bottom 20% are more likely to message chad-lite than giga chad. Women rate 80% of men unattractive, so the guy she messages with is still better than average (i.e. Chad-lite) because average is the medium - the man in the middle of 10 people - not the 2 out of every 10 she rates as above average.

 

[Deleted member 21219]

Women never message men, this data is skewed because of catfishing and bots.

They message only chads.

 

[Lester]

Why is this? Isn't this contradictory to everything else we have found to be true? Shouldn't this trend be the opposite, where women message attractive men more than unattractive men.

I stopped trying to understand this shit a long time ago.