Blackpill Women Having Rights Is The Reason There's A Caste System Based on Male Facial Attractiveness In Western Society

[universallyabhorred]

When one group gains power they use it to oppress and destroy another group. It's human nature to punch down especially against those with unattractive faces, merely because of the deviled horns effect, which people, primarily women choose to judge someone's personality based on their facial attractiveness. With women free to be in the workplace and all social spaces, there's no place those with unattractive male faces can seek refuge from brutal, ruthless, and relentless lookism.

Now we can't get jobs, will be fired for asinine reasons, be mistreated in the workplace due to women, can't find social groups which exclude women so at least we can build friendships with those who have common interests without being ostracized for our looks, be discriminated in interviews no matter how well we speak due to majority of HR being staffed by women, can't enjoy travel and living due to couples getting special treatment and being treated like shit due to being perpetually single. Their goal is to push out on the streets and kill us off, this is female genocide against those with unattractive male faces.

Back in the olden days, we didn't need to struggle this hard, even with an unattractive face a job was guaranteed, if you showed up and worked they would keep you as long as possible, you could have friends who didn't care about looks because of the lack of women there was less sexual competition and lookism in groups, at the end of the day you could even get a looksmatched wife with a low body count who would be happy to have kids with you and nurture them for success. Everything was better 50-100 years ago if you had an unattractive male face you still had a shot at life. Nowadays, if you are sub4 or even sub5 it's over. And even plain average looking men have to struggle just to be accepted.

I often believe I would have made something of myself in that world and become a white-collar professional instead of a college drop-out and actually contributed significantly to society. Instead I am being forced to rot and slowly driven to suicide. I wonder how many potential inventors, discoverers, innovators and professionals had their hearts and spirits crushed simply because they were below average looking and ended up underachieving or even killing themselves. RIP to all of them all because of women who simply wouldn't allow them to survive and live their lives. Instead they bullied, ostracized, villainized and drove them to suicide.

 

[Sexless incel]

Read the first 3 sentences and agreed

 

[scortcel_esp]

High IQ post

 

[Stupid Clown]

When one group gains power they use it to oppress and destroy another group. It's human nature to punch down especially against those with unattractive faces, merely because of the deviled horns effect, which people, primarily women choose to judge someone's personality based on their facial attractiveness. With women free to be in the workplace and all social spaces, there's no place those with unattractive male faces can seek refuge from brutal, ruthless, and relentless lookism.

Now we can't get jobs, will be fired for asinine reasons, be mistreated in the workplace due to women, can't find social groups which exclude women so at least we can build friendships with those who have common interests without being ostracized for our looks, be discriminated in interviews no matter how well we speak due to majority of HR being staffed by women, can't enjoy travel and living due to couples getting special treatment and being treated like shit due to being perpetually single. Their goal is to push out on the streets and kill us off, this is female genocide against those with unattractive male faces.

Back in the olden days, we didn't need to struggle this hard, even with an unattractive face a job was guaranteed, if you showed up and worked they would keep you as long as possible, you could have friends who didn't care about looks because of the lack of women there was less sexual competition and lookism in groups, at the end of the day you could even get a looksmatched wife with a low body count who would be happy to have kids with you and nurture them for success. Everything was better 50-100 years ago if you had an unattractive male face you still had a shot at life. Nowadays, if you are sub4 or even sub5 it's over. And even plain average looking men have to struggle just to be accepted.

I often believe I would have made something of myself in that world and become a white-collar professional instead of a college drop-out and actually contributed significantly to society. Instead I am being forced to rot and slowly driven to suicide. I wonder how many potential inventors, discoverers, innovators and professionals had their hearts and spirits crushed simply because they were below average looking and ended up underachieving or even killing themselves. RIP to all of them all because of women who simply wouldn't allow them to survive and live their lives. Instead they bullied, ostracized, villainized and drove them to suicide.

I have done perfectly well in job interviews and I still get rejected. It's ridiculous. Honestly only good jobs are warehouse jobs.

 

[erenyeager]

I will destroy human nature. And replace with erenyeager nature

 

[universallyabhorred]

I have done perfectly well in job interviews and I still get rejected. It's ridiculous. Honestly only good jobs are warehouse jobs.

Our facial personalities aren't considered good enough for these jobs. An illiterate intellectually disabled HTN+ is seen as a better fit than us.

 

[Stupid Clown]

Our facial personalities aren't considered good enough for these jobs. An illiterate intellectually disabled HTN+ is seen as a better fit than usobs and anything involving women is a no that's what

Retail jobs and anything involving women is a no. That's why I do warehouse and physical jobs where women are too lazy to try.

 

[Stupid Clown]

Warehouse jobs are the worst. I would rather toil away with paper work.

Fair point. To each his own.

 

[TBIcel]

Monogamy is sexual socialism, seize the means of reproduction.

 

[blastard001]

My world turned upside down,when I read about various political movements around the world I was shocked to find that all of them were runned by CHADS and STACEYS.

 

[Paperman]

What I hate is that we are still expected to contribute to this society that gives us nothing in return.

 

[universallyabhorred]

@PLA1092

 

[Profligate]

Everything was just as fucked 100 years ago as it is today just to a lesser extent. If you want to talk about the good old days you have to go back to the time when women were merely a property of their fathers and later husbands.

 

[universallyabhorred]

Everything was just as fucked 100 years ago as it is today just to a lesser extent.

How so?

If you want to talk about the good old days you have to go back to the time when women were merely a property of their fathers and later husbands.

Cope, as long as women are in the household for the most part, we would have been fine.

 

[Profligate]

How so?

Cope, as long as women are in the household for the most part, we would have been fine.

You still had to jestermaxx to get a wife and then be a good house negro for her so that she doesn't leave you which is inherently cucked. Anything that isn't an arranged marriage is gynocracy

 

[Immolator]

High IQ post

 

[PLA1092]

You still had to jestermaxx to get a wife and then be a good house negro for her so that she doesn't leave you which is inherently cucked. Anything that isn't an arranged marriage is gynocracy

Foids couldn't just leave you back then, and standards were in fact lower; social media and the delusion that is feminism is what causes pretty much 0 attraction to sub 5 males, as it's not biological.

 

[universallyabhorred]

Foids couldn't just leave you back then, and standards were in fact lower; social media and the delusion that is feminism is what causes pretty much 0 attraction to sub 5 males, as it's not biological.

Do you think a 2 or 3/10 male could have found a woman back then who was attracted to him? Do you believe there's a minimum biological standard for facial aesthetics below which a woman would have still found a man repulsive? Would I be able to ascend back then with the way I look right now?

 

[Profligate]

Foids couldn't just leave you back then, and standards were in fact lower; social media and the delusion that is feminism is what causes pretty much 0 attraction to sub 5 males, as it's not biological.

Well they could if they really wanted to and yes standards were lower but that's besides the point.

 

[PLA1092]

Would I be able to ascend back then with the way I look right now?

Even the curries you mog probably could with arranged marriage, to be honest.

 

[PLA1092]

Well they could if they really wanted to and yes standards were lower but that's besides the point.

Yes, but there'd be much more controversy around it, and not as many white knights and cucks ready to accuse the sub 5 male in question of abuse simply for existing; standards being lower matter, as it means the bar for being at least acceptably attractive is lower.

 

[Profligate]

Yes, but there'd be much more controversy around it, and not as many white knights and cucks ready to accuse the sub 5 male in question of abuse simply for existing; standards being lower matter, as it means the bar for being at least acceptably attractive is lower.

I know I wasn't debating that. My whole point was that even at those times you still had to approach women and do the whole gynocentric mating ritual where you could end up getting brutally rejected instead of having your family provide you with a virgin wife as it should be.

 

[universallyabhorred]

Even the curries you mog probably could with arranged marriage, to be honest.

Even Sam Entertainment? Honestly I think he's the only curry I mog.

 

[Transcended Trucel]

Giga high IQ post. Millions of ugly men do the bare minimum because they don't have motivation to push further and literally can't make progress due to discrimination. It is over, it won't get better either, we must move on

 

[PLA1092]

Even Sam Entertainment? Honestly I think he's the only curry I mog.

You're not that subhuman.

 

[Izayacel]

When one group gains power they use it to oppress and destroy another group. It's human nature to punch down especially against those with unattractive faces, merely because of the deviled horns effect, which people, primarily women choose to judge someone's personality based on their facial attractiveness. With women free to be in the workplace and all social spaces, there's no place those with unattractive male faces can seek refuge from brutal, ruthless, and relentless lookism.

Now we can't get jobs, will be fired for asinine reasons, be mistreated in the workplace due to women, can't find social groups which exclude women so at least we can build friendships with those who have common interests without being ostracized for our looks, be discriminated in interviews no matter how well we speak due to majority of HR being staffed by women, can't enjoy travel and living due to couples getting special treatment and being treated like shit due to being perpetually single. Their goal is to push out on the streets and kill us off, this is female genocide against those with unattractive male faces.

Back in the olden days, we didn't need to struggle this hard, even with an unattractive face a job was guaranteed, if you showed up and worked they would keep you as long as possible, you could have friends who didn't care about looks because of the lack of women there was less sexual competition and lookism in groups, at the end of the day you could even get a looksmatched wife with a low body count who would be happy to have kids with you and nurture them for success. Everything was better 50-100 years ago if you had an unattractive male face you still had a shot at life. Nowadays, if you are sub4 or even sub5 it's over. And even plain average looking men have to struggle just to be accepted.

I often believe I would have made something of myself in that world and become a white-collar professional instead of a college drop-out and actually contributed significantly to society. Instead I am being forced to rot and slowly driven to suicide. I wonder how many potential inventors, discoverers, innovators and professionals had their hearts and spirits crushed simply because they were below average looking and ended up underachieving or even killing themselves. RIP to all of them all because of women who simply wouldn't allow them to survive and live their lives. Instead they bullied, ostracized, villainized and drove them to suicide.

This world Makes Sure that Woman are the winnERs "

Backwards fucking Clownery

 

[InMemoriam]

primarily women choose to judge someone's personality based on their facial attractiveness. With women free to be in the workplace and all social spaces, there's no place those with unattractive male faces can seek refuge from brutal, ruthless, and relentless lookism.

Now we can't get jobs, will be fired for asinine reasons, be mistreated in the workplace due to women, can't find social groups which exclude women so at least we can build friendships with those who have common interests without being ostracized for our looks, be discriminated in interviews no matter how well we speak due to majority of HR being staffed by women, can't enjoy travel and living due to couples getting special treatment and being treated like shit due to being perpetually single. Their goal is to push out on the streets and kill us off, this is female genocide against those with unattractive male faces.

lookist subjugation of ugly men were hardly factored in occupational success before the postfeminist takeover; things like aesthetic labor would not exist today if it wasn't for feminisation, beautification and sexualization of the workforce. a clear exploitation of gendered lookism.

 

[LL maxi]

And what is the cause of women's rights? Industrialization and democracy

 

[universallyabhorred]

And what is the cause of women's rights? Industrialization and democracy

It's feminism.

 

[LL maxi]

It's feminism.

thats just another name for it, industrialization rendered men's physical prowess obsolete, created white collar jobs which women are also able to do. therefore freeing women from houses and putting them into workforce became profitable. same goes with democracy, women being much easier to program and half the population, giving them voting rights will dramatically change the result of an election. the combination effort along with other field in which making women playing a larger role is feminism.

 

[based_meme]

thats just another name for it, industrialization rendered men's physical prowess obsolete, created white collar jobs which women are also able to do. therefore freeing women from houses and putting them into workforce became profitable. same goes with democracy, women being much easier to program and half the population, giving them voting rights will dramatically change the result of an election. the combination effort along with other field in which making women playing a larger role is feminism.

I think it's more accurate to say that industrialization paved the way for feminism to flourish, but we're splitting hairs at this point. Unfortunately, it's natural to expect that technological progress will promote more egalitarianism in the workforce, because market forces will dictate the need for women to work in some capacity in some industries and sectors.

 

[Kafka2020]

I think it's more accurate to say that industrialization paved the way for feminism to flourish, but we're splitting hairs at this point. Unfortunately, it's natural to expect that technological progress will promote more egalitarianism in the workforce, because market forces will dictate the need for women to work in some capacity in some industries and sectors.

Sure, but even then, the issue is not them working per se, it's that they can use the tools of universal suffrage-based democracy to gain all the benefits of individual labor with none of the costs.

Women should not receive any special benefit anywhere, from the government to the workplace. We give them this, either by voting for it or, blue pill boomers in the hiring/education process have created, what I like to call, the vagina price floor.

I've seen women with undergrad degrees in English, get jobs in programming with the justification that they "can learn on the job" or "they have a diverse skill set" yet men, they need graduate degrees in STEM to even be considered for that job. Why? What benefit did we gain from this? Equality? You just disenfranchised some random men, how is that equality?

This aberration is going to inflate the value of women's income, they may not even do the work, but we insulate women from the opportunity cost required to get there. There is no way that an English major and a Computer Science major are even comparable. That whore making 90k a year will not date down. Any woman that has a corporate job that was born after 1950, was GIVEN that job, she didn't earn shit.

That isn't a market force, that is inefficiency, created by government intervention, completely justified by the Normie populace who are either too stupid or don't care that this will cuck them even more. Feminism is just communism based on gender rather than social class, and it only exists because we have quasi-socialist economies where productive people subsidize unproductive people.

Funnily enough, 100 years of feminism, and yet, all most women can amount to, is sex work. They are the losers of society; I don't care what any faggot media personality tells me. Imagine having every western economy kissing your ass, throwing money at you, and literally castrating men and there is still a wage gap when we looked at hours worked vs field of work.

Women are communists, and we should have told them to fuck off.

 

[Kafka2020]

When one group gains power they use it to oppress and destroy another group. It's human nature to punch down especially against those with unattractive faces, merely because of the deviled horns effect, which people, primarily women choose to judge someone's personality based on their facial attractiveness. With women free to be in the workplace and all social spaces, there's no place those with unattractive male faces can seek refuge from brutal, ruthless, and relentless lookism.

Now we can't get jobs, will be fired for asinine reasons, be mistreated in the workplace due to women, can't find social groups which exclude women so at least we can build friendships with those who have common interests without being ostracized for our looks, be discriminated in interviews no matter how well we speak due to majority of HR being staffed by women, can't enjoy travel and living due to couples getting special treatment and being treated like shit due to being perpetually single. Their goal is to push out on the streets and kill us off, this is female genocide against those with unattractive male faces.

Back in the olden days, we didn't need to struggle this hard, even with an unattractive face a job was guaranteed, if you showed up and worked they would keep you as long as possible, you could have friends who didn't care about looks because of the lack of women there was less sexual competition and lookism in groups, at the end of the day you could even get a looksmatched wife with a low body count who would be happy to have kids with you and nurture them for success. Everything was better 50-100 years ago if you had an unattractive male face you still had a shot at life. Nowadays, if you are sub4 or even sub5 it's over. And even plain average looking men have to struggle just to be accepted.

I often believe I would have made something of myself in that world and become a white-collar professional instead of a college drop-out and actually contributed significantly to society. Instead I am being forced to rot and slowly driven to suicide. I wonder how many potential inventors, discoverers, innovators and professionals had their hearts and spirits crushed simply because they were below average looking and ended up underachieving or even killing themselves. RIP to all of them all because of women who simply wouldn't allow them to survive and live their lives. Instead they bullied, ostracized, villainized and drove them to suicide.

As a sub-five guy, that busted my ass to get into the white-collar STEM field, all the money you could make, means nothing when there is nothing else in your life.

I'm literally going to hermitmax for the next 30 years because even with a six-figure income, I have no life.

 

[Incedel]

Retail jobs and anything involving women is a no. That's why I do warehouse and physical jobs where women are too lazy to try.

Truthpill, every foid that works in my factory gets filtered out pretty quickly, especially the graveyard shift, sometimes there's not a foid in sight and its pure heaven

 

[based_meme]

Sure, but even then, the issue is not them working per se, it's that they can use the tools of universal suffrage-based democracy to gain all the benefits of individual labor with none of the costs.

Women should not receive any special benefit anywhere, from the government to the workplace. We give them this, either by voting for it or, blue pill boomers in the hiring/education process have created, what I like to call, the vagina price floor.

I've seen women with undergrad degrees in English, get jobs in programming with the justification that they "can learn on the job" or "they have a diverse skill set" yet men, they need graduate degrees in STEM to even be considered for that job. Why? What benefit did we gain from this? Equality? You just disenfranchised some random men, how is that equality?

This aberration is going to inflate the value of women's income, they may not even do the work, but we insulate women from the opportunity cost required to get there. There is no way that an English major and a Computer Science major are even comparable. That whore making 90k a year will not date down. Any woman that has a corporate job that was born after 1950, was GIVEN that job, she didn't earn shit.

That isn't a market force, that is inefficiency, created by government intervention, completely justified by the Normie populace who are either too stupid or don't care that this will cuck them even more. Feminism is just communism based on gender rather than social class, and it only exists because we have quasi-socialist economies where productive people subsidize unproductive people.

Funnily enough, 100 years of feminism, and yet, all most women can amount to, is sex work. They are the losers of society; I don't care what any faggot media personality tells me. Imagine having every western economy kissing your ass, throwing money at you, and literally castrating men and there is still a wage gap when we looked at hours worked vs field of work.

Women are communists, and we should have told them to fuck off.

High IQ breakdown.

Sadly, you are 100% on the mark, with pinpoint accuracy.

Are there any examples of post-industrial societies with up to date technology that haven't experienced the inefficiencies you've highlighted, due to institutional feminism and its resultant communist ideological influences, that we know of? The only country that comes to mind is Japan, but I think that might be wrong. From what I understand, they too have been experiencing strong, heavy-handed feminist influences, mostly in part due to their national and cultural, post WW2 relationship with the US.

@Simulacrasimulation Thoughts?

 

[Soulflayer]

You still had to jestermaxx to get a wife and then be a good house negro for her so that she doesn't leave you which is inherently cucked. Anything that isn't an arranged marriage is gynocracy

Arranged marriage is cucked

 

[Simulacrasimulation]

High IQ breakdown.

Sadly, you are 100% on the mark, with pinpoint accuracy.

Are there any examples of post-industrial societies with up to date technology that haven't experienced the inefficiencies you've highlighted, due to institutional feminism and its resultant communist ideological influences, that we know of? The only country that comes to mind is Japan, but I think that might be wrong. From what I understand, they too have been experiencing strong, heavy-handed feminist influences, mostly in part due to their national and cultural, post WW2 relationship with the US.

@Simulacrasimulation Thoughts?

it seems feminism has this copy and paste approach, whereby every country that has seen success in feminising industry, education, law and politics merely copy and pastes nearly every single tactic (most in particular using the model of western feminism), ENVELOPING EVERY AREA AND INFECTING IT WITH FEMINISM.

Affirmative action, broad rights for muh women, extreme leverage in the courts system towards women, quotas, pushing women into education and tailoring the experience to women over men, all of these are merely copied and pasted into the next 2nd world or even third world country, we are now seeing india, even the middle eastern countries are suffering this.

What i dont get is that now we see its not working (twitter), where these women are pushed into roles in a forced fake way, and they cant do it because they arent qualified and have no technical skills, twitter FIRED 50% OF ITS STAFF AND IS WORKING AT LEAST AS WELL AS IT WAS BEFORE, THIS IS HUGE MAKE NO MISTAKE, A LOT OF COMPANIES WILL BE LOOKING VERY CLOSELY AT THEIR STAFF ESPECIALLY TECH COMPANIES. You sw the before and after of the office shots, every becky and high tier woman has been eliminated, there were only techy men in the shot, who by inference are way more likely to be programmes than becky mcbecky.


I just cant see why these third world countries would follow a path if it is showing itself to be a failure over time, if more and more companies prune these quotas and more women are laid off, how can they not see it is a failed approach. Business doesnt give a shit about anything other than money, growth and expansion ANYTHING THAT STOPS THIS IS ELIMINATED, WHY WOULDNT THIS BRAINDEAD DUMBASS HIRING OF PEOPLE (EG WOMEN AND LGBTQYWEUIWERIOJ ETHNIC DIVERSITY ETC) WHO ARE NOT QUALIFIED JUST BASED ON MINORITY STATUS BE ELIMINATED IN THE SAME WAY.

 

[Kafka2020]

High IQ breakdown.

Sadly, you are 100% on the mark, with pinpoint accuracy.

Are there any examples of post-industrial societies with up to date technology that haven't experienced the inefficiencies you've highlighted, due to institutional feminism and its resultant communist ideological influences, that we know of? The only country that comes to mind is Japan, but I think that might be wrong. From what I understand, they too have been experiencing strong, heavy-handed feminist influences, mostly in part due to their national and cultural, post WW2 relationship with the US.

@Simulacrasimulation Thoughts?

Japan has a DEBT to GDP of 262%: https://tradingeconomics.com/japan/government-debt-to-gdp

Literally destroyed their standard of living and their economy and have done nothing but pushed more gender bullshit:

“Womenomics” in Japan

Womenomics Womenomics is a policy based on the idea that Japan can boost its economy by getting more women into the workforce, and they are rewarded with

asiapacificcurriculum.ca

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/01/japan-global-birth-rate-decline/

it seems feminism has this copy and paste approach, whereby every country that has seen success in feminising industry, education, law and politics merely copy and pastes nearly every single tactic (most in particular using the model of western feminism), ENVELOPING EVERY AREA AND INFECTING IT WITH FEMINISM.

Affirmative action, broad rights for muh women, extreme leverage in the courts system towards women, quotas, pushing women into education and tailoring the experience to women over men, all of these are merely copied and pasted into the next 2nd world or even third world country, we are now seeing india, even the middle eastern countries are suffering this.

What i dont get is that now we see its not working (twitter), where these women are pushed into roles in a forced fake way, and they cant do it because they arent qualified and have no technical skills, twitter FIRED 50% OF ITS STAFF AND IS WORKING AT LEAST AS WELL AS IT WAS BEFORE, THIS IS HUGE MAKE NO MISTAKE, A LOT OF COMPANIES WILL BE LOOKING VERY CLOSELY AT THEIR STAFF ESPECIALLY TECH COMPANIES. You sw the before and after of the office shots, every becky and high tier woman has been eliminated, there were only techy men in the shot, who by inference are way more likely to be programmes than becky mcbecky.


I just cant see why these third world countries would follow a path if it is showing itself to be a failure over time, if more and more companies prune these quotas and more women are laid off, how can they not see it is a failed approach. Business doesnt give a shit about anything other than money, growth and expansion ANYTHING THAT STOPS THIS IS ELIMINATED, WHY WOULDNT THIS BRAINDEAD DUMBASS HIRING OF PEOPLE (EG WOMEN AND LGBTQYWEUIWERIOJ ETHNIC DIVERSITY ETC) WHO ARE NOT QUALIFIED JUST BASED ON MINORITY STATUS BE ELIMINATED IN THE SAME WAY.

Communism will work this time, we swear /s.

Idealogues are mentally ill and are a danger to humanity.