Women aren't meant to create only children. The proof of this is that they have two breasts. They're able to feed two simultaneously. They can make twins via IVF. According to Google, "Research suggests that twins, especially identical twins, may live longer than singletons, according to the North Carolina Medical Society and UW News" though "Yes, twins generally have a higher mortality rate than singletons, particularly in early life." Mothers can feed more than two since the children can take turn feeding. Nowadays, there's baby formula so maybe women can feed even more children than in the past. I think breastfeeding acts as birth control too, so formula is better than breastfeeding because birth control reduces the birth rate. Breastfeeding is degenerate.
Also more proof women aren't meant to make just one child is that they are fertile since their teens to their 40s or 50s when they hit menopause. Birth spacing is unnatural. If birth spacing were natural, non-breastfeeding women wouldn't be menstruating right after giving birth though I guess not breastfeeding is unnatural. Propounding birth spacing lowers the birth rate. Women should make more children as soon as they give birth (though maybe not as I explain later in this post) Even if you think birth spacing is good, you can make a lot of children during your fertility window. A birth spacing interval is a minimum, but you can treat it as a maximum too at the same time. Too much birth spacing is bad as Google says: "While there isn't a strict medical guideline against birth spacing over 5 years, there's evidence suggesting potential risks, including a higher risk of preeclampsia and difficulties during labor."
Birth spacing is associated with lower adverse health outcomes to the infant, but it's better to be born like that than to not be born. There is also the benefit that women experience less maternal mortality when birth spacing though. Google AI says, "Maternal mortality rates in the US vary by age group, with older women (40+) having the highest rates. Specifically, women 40 and older had a rate of 138.5 deaths per 100,000 live births in 2021, compared to 20.4 for women under 25. Maternal mortality rates also increase with age, with the greatest rise seen in women 35 and older. " Other things increase maternal mortality too, so if you care about it you should be in favor of having children while young.
According to my math, a birth spacing interval of 2 years allows you to make 13 children between ages 16 and 40. With an interval of 18 months, you can make 17. Women should make at least 13 in their lifetime. 17 is a bit, maybe birth spacing(and breastfeeding) isn't that bad. Two years is a long time to wait for some people though. They're impatient. They want all their children now. That's where IVF-induced multiple pregnancies can happen. Some people might also decide they don't want as big of a family as they wanted at the start of making children. That's another reason why IVF-induced multiple pregnancies are good.
Also, not making siblings for an only child is child abuse. That child may have friends at school or around his home, but he'll be lonely in his house.
Also more proof women aren't meant to make just one child is that they are fertile since their teens to their 40s or 50s when they hit menopause. Birth spacing is unnatural. If birth spacing were natural, non-breastfeeding women wouldn't be menstruating right after giving birth though I guess not breastfeeding is unnatural. Propounding birth spacing lowers the birth rate. Women should make more children as soon as they give birth (though maybe not as I explain later in this post) Even if you think birth spacing is good, you can make a lot of children during your fertility window. A birth spacing interval is a minimum, but you can treat it as a maximum too at the same time. Too much birth spacing is bad as Google says: "While there isn't a strict medical guideline against birth spacing over 5 years, there's evidence suggesting potential risks, including a higher risk of preeclampsia and difficulties during labor."
Birth spacing is associated with lower adverse health outcomes to the infant, but it's better to be born like that than to not be born. There is also the benefit that women experience less maternal mortality when birth spacing though. Google AI says, "Maternal mortality rates in the US vary by age group, with older women (40+) having the highest rates. Specifically, women 40 and older had a rate of 138.5 deaths per 100,000 live births in 2021, compared to 20.4 for women under 25. Maternal mortality rates also increase with age, with the greatest rise seen in women 35 and older. " Other things increase maternal mortality too, so if you care about it you should be in favor of having children while young.
According to my math, a birth spacing interval of 2 years allows you to make 13 children between ages 16 and 40. With an interval of 18 months, you can make 17. Women should make at least 13 in their lifetime. 17 is a bit, maybe birth spacing(and breastfeeding) isn't that bad. Two years is a long time to wait for some people though. They're impatient. They want all their children now. That's where IVF-induced multiple pregnancies can happen. Some people might also decide they don't want as big of a family as they wanted at the start of making children. That's another reason why IVF-induced multiple pregnancies are good.
Also, not making siblings for an only child is child abuse. That child may have friends at school or around his home, but he'll be lonely in his house.
