They want validation based on the value the person has in the hierarchies of mankind.
His unchangeable/ nonmalleable traits are what she determines that through.
Becuase she is esteeming him from the biological hierarchy/ filiational hierarchy (his family/ ancestors... ancestrarchy because he must have been a bad ass in the past for his family to hoard genes good enough for him to look astounding today)/ criticalitarchy (because the criticality of human beings will constantly pick, and pry for anything of low value. And often times people with artificial value are covering up their own inferiority. Women want men who are esteemed based on the birthbuiltarchy because if your value/ distinctions are birth-built... then they're things your opposition, when they are inferior to you... simply cannot alter in a way that can't be criticized.
Women love men to be in the criticalitarchal position of superiority. To literally, in the deepest thicket of a judgment/ judgment thicket... able to stand strong.
The criticalitarchy is the thing we, as primal beings, esteem hotness/ power/ dominance from.
Based on all the people we know would be underlyingly impressed.
It's why they are trying to go for guys (based on primal nature) who are dominant, sociopathic, powerful. Even when they have a degree of cold aloofness. Which would not represent friends.
YOU DO NOT CARE FOR FRIENDSHIP IF YOU ARE TRYING TO GET WITH PEOPLE WHO ARE UNFRIENDLY. They are going for somehting else. Friendship is never wanted in a vacuum. Especially by primal humanity who want their own dominance more prominent in social circles/ communication than friendliness.
Women do want validation and identififcation as psychopaths (tacitly/ underlyingly) want to do it for status though. For impressionarchy value. Because the criticality value is more important than genuineness sometimes.
Which is why women do safe-psycho stuff but they're never going to be serial killers really.
But they want to be powerful in judgment thickets/ circles. It's all style, glamor, larp, manipulation, notions for them.
They want to smite their critics, and advance their ego more than be psychopaths, but they want psychopathy in their identity so that people can respect their ego from more angles.
Women get no validation they want from incels.
Because a woman wants to have the underlying social substance of the perpetual primarchy. Where they will be esteemed from primal standards, where everyone is looking for them through their ancestors/ genetics/ nonmalleables/ etc. to create an irrevocably high impression and implication that they are a high human being that produces all the things that get even the most snooty/ reserved people out of their chairs to talk to them.
His unchangeable/ nonmalleable traits are what she determines that through.
Becuase she is esteeming him from the biological hierarchy/ filiational hierarchy (his family/ ancestors... ancestrarchy because he must have been a bad ass in the past for his family to hoard genes good enough for him to look astounding today)/ criticalitarchy (because the criticality of human beings will constantly pick, and pry for anything of low value. And often times people with artificial value are covering up their own inferiority. Women want men who are esteemed based on the birthbuiltarchy because if your value/ distinctions are birth-built... then they're things your opposition, when they are inferior to you... simply cannot alter in a way that can't be criticized.
Women love men to be in the criticalitarchal position of superiority. To literally, in the deepest thicket of a judgment/ judgment thicket... able to stand strong.
The criticalitarchy is the thing we, as primal beings, esteem hotness/ power/ dominance from.
Based on all the people we know would be underlyingly impressed.
It's why they are trying to go for guys (based on primal nature) who are dominant, sociopathic, powerful. Even when they have a degree of cold aloofness. Which would not represent friends.
YOU DO NOT CARE FOR FRIENDSHIP IF YOU ARE TRYING TO GET WITH PEOPLE WHO ARE UNFRIENDLY. They are going for somehting else. Friendship is never wanted in a vacuum. Especially by primal humanity who want their own dominance more prominent in social circles/ communication than friendliness.
Women do want validation and identififcation as psychopaths (tacitly/ underlyingly) want to do it for status though. For impressionarchy value. Because the criticality value is more important than genuineness sometimes.
Which is why women do safe-psycho stuff but they're never going to be serial killers really.
But they want to be powerful in judgment thickets/ circles. It's all style, glamor, larp, manipulation, notions for them.
They want to smite their critics, and advance their ego more than be psychopaths, but they want psychopathy in their identity so that people can respect their ego from more angles.
Women get no validation they want from incels.
Because a woman wants to have the underlying social substance of the perpetual primarchy. Where they will be esteemed from primal standards, where everyone is looking for them through their ancestors/ genetics/ nonmalleables/ etc. to create an irrevocably high impression and implication that they are a high human being that produces all the things that get even the most snooty/ reserved people out of their chairs to talk to them.
