It's not cope, it's evolution. You still haven't wiped out this part of the blue pill from your mind (probably residue from kike brainwashing with Hollywood and Disney). You'll get there.
Human females view males strictly through a utilitarian lens. They only "love" a man as long as he provides something of value to her - sperm, resources, protection, child-rearing, comforts etc. She will fill in the missing gaps with other men where necessary, if one man can't fulfill all of her needs. The moment a male fails to fulfill the need she kept him around for, she will ruthlessly discard him and move on like he never existed. You can see this all of the time when normies talk about how "she's like a completely different person" after she divorces him and bleeds him dry. No, nigger, you just got fooled until you were no longer useful to her.
Psychologists will gaslight you (either from ignorance or from malice) and say that women "emotionally move on" quicker because they started doing so much longer than the men and have already taken the time to process their emotions. The reality is that they never had those emotions. She'll cheat on a man and not feel an iota of guilt, because (in her mind) it's his fault for not being the man to fulfill her needs. When she leaves him it'll look like she doesn't love him anymore, but she never did.
Having said all of this, they do feel something, but it's not "love" (romance is a male ideal). What they feel is the evolutionary analogue of the feeling of winning. What you see as "love" from the outside is the sensation of their pinnacle of victory as a human female - that being the feeling of securing the DNA and security (physical, financial, provisional, or some combination thereof) of a top-tier male that she can't realistically do better than, given her circumstances and lot in life (DNA, social station etc.).
