Caelus
★★★★
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2023
- Posts
- 1,253
Women can never be as lonely as you. Women can never be as mentally ill as you. Women can never be as smart as you. Women can never be as dumb as you. Women can never drive as bad as you. Women can never cook as good as you. Women can never be as bad as you. Women can never be as good as you.
I’m not pulling these out of my ass, I’m only going to slightly curate them. Women are always concentrated somewhere in the middle. They have no potential to pave the way to becoming anything more than they are capable of. You see their exact same braindead copy-&-pasted response to the same stimulus all the time (omg, he’s so tall ). They are more than happy practicing identically pathetic habits for an eternity. They live a plain and simple life with bleak goals and ambitions that are mostly societally oriented (that is to say, they will only do things so long as they yield social benefits). Whether good or bad, they’re humanly incapable of taking on extreme sides, at least not in the same way as men.
After women give birth and inevitably become conduit and a vessel to their offspring, men on the other hand continue to harvest, grow, and “concur,” and if the roles were to switch or if men were to deviate from that path, chances are they will end up feeling cognitively confused, stretched, and out of place, as if there’s something wrong or there’s something they’re still missing out on in life. We can’t settle down the same way women can do past a certain age. Most men themselves would agree that, if they were to become "househusbands,” for instance, unlike women, they would eventually feel ill and start going crazy for not doing or applying themselves to anything else.
Edit: for some stupid fucking reasons it’s not letting it redirect so just put an https://doi.org/ behind this: 10.1016/j.bandc.2014.08.006
The TL-water is wet-DR version of this: due to having 10 times the amount of white matter related to intelligence than men, which is strongly associated with general and perceptual dissimulation (looks don’t matter! ) and a fundamental flaw in being able to logically observe reality (studies are biased! XYZ because I say so and I FEEL so and I know a guy btw! ), women have a lower IQ than men and therefore tend to gravitate towards the center of everything, hence they’re the ones who mostly enjoy supporting the current thing, would rather follow pre-established courses and not think for themselves, are usually scared of saying their true opinion in case of it being unpopular or politically incorrect, etc.
Given the small differences in means, explanations for sex differences in wider domains such examination attainment at age 16 need to look beyond conceptions of ‘ability’. Boys tend to be both the lowest AND the highest performers in terms of their reasoning abilities, which warns against the danger of stereotyping boys as low achievers.”
I’m not pulling these out of my ass, I’m only going to slightly curate them. Women are always concentrated somewhere in the middle. They have no potential to pave the way to becoming anything more than they are capable of. You see their exact same braindead copy-&-pasted response to the same stimulus all the time (omg, he’s so tall ). They are more than happy practicing identically pathetic habits for an eternity. They live a plain and simple life with bleak goals and ambitions that are mostly societally oriented (that is to say, they will only do things so long as they yield social benefits). Whether good or bad, they’re humanly incapable of taking on extreme sides, at least not in the same way as men.
After women give birth and inevitably become conduit and a vessel to their offspring, men on the other hand continue to harvest, grow, and “concur,” and if the roles were to switch or if men were to deviate from that path, chances are they will end up feeling cognitively confused, stretched, and out of place, as if there’s something wrong or there’s something they’re still missing out on in life. We can’t settle down the same way women can do past a certain age. Most men themselves would agree that, if they were to become "househusbands,” for instance, unlike women, they would eventually feel ill and start going crazy for not doing or applying themselves to anything else.
Edit: for some stupid fucking reasons it’s not letting it redirect so just put an https://doi.org/ behind this: 10.1016/j.bandc.2014.08.006
The TL-water is wet-DR version of this: due to having 10 times the amount of white matter related to intelligence than men, which is strongly associated with general and perceptual dissimulation (looks don’t matter! ) and a fundamental flaw in being able to logically observe reality (studies are biased! XYZ because I say so and I FEEL so and I know a guy btw! ), women have a lower IQ than men and therefore tend to gravitate towards the center of everything, hence they’re the ones who mostly enjoy supporting the current thing, would rather follow pre-established courses and not think for themselves, are usually scared of saying their true opinion in case of it being unpopular or politically incorrect, etc.
Last edited: