Blackpill Women can sense when a guy knows how to talk to a girl. And hate it to the point of rejection. PUA = Failo, or being NT as a skill = Failo.

[Pinpoint]

When a girl gives false signals and a guy knows how to charm his way out of it it makes her angry. Much like if we are being entertained by a girl who we don't wanna get with it feels like manipulation.
It adds anger to a girl for her intellect being insulted in addition to the initial offense of her desires/ wants being taken for nothing when the guy approached in the first place.

Being tactful is not a distinguishment women want.
In fact with the sjw/ humanitarian rules set in place to let women say "fuck off" even if you're not doing anything wrong, then it's almost EXplicit that if you're ugly... "know your role, there's nothing you can do about it".


NT has a limit of what it can do for you. And if you attempt to use it to gain higher access to sex than what your genetic budget permits you to get easily, then a girl gets offended and angry if you try to use your social intuition to get something opposed to what you can get fluidly.
Thug game is different, and has more to do with money, status, and ability, and practical power.

But in this day and age adornment (looks) matter more than practical power. Only girls who have a brain wired for practical power over adornment (NOTCOMMON in this day and age) will value thugmaxxing.

We live in the display-case age, not practicality unless you are poor and come from the hood or something underclass.
Either you pass the snap-reaction test for girls to like you (and this day and age that accounts for a huge portion of why girls like you, since that has to do with looks, demeanor, wealth, etc) or you are already so inferior to her that the idea a guy can get with a girl shows flaws on her part and makes her angry.
Even digging for personality shortly after accounting for your looks is rare in whether or not that will make or break you with a girl's criteria of worthiness. But the fact that needs to be done shows you're already beneath an 8/10 so it isn't a primal prospect.

 

[Pinpoint]

Just like how people decide to buy real estate. Through instinct within a few seconds, not careful thinking. Sure, they run the pros and cons after viewing the house, but that shit is supplemental to the subconscious decision that was already made in the first few seconds.

Link: https://activerain.com/blogsview/32...seconds-whether-they-are-interested-in-a-home


Another important thing to note here is that attention spans have been falling with the rise of visual centric internet media. People increasingly want things quickly and easily without having to "sift through the sand" so to speak. Instant gratification! This makes displaying one's personality/character/integrity/intellect based accomplishments even harder.

Of course that's why tinder is a thing that people enjoy more than having social circles these days.
Boomers and their boomerisms which say "getting a life" gets you friends. I've seen chad people play world of warcraft and get their dick sucked by a stacy while they're raiding without even stepping out of the house for a month.
The distinguishment that's key isn't being as you said... something supplementary (like having a good box with the cake), but being the ESSENTIAL (a good and tasty cake) which constitutes looks, adornment, unchangeable traits that subcommunicate high status/ standing/ etc. (the most wallraisedon touchstones of value because they're so unchangeable).
PUA has some good tips to get laid but if the initial jump isn't there form a girl then you can't hope to be more than a good establishable friend to them. There needs to be the zapttraction.

 

[Angryloserethnic30]

Being tactful is not a distinguishment women want.
In fact with the sjw/ humanitarian rules set in place to let women say "fuck off" even if you're not doing anything wrong, then it's almost EXplicit that if you're ugly... "know your role, there's nothing you can do about it".

Tesla Based I.Q., to put it in simple terms, if you don't pass her min looks threshold, your better dead than buried, she will end the convo quickly and make it known to that she doesn't want anything to do with you, if you keep on resisting her rejections then it will add fire to the fuel.

 

[Pinpoint]

Yes inherent displayable traits > epigenetic/learned traits,

This is a game where looks determine your lineage/ the long standing implication of your looks making you a winner in life. Linealarchy/ libervulgarchy (above vulgarity and mundanity). And those with higher looks have the greater implication of your DNA/ winningstreak (from past lineage) dominates.
The less of a pathetic wretch people can predict you were from your past/ your previous identity the better.
It is a game of what creates the greater reflection of value. If value does reflect less distinguishably then it is game over.
Being powerful is second to being what is projected to be rare, distinguished, or divine. But that hardly has any real concrete power. Human beings are not like dogs who breed for the biggest or fastest. It's whoever is perceived as the most immaculate which assigns the value to that person. I.E. who-ever would make the best role of a bad ass in a movie.
Everyone is fulfilling their fantasies of wanting to be with/ embody bad ass people.
Society's values can be reflected based on who is popular, or who people want to preciously hold onto. NOT who is the best cast in movies (as liberal sjwism panders movies to the common/ weak/ humanitarianism) Right now, whites definitely becoming more short supply BECAUSE of their own unique/ and ethereal traits of wanting to die (for humanitarianism) or just because their women have WAY TOO HIGH STANDARDS. It makes them seem ethereal to have these vibes where they are a high currency, and yet live in the bluepill about all of it and can still make by. They are remarkable on an individual level but dying as well.

Even if whites weren't worldclass dominators as told by history (anti-white demonizing propaganda of being holochausters and rapists of nations makes whites more attractive to women) then they would still be eerily more interesting and valuable because of physioimplication halo from blue eyes/ angular features.

Women mold themselves to see people in the worst lens (even attractive ones in certain places) (by choice since there is the most profit in finding a way to demonize people, and be a victim). Women mold themselves to see attractive people in the best lens (forgoing human morality they claim to cling to like "christianity") for the most superficial gain (if the attractive people are on their side/ attainable). Perceptions follow selfish agendas eventually.

Women tacitly see things in a group-affiliation aspiration/ ego-oriented drive for dominarchal circles.
Women want to become a part of these dominarchal circles, and yet fight against them when it is not in their best interests. Or simply because they reject her.
They make excuses to get closer to these circles (when they know they are wrong). Or demonize them (when they want them to be wrong for things they're not committing). Morals to them are conditioned. But they hope to make their agendas in the dark, their truth of themselves.
The more difficult it is to fit the needlehole of being the most distinguished IN adornment (which subcommunicates high status) by face/ looks/ eye color/ etc. when you don't have the attributes for it.

 

[starystulejarz]

Just like how people decide to buy real estate. Through instinct within a few seconds, not careful thinking. Sure, they run the pros and cons after viewing the house, but that shit is supplemental to the subconscious decision that was already made in the first few seconds.

Link: https://activerain.com/blogsview/32...seconds-whether-they-are-interested-in-a-home

And 99% of people act like it's their own decision and not their monkey brain which just liked how that home (or male) looked, they just rationalize it without noticing that their own will is just illusion. You can't control what you like, you can't control which words will come to your head you are just npc driven by subconscious brain. With meditation you can calm it but it will never truly go away.

 

[Pinpoint]

And 99% of people act like it's their own decision and not their monkey brain which just liked how that home (or male) looked, they just rationalize it without noticing that their own will is just illusion. You can't control what you like, you can't control which words will come to your head you are just npc driven by subconscious brain. With meditation you can calm it but it will never truly go away.

rationalizations about virtue, about something being irrational are all just veneers for people and their superficial selections.

 

[LitVirgin]

I never understood why you need to be skilled to engage another human being in conversation unless foids arent human at all