Women are not attracted towards men.

[river_flow]

Women are not heterosexual and are not attracted towards men.

They are attracted towards only -
1. Chads , Tyrones.
2. Criminals , Thugs.
3. Feminine men.

 

[nohope.]

Women are not heterosexual and are not attracted towards men.

They are attracted towards only -
1. Chads , Tyrones.
2. Criminals , Thugs.
3. Feminine men.

they aren't attracted to feminine men they are attracted to pretty boys

 

[Jealous Freak]

Women are attracted to someone that would beat her.

 

[Puppeter]

least retarded incels.is thread

 

[Doomer Guy]

They are chadsexual not heterosexual

 

[IncelKing]

Well women are not sexually attracted to majority of men (sub 7), yet most Normies and even a few incels can get laid if they moneymaxx as women give more importance to wealth than looks once women enter the working world.

It’s only in school and college that women select a man NOT for financial/material gain, but because they are sexually attracted to the man.

however this type of attraction is not real “love”, this type of attraction can be classified as “lust” because it is based on physical attractiveness whereas love is based on emotional attractiveness.

So even the few men that women are genuinely physically attracted to are not actually “loved” by the women, they are lusted and sexually desired by the women.

The difference between the two cases is if a woman genuinely “loves” you (attraction to personality), she will stay with you even if hypothetically your looks deteriorates significantly after you suffer an acid-attack or car crash, and she will stay loyal to you even if she has bettER options.

Whereas if a woman simply lusts after you and sexually desires you, she will leave you the moment your looks deteriorates significantly and will be likely to cheat on you with better men than yourself.

Also, keep in mind, you (as a person) are the consciousness inhabiting your body, you are not the body itself.

So when a woman loves you she is attracted to your consciousness (which is who you really are), whereas if she lusts after you she is only attracted to your body, she is only attracted to the physical shell inhabited by your consciousness rather than being attracted to the consciousness itself.

So in conclusion, women may be sexually attracted to few men (chads) but they don’t love ANY man unconditionally, women will always be with a man for personal gain (money/wealth from betas and genetics/sexual pleasure from alphas), and their attraction to men is never based on men’s “internal” attributes which define him as a unique person (his mindset, beliefs, goals etc), instead their attraction to men is based on mens’ “external” attributes (wealth, physical appearance) which don’t define who he is as a “person”.

 

[river_flow]

It’s only in school and college that women select a man NOT for financial/material gain, but because they are sexually attracted to the man.

however this type of attraction is not real “love”, this type of attraction can be classified as “lust” because it is based on physical attractiveness whereas love is based on emotional attractiveness.

No they are also emotionally attracted to these men otherwise why would they talk to these men for longs hours on phone or spend romantic time with them.

 

[IncelKing]

No they are also emotionally attracted to these men otherwise why would they talk to these men for longs hours on phone or spend romantic time with them.

women don’t need men for socialisation, they can get socialisation easily from other girls, so when it comes to interacting with men, women prioritise sex over socialisation.


As a result of women prioritising sex over socialisation when it comes to interacting with men, if she is with Chad for 4 hours of the day and he spends 3 out of those 4 hours either being mute/silent or not being able to engage in interesting conversation, she will still tolerate it for the sake of 1 hour of sex from him.

Likewise the average person tolerates working 5 days a week just to enjoy 2 days off because they prioritise survival over taking more days of and having more free-time in the short-term but ending up decreasing your chances of survival in the long-term due to lack of money.

 

[river_flow]

women don’t need men for socialisation, they can get socialisation easily from other girls, so when it comes to men, they prioritise sex over socialisation.


As a result of women prioritising sex over socialisation when it comes to interacting with men, if she is with Chad for 4 hours of the day and he spends 3 out of those 4 hours either being mute/silent or not being able to engage in interesting conversation, she will still tolerate it for the sake of 1 hour of sex from him.

Likewise the average person tolerates working 5 days a week just to enjoy 2 days off because they prioritise survival over taking more days of and having more free-time in the short-term but ending up decreasing your chances of survival in the long-term due to lack of money.

But I have seeen women taking to their boyfriends for long hours on phone .
Some even be on their phone for 24 hours with their boyfriends.

 

[RuudVanNistelrooy]

Women are not heterosexual and are not attracted towards men.

They are attracted towards only -
1. Chads , Tyrones.
2. Criminals , Thugs.
3. Feminine men. Prettyboys

4. Cahdlites, Chaddams
5. Dogs

 

[depressedblackcel]

Women are not heterosexual and are not attracted towards men.

They are attracted towards only -
1. Chads , Tyrones.
2. Criminals , Thugs.
3. Feminine men.

There’s one more and that is athletes.

 

[IncelKing]

But I have seeen women taking to their boyfriends for long hours on phone .
Some even be on their phone for 24 hours with their boyfriends.

You don’t have to be a super interesting guy to provide social fulfilment to most women, most women don’t have interesting personalities themselves so they are easily socially fulfilled by guys with average personality.

you just need to have basic social skills and be NT (or at least have mild autism rather than moderate/severe autism) to provide emotional fulfilment to women, most chads are bluepilled (you’re more likely to get blackpilled from growing up receiving negative reinforcement from society than if you grew up receiving positive reinforcement from society) hence they at least have a personality which is similiar to most people and there is nothing to distinguish their personality as being “negative” compared to most people (who are also bluepilled).

These chads meet the basic requirement to emotionally please women, hence women can tolerate talking him to him for hours just so she can have sex with him

Desire to have sex with chad is actually why women socialise with him in the first place, women want to be able to have sex with chad exclusively rather than having to share him with other women, which is only possible if she socialises with him and has a good enough personality for him to choose her as a partner in a relationship rather than keeping her as a one-night-stand option.

 

[vidyacel]

Well women are not sexually attracted to majority of men (sub 7), yet most Normies and even a few incels can get laid if they moneymaxx as women give more importance to wealth than looks once women enter the working world.

It’s only in school and college that women select a man NOT for financial/material gain, but because they are sexually attracted to the man.

however this type of attraction is not real “love”, this type of attraction can be classified as “lust” because it is based on physical attractiveness whereas love is based on emotional attractiveness.

So even the few men that women are genuinely physically attracted to are not actually “loved” by the women, they are lusted and sexually desired by the women.

The difference between the two cases is if a woman genuinely “loves” you (attraction to personality), she will stay with you even if hypothetically your looks deteriorates significantly after you suffer an acid-attack or car crash, and she will stay loyal to you even if she has bettER options.

Whereas if a woman simply lusts after you and sexually desires you, she will leave you the moment your looks deteriorates significantly and will be likely to cheat on you with better men than yourself.

Also, keep in mind, you (as a person) are the consciousness inhabiting your body, you are not the body itself.

So when a woman loves you she is attracted to your consciousness (which is who you really are), whereas if she lusts after you she is only attracted to your body, she is only attracted to the physical shell inhabited by your consciousness rather than being attracted to the consciousness itself.

So in conclusion, women may be sexually attracted to few men (chads) but they don’t love ANY man unconditionally, women will always be with a man for personal gain (money/wealth from betas and genetics/sexual pleasure from alphas), and their attraction to men is never based on men’s “internal” attributes which define him as a unique person (his mindset, beliefs, goals etc), instead their attraction to men is based on mens’ external attributes (wealth, physical appearance) which don’t define who he is as a “person”.

You have solved the riddle, that´s the gist of it.
The state of affairs is pretty sad.