Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Toxic Femininity Women Found To Value Social Justice & Emotions Over Academics

DarkStar

DarkStar

Luminary
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 20, 2022
Posts
11,583

Both quite an intriguing -yet also concerning- read which is ofc quite blackpilled. As i've always said to you guys, it's quite kafkaesque as to how we have literal scientific data confirming what our convergence of evidence has already effectively proven many times, yet somehow we are gaslight by many normies who also shill for "science" when it suites them- like with gender being something you can "choose" :feelsugh:

Ofc, we're all familiar with the general caricature of some super woke, radically liberal foid with dyed hair, glasses, and is also an incels looksmatch advocating for outlandish things, such as claiming gender is "fluid," race is not real, or the hilarious claim that ":foidSoy:: Wahmen are oppressed!1!1!" And while this general prototype ofc is valid, it will be interesting to see how foids who score low on the Left index are:feelsthink:

The study primarily focused upon that of Gen-Z, which is to be expected, but what I found interesting was this:
448 Generation Z (i.e., born from 1995 onward) students completed the survey: 129 men (29%), 302 women (68%), and 12 who chose not to identify (Mage = 20.32).
Now i'm sure we have heard as to how there's more foids than men in higher education nowadays, and while I do admit it has been awhile sine i've seen a stat on this, I did not expect it to have this degree of discrepancy. :whatfeels::shock:

Seeing stats such as this while also hearing from both sides as to how ":soy::feels::foidSoy:: Men need to pull themselves up!" is such ragefuel

So now let's look a the breakdown:
Image3SD

As we can see, foids noticeably value the concepts of Social Justice & Emotional Wellbeing noticeably more than that of academics, advancing knowledge, and most concerning, that of academic freedom.

This also shows more insight:
Gpj4YUrXcAAb1X

Ofc, the more left leaning it goes, the more they value social justice in general. However, for foids, it seems those who are more radically left, the value of well being does somewhat decline in favor of valuing "advancing knowledge" though ofc we can all do the math. :feelsjuice:

And honestly, rare W for soy "leftwingcels" since they all valued freedom & above all advancing knowledge noticeably more than foids. Will say it again, foids are the perfect zogbots:blackpill:

It is also quite interesting how they break this down in the discussion:
Gender demographics on college campuses have been reversed over the past sixty years (Duffin, 2020; Goldin, Katz, & Kuziemko, 2006). Males dominated college campuses in the 1960s with a ratio of 1.6 male to 1 female undergraduate students, inverting, as of2003, to become a ratio of 1.3 women to every 1 male undergraduate (Goldin, Katz, & Kuziemko, 2006). The change in gender demographics within colleges is significant, as gender has been linked to differences in personality traits, value orientation, and conservatism (Eagly, Diekman, & Koenig, 2004; Chaturvedi, 2016). For example, men tend to be less liberal than women (Eagly, Diekman, & Koenig, 2004; Chaturvedi, 2016), men score lower on agreeableness and openness (Schmitt et al., 2008; Schmitt et al., 2016), and men have higher scores on emotional stability (Schmitt et al., 2008; Schmitt et al., 2016).
Quite interesting, yet also a concern ofc.

We literally are in Kali Yuga, those who have power shouldn't.
In this study, it was found, (1) higher agreeableness was positively correlated with higher ratings towards social justice and emotional well-being, but lower ratings towards advancing knowledge and academic rigor. This research also showed (2) lower emotional stability was linked with higher scores on emotional well-being and social justice, while lower scores on advancing knowledge and academic rigor. In addition, the research reveals (3) that lower scores on conservatism predicted lower scores on academic rigor, but higher scores on social justice. These findings are significant as the factors which predict valuing social justice and emotional well-being are all intimately associated with gender.
In other words, the more normie you are, the more of an SJW you are- who knew?:feelsjuice:

@based_meme @weaselbomber @WorthlessSlavicShit @veryrare @Solid @GeckoBus @AtrociousCitizen @Koomersarj @wereq @Diddy @Flagellum_Dei @Sergeant Kelly @Paladin @Grodd @SuperKanga.Belgrade @reveries @PersonalityChad @Stupid Clown @Antorian @glutty @Oneitiscel @Cybersex is our hope @KING VON @NeverGetUp @Regenerator @Diddy @Old Ironsides @daydreamER
 
Mind boggling how normies won't accept what we have been saying for years even in the face of academic evidence. Interestingly this proves exactly the conclusion of this paper: they value emotions and social justice more than academics. No amount of evidence will make them see the truth because their emotions override it and they simply say "I don't see it that way.". But the evidence, the evidence sees it that way!
 
Not surprising at all many foids are woke fucking whores especially when it comes to virtue signalling about welcoming rapefugees which ultimately is ruining countries.

This goes for alot of normies in general too :feelsseriously:
 
No surprise. Women are gullible. Women also benefit from college more than men. As a man you're unlikely to get a decent job after graduating college. As a woman it's guaranteed
 
Great post boyo. It always intrigue my how many of Weininger's theses are proven by blackpillists. Foids indeed cannot think; they react automatically, like automatas.
 
Of course things like this can be intuitively deduced just by observing retarded leftards but its good to have some data actually proving this stuff. Doesn't surprise me at all that advancing knowledge isn't high on the list of what leftists want anyway, since they hate the truth.
 
No surprise, but it just goes to show how allowing these creatures into higher education and politics was a GRAVE mistake that will inevitably lead to the decay and destruction of society.

At colleg, foids are the majority, even to the class I went.
 
No surprise. This kind of content you post remind me of blkpillpres

But their entire goal is to encourage the higher education to become left wing feminists. You can see it through toilets who try to influence proctoring..
 
They're the NPC gender

True, but now that women have agency and can make independent decisions it definitely is
men let go of the leash and are now surprised they're running wild.
shocked Pikachu - Wiktionary, the free ...
 
Women are children, it has always been evident, and men are the ones who create and maintain civilisation, which is also not a secret. If you give power to the former instead of the latter you'll create chaos. Why is it so hard to understand for people.
 
Keep in mind that what is meant by "social justice emotions, empathy" is women's self interest over those of men's and more broadly over absolute truth mixed in with feeling good about themselves so it's misandry, solipsism and narcissism as usual - women's trinity.

Otherwise feminized spaces including academia wouldn't be arbitrary and detrimental to men by definition so it's all bullshit : here in France female judges are still pushing for quotas in their domain despite being already over represented (71% of judges are women).

Women are children
Ontologically they literally are no matter what they do, they might aswell be succesful and have an IQ of 150 but once you saw it you can't unsee it and it's so humiliating for men to be put beneath such people - villainized and ostracized if you criticize them and only finding solace by tacitly submitting to the duplicitous hurt they inflict on men at every turn.

It's difficult to live with the perfectly justified ressentment i feel towards them and society.

Stats like these again show how much different the sexes are and yet we're only allowed to think in a gender neutral frame.
 
Last edited:
So basically, college is full of women, and none of them care about science/knowledge/truth ?
Lmao
 
Keep in mind that what is meant by "social justice emotions, empathy" is women's self interest over those of men's and more broadly over absolute truth mixed in with feeling good about themselves so it's misandry, solipsism and narcissism as usual - women's trinity.
Of course. Foids can murder millions of babies a year, but as long as you frame it as a greater good (or some social justice) in this gyno-fascist society, it's all fine. Literal genocide level killing is fine.
Otherwise feminized spaces including academia wouldn't be arbitrary and detrimental to men by definition so it's all bullshit : here in France female judges are still pushing for quotas in their domain despite being already over represented (71% of judges are women).
I saw it from a mile way when I was a little kid, something about foids working in office-based environments didn't sit right with me. Maybe men evolved to have that visceral reaction. I'd argue, your average and employed foid has far more power than millionaire richcels in today's world.
Ontologically they literally are no matter what they do, they might aswell be succesful and have an IQ of 150 but once you saw it you can't unsee it and it's so humiliating for men to be put beneath such people - villainized and ostracized if you criticize them and only finding solace by tacitly submitting to the duplicitous hurt they inflict on men at every turn.
IQ is an absolutely useless measurement in this advanced world. Foids with higher IQs are more dangerous to men, and in essence their existence is destructive to the well-being of society. I read a comment a few months ago where someone said something like, "intelligent strippers are the most evil."
It's difficult to live with the perfectly justified ressentment i feel towards them and society.
We are not required to justify our resentment towards. They are the nobility who have made men's existence a living hell. I'd argue they are even more powerful than any nobilities as they can parade around amongst us and freely insult our existence without any repercussions.

Ultimately, it's the weak men who are enabling this. I genuinely think 99.99% are weak when it comes to foids. Because even if they're red or blackpilled, almost all of them still vouch for some return of 'tradition' or enforced monogamy, not realizing foids would manipulate and repeat the same cycle within just two generations. And that only proves most men don't care about the society, it's future, and the future generations' men. They just want to get their dicks wet at the end of the day. It's just not viable for both the genders to co-exist in this 'advanced' world.
Stats like these again show how much different the sexes are and yet we're only allowed to think in a gender neutral frame.
Why I have more respect for loony leftards and radfems than sewer rat centrists, the so-called good foids, or even elder "trad" foids. I got in an argument with a user here where he stated grandmas are the only foids who care about men, grandsons. I retorted if they really cared about their grandsons they would right now be out on the streets protesting against this gyno-fascism instead of making homemade pickles for their grandson who are leading a zombie existence. Besides these grandmas are the reasons why the family court is how it is now. They should be termed 'evil opportunists.'
 
Last edited:
(((Academics))) are just libcuck Hitlerjugend but for adults.
 
Of course. Foids can murder millions of babies a year, but as long as you frame it as a greater good (or some social justice) in this gyno-fascist society, it's all fine. Literal genocide level killing is fine.
Exactly what i meant, social justice and emotional wellbeing from women's perspective just means female self-interest in the end, not some innate love for the greater good as all their anterior actions prove it.

But i might add that it's also - maybe more subconsciously and innately - about the ongoing subversion of society by making it increasingly horizontal (duplicitous/ambivalent/chaotic/fluid - feminine) instead of vertical (straigthforward/moral/ordered/rigid - masculine).

You can see this dichotomy in every society that symbolically kills the father whether ideologically or as a byproduct of modernization : what used to be solid relationships became unstable under the impulse of women as shown in divorce stats, therefore the family model changed from rigid to fluid.

This even pertains to things like feminine attire : under a truly man ruled society women dress modestly cause of the intrinsic sexual aspect of their bodies and it's sheer impact regardless of the intention, while under a feminine society like today foids reign free so will use euphemisms like "i look cute in this outfit" with their whole ass on display, it's so obscene and grotesque but, again, we moved from a straightforward model to a duplicitous one - from vertical to horizontal - which is exactly what is shown in those stats : men are for "academic rigor" or solid principles like free speech - the concrete - while women go for stuff like muh emotions or social justice which are catchall terms rooted in the abstract.

That's why egalitarism is a myth because the sexes are deeply different, gender neutrality is a disease : when a woman enters an institution she's going to feminize it whether she likes it or not and therefore be detrimental to men, and when she sexualizes herself she colonizes the public space and subtly drain men from their dignity, again, whether she likes it or not.
I saw it from a mile way when I was a little kid, something about foids working in office-based environments didn't sit right with me. Maybe men evolved to have that visceral reaction.
It's a natural feeling i.e what i just talked about, a gut feeling men suppress under social engineering and complete abdication in front of the evidence.
IQ is an absolutely useless measurement in this advanced world. Foids with higher IQs are more dangerous to men, and in essence their existence is destructive to the well-being of society. I read a comment a few months ago where someone said something like, "intelligent strippers are the most evil."
It cant be any different, we're told to "celebrate women's achievements" when they obviously use every single achievement against men as visible with the "invented by women stolen by men" horrible propaganda. It really leaves lucid men no choice.
We are not required to justify our resentment towards. They are the nobility who have made men's existence a living hell. I'd argue they are even more powerful than any nobilities as they can parade around amongst us and freely insult our existence without any repercussions.

Ultimately, it's the weak men who are enabling this. I genuinely think 99.99% are weak when it comes to foids. Because even if they're red or blackpilled, almost all of them still vouch for some return of 'tradition' or enforced monogamy, not realizing foids would manipulate and repeat the same cycle within just two generations. And that only proves most men don't care about the society, it's future, and the future generations' men. They just want to get their dicks wet at the end of the day. It's just not viable for both the genders to co-exist in this 'advanced' world.
Idk, i just feel like the traditional model in order to work for men can't be half arsed that's all, i dont think that there's another bilateral solution so i'm not surprised you mentionned complete separation.
Why I have more respect for loony leftards and radfems than sewer rat centrists, the so-called good foids, or even elder "trad" foids. I got in an argument with a user here where he stated grandmas are the only foids who care about men, grandsons. I retorted if they really cared about their grandsons they would right now be out on the streets protesting against this gyno-fascism instead of making homemade pickles for their grandson who are leading a zombie existence. Besides these grandmas are the reasons why the family court is how it is now. They should be termed 'evil opportunists.'
Yeah i'm really perplexed about the "good woman" trope too. It's all about the structure of society.
 
Idk, i just feel like the traditional model in order to work for men can't be half arsed that's all, i dont think that there's another bilateral solution so i'm not surprised you mentionned complete separation.
My point is you can have a rigid society with enforced monogamy, but in their personal lives men would continue to get manipulated. State cannot oversee those developments. That's why I'm radically in favor of gender separation. Just uproot the cancer once and for all.
 
Reminds me of argument that CityCrusher sometimes makes that basically there is no "woke"-ism in gaming/employment etc. but rather it's all just women shitting all over men/dominating society.
 
1 oxygen atom + 2 hydrogen atoms
 

Similar threads

DarkStar
Replies
32
Views
1K
superpsycho
superpsycho
Balding Subhuman
Replies
2
Views
384
AvoidantCoper
AvoidantCoper
Numetalist
Replies
20
Views
2K
Numetalist
Numetalist
DarkStar
Replies
9
Views
915
404BrainNotFound
404BrainNotFound
DarkStar
Replies
55
Views
3K
WiZardTheGrAY
WiZardTheGrAY

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Suigin Trismegistus
  • Samkakum
shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top