We all know how stupid, childish, and impulsive women are, but could it be that women are actually on a lower plane of sentience and consciousness compared to men? This will be water to some, but I still felt like going over this topic briefly.
Before I begin, it's important to define what sentience is, as well as what consciousness is. Sentience is essentially a living being's ability to have subjective experiences of perception, feeling, and thought. A sentient being is a being that can perceive and react to the world around it, and have a personal experience of sensations, emotions, and intellect. Sentience implies a level of consciousness and awareness that goes beyond biological function and basic reactive behavior. I want to make it clear that I do not believe in the 'sentience' many people believe in, because in the end we are all biological machines that function based on things we can't control—when I think about sentience, I am referring to the subjective perception of the world and the aforementioned list of things which is a bit of an 'illusion.'
As for consciousness, it is also awareness, but at a much higher level—the ability to think and use reason to solve problems and make sense of the world around an individual. Both sentience and consciousness, in my opinion, are on a spectrum, and the higher a being's consciousness, the more capable it is of reflecting on events and phenomena, combining knowledge from various fields, figuring out causes and effects, and coming up with solutions to problems. The highest levels of consciousness allow an animal or human to reflect on their lives and question their own existence—the whys, their purpose and their own futures.
Now that the definitions are out of the way, I will break this down like a spectrum, and I’ll explain why I believe women fall closer to the bottom. Here's a quick spectrum that I have made—it's important to note this is a highly simplified spectrum that only serves to convey my ideas:
Women, on average, don’t engage with the deeper truths of existence the way men or great thinkers do. They have always relied on men for support, and they have evolved to reflect that, which is why I believe they deserve their position on this lower end of the scale. It’s not that they’re entirely devoid of logic or awareness, but they simply aren’t as advanced as men in this regard because they never had to be. And quite frankly, even in the instances that they are aware, they are motivated by selfishness and by a way of thinking that men simply do not have.
Of course you could make a similar argument about normies and how they are driven by similar instincts, and you'd be mostly correct. However, I still believe the normie is superior to women in many ways. This is mainly due to the fact men have a greater variety in their level of intelligence—they are simultaneously more likely to be retarded and geniuses. This variety is speculated to be related to the Y chromosome which leads to greater instability. Females are more likely to be similar to each other, as if they are a monolith—easy to control, like cattle.
I think that understanding this hierarchy is important because it helps us understand why women act the way they do. They don’t think like us, and it’s clear that their awareness and intellectual capacity aren’t at the same level. This is why they often make choices that seem shallow, impulsive, and self-centered. They might not be as sentient as they think they are.
This doesn’t mean that women are completely incapable of higher-level thought. But if we’re being honest, most women are more on the emotional side of the spectrum, and their decisions are often made based on how they feel in the moment rather than from a place of deep, logical reasoning. This is the main reason why they should never be in positions of decision-making and control—since that will inevitably lead to terrible outcomes and decisions that are not logically sound and nonsensical. We can already see that happening in our current society with the amount of power women have been given, and the resultant harmful effects.
Conclusion/TL;DR: women are not as advanced as men when it comes to thinking critically and logically. While they may be more developed than children or animals, they fall short compared to the higher forms of sentience that men can achieve. This could be due to various reasons such as the way we evolved as species as well as the challenges men face and the pressure that is constantly placed on them to prove themselves. And even in the instances that women are aware, they are motivated by selfishness and their despicable nature.
Before I begin, it's important to define what sentience is, as well as what consciousness is. Sentience is essentially a living being's ability to have subjective experiences of perception, feeling, and thought. A sentient being is a being that can perceive and react to the world around it, and have a personal experience of sensations, emotions, and intellect. Sentience implies a level of consciousness and awareness that goes beyond biological function and basic reactive behavior. I want to make it clear that I do not believe in the 'sentience' many people believe in, because in the end we are all biological machines that function based on things we can't control—when I think about sentience, I am referring to the subjective perception of the world and the aforementioned list of things which is a bit of an 'illusion.'
As for consciousness, it is also awareness, but at a much higher level—the ability to think and use reason to solve problems and make sense of the world around an individual. Both sentience and consciousness, in my opinion, are on a spectrum, and the higher a being's consciousness, the more capable it is of reflecting on events and phenomena, combining knowledge from various fields, figuring out causes and effects, and coming up with solutions to problems. The highest levels of consciousness allow an animal or human to reflect on their lives and question their own existence—the whys, their purpose and their own futures.
Now that the definitions are out of the way, I will break this down like a spectrum, and I’ll explain why I believe women fall closer to the bottom. Here's a quick spectrum that I have made—it's important to note this is a highly simplified spectrum that only serves to convey my ideas:
Bacteria & Basic Life Forms
At the very bottom of the sentience & consciousness spectrum, you have single-celled organisms like bacteria. These organisms are motivated solely by instincts for survival; they don't actually "think" at all. They are pretty much non-sentient and are not capable of feeling sensations in the same way that humans and other animals do. They function by reaction to stimuli through a chemical process, but they do not have a central nervous system or the necessary biochemical pathways to experience emotions, pain, or sensations as higher organisms do—they are biological automatons.Reptiles
Above bacteria, you have reptiles—e.g. snakes—which have more complex reactions to the world around them and are clearly more 'aware' of their surroundings. They are able to sense danger, hunt, and reproduce, but their awareness is still mainly limited to basic instinctual behaviors. When I say 'reptiles' I am referring to the average reptile, since there are many different reptiles and some of them have relatively high levels of consciousness and problem-solving skills.Simians & Other Intelligent Mammals
Simians are next on the spectrum, as well as some other mammals. They have advanced problem-solving skills, emotions, and social structures. They can use tools, communicate, and even learn basic human sign language—they are even able to notice trickery and magic tricks. This level could also include some other intelligent mammals such as dolphins, seeing as they exhibit complex social behaviors, can solve puzzles, and even recognize themselves in mirrors. This shows that they possess a high level of sentience.Children
Children, particularly younger ones, are in a unique spot on this spectrum. I do think they have potential for higher intelligence, but their sentience is still developing. They’re very emotionally driven, and it's quite clear that their ability to perceive and understand the world is limited and basic. Women are incredibly similar to children in that regard—both are impulsive, erratic, and highly controlled by instincts and emotions.Normies
Now we get to the average person—the normie. Normies are mostly driven by emotion and surface-level thinking; they are slaves to their biological instincts and they are unaware of it. Their lives revolve around social validation, hedonism, and avoiding real self-reflection. Their sentience isn’t much more advanced than that of a child, but they can understand basic logic and hold conversations.Incels
This is where we start to diverge. Incels, at least the more self-aware ones that are aware of the blackpill, possess a higher form of sentience. We’re aware of the societal systems in place and the biological nature of humans, and we understand the mechanisms of the world that normies are too blind to see. We think critically and reflect on the deeper meanings of things. This is mainly due to the fact we are disadvantaged in this world, thus, leading us to introspection and attempts at understanding the injustices that we face. I will also add an important point; many incels may be very well aware of social dynamics and human nature, but are absolutely braindead and highly opinionated when it comes to geopolitics and other topics such as history—which leads me to doubt whether incels are really more conscious and intellectual.Great Thinkers
Great thinkers (philosophers, scientists, etc.) are closer to the end of this spectrum. These types of people possess the ability to break down the world in ways that most of us can’t even begin to comprehend. They see through the surface-level distractions that cloud most people’s minds and understand the deeper truths of existence. It's thanks to these people that we are able to advance the human race and achieve things that were thought to be impossible. This also ties well to my main idea, since the vast majority of great thinkers were/are men—it's incredibly rare to find a female genius who is capable of creativity and deep understanding of the universe. I do admire such thinkers as they are able to come up with their own explanations of the world—build their own framework of beliefs and ideas.Aliens (Hypothetical)
Lastly, if we ever encounter aliens, their level of sentience could probably be very different from ours. Who knows how their consciousness might work? Maybe to them, humans would seem like monkeys do to us. This level could also include a hypothetical, highly advanced AI that has deep understanding of the world and developed a level of sentience that we can't comprehend.Women: A Little Above Children?
Now a good question that can be asked is where do women fit into all of this? When you really think about it, they seem to hover somewhere just above children in their level of sentience and consciousness. Why? Because, while they are capable of basic thinking and decision-making, their choices are more often than not emotionally-driven rather than logically sound. They’re more concerned with immediate pleasures and degeneracy, social validation, and surface-level aesthetics than with long-term, critical thinking.Women, on average, don’t engage with the deeper truths of existence the way men or great thinkers do. They have always relied on men for support, and they have evolved to reflect that, which is why I believe they deserve their position on this lower end of the scale. It’s not that they’re entirely devoid of logic or awareness, but they simply aren’t as advanced as men in this regard because they never had to be. And quite frankly, even in the instances that they are aware, they are motivated by selfishness and by a way of thinking that men simply do not have.
Of course you could make a similar argument about normies and how they are driven by similar instincts, and you'd be mostly correct. However, I still believe the normie is superior to women in many ways. This is mainly due to the fact men have a greater variety in their level of intelligence—they are simultaneously more likely to be retarded and geniuses. This variety is speculated to be related to the Y chromosome which leads to greater instability. Females are more likely to be similar to each other, as if they are a monolith—easy to control, like cattle.
I think that understanding this hierarchy is important because it helps us understand why women act the way they do. They don’t think like us, and it’s clear that their awareness and intellectual capacity aren’t at the same level. This is why they often make choices that seem shallow, impulsive, and self-centered. They might not be as sentient as they think they are.
This doesn’t mean that women are completely incapable of higher-level thought. But if we’re being honest, most women are more on the emotional side of the spectrum, and their decisions are often made based on how they feel in the moment rather than from a place of deep, logical reasoning. This is the main reason why they should never be in positions of decision-making and control—since that will inevitably lead to terrible outcomes and decisions that are not logically sound and nonsensical. We can already see that happening in our current society with the amount of power women have been given, and the resultant harmful effects.
Conclusion/TL;DR: women are not as advanced as men when it comes to thinking critically and logically. While they may be more developed than children or animals, they fall short compared to the higher forms of sentience that men can achieve. This could be due to various reasons such as the way we evolved as species as well as the challenges men face and the pressure that is constantly placed on them to prove themselves. And even in the instances that women are aware, they are motivated by selfishness and their despicable nature.
