L
Liptusg
Recruit
★★★
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2022
- Posts
- 245
That dumb fucking argument pops up constantly in sex-related subs, as women always seek endless justifications of why they can never be privileged as a gender and why they their sexual selectiveness isn't inherent, as every evolutionary psychologist and Charles Darwin himself ( In his essay on human sexual selection ) knows. And of course, Reddit numales being what they are, everyone immediately started clapping and praising her for her 'genius' analogy and brillaint analysis. I wanted to debunk her right then and there, but my ban-evasion account is too new to post, so I'll do it here instead:
And my smackdown of this idiotic talking point:
The oft-parroted 'Orgasm argument', much as with most of the dogmatic lines found on gynocentric Reddit where they can face no resistance since opposition is banned or shunned, unravels instantly like an house of cards as soon as you apply a smidgen of logic to it.
Men's ease of orgasming *cannot* account for and has no correlation with the male sex drive. If the Almighty orgasm was such a chief factor's in men's eagerness to have sex while the reverse holds true for women as you describe it, it would actually make no sense at all for men to expend any time and energy whatsoever on pursuing female partners.
Men don't need a partner to orgasm. They can orgasm in less than a minute using their hand, and without having to put any effort into it whatsoever. If orgasm was the goal of sex, the psychological influences behind incels, or indeed behind any men in history going to great lengths to obtain female sexual partners would not exist - men would just experience perfect contentedness and bliss by jacking it off in their rooms where they can orgasm to infinity.
Sex is not about the orgasm - neither for men, nor for women, who also tend to attest in TwoXChromosomes or wherever that they can achieve superior orgasms with their vibrators or sex toys because they know their own vagina than some random man does, yet most of them will still never go without sex for long anyway. The *principal* allure of sex is intimacy, validation, and the oxytocin released caused by any manner of physical touch, from foreplay to kissing to blowjobs or the act of sex itself. The ejaculation is, as fun as it can be for all of 5 seconds, **the least important part of sex**. In fact, female orgasms when they do happen are actually more intense and longer than any man's could biologically be.
From Orgasms, to fear of serial killers, to psychic sensors, we have no need of a never-ending list of justifications to explain something that has been known since Darwin wrote about sexual selection in humans - Women are inherently more sexually selective than men. They don't find nearly as men attractive as vice versa, which is why their supply is sparse while men's demand is through the roof. That's it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course, as we all know, the idea that women do not have an immeasurably easier time finding relationships either is also bullshit, as virtually any dating subreddit or website will demonstrate. A whiteknight's 'retort' to that fact? Well, you see, the majority of men on planet Earth simply suck. Men on the dating market all suck and women are a flawless gender that has to sift through all the trash which is the majority of men in order to find a decent one, which is why women are still victims even if they have a million guys willing to date them. Yes, really, that's their argument, just open the comment chain:
Ahhh... women and their loyal little whiteknights, what a shitshow. What kind of universe could possibly steer evolution toward the formation of such creatures? And these are the brainwashed, female supremacist beliefs that any 'good virgin' is supposed to embrace instead of the Blackpill.
And my smackdown of this idiotic talking point:
The oft-parroted 'Orgasm argument', much as with most of the dogmatic lines found on gynocentric Reddit where they can face no resistance since opposition is banned or shunned, unravels instantly like an house of cards as soon as you apply a smidgen of logic to it.
Men's ease of orgasming *cannot* account for and has no correlation with the male sex drive. If the Almighty orgasm was such a chief factor's in men's eagerness to have sex while the reverse holds true for women as you describe it, it would actually make no sense at all for men to expend any time and energy whatsoever on pursuing female partners.
Men don't need a partner to orgasm. They can orgasm in less than a minute using their hand, and without having to put any effort into it whatsoever. If orgasm was the goal of sex, the psychological influences behind incels, or indeed behind any men in history going to great lengths to obtain female sexual partners would not exist - men would just experience perfect contentedness and bliss by jacking it off in their rooms where they can orgasm to infinity.
Sex is not about the orgasm - neither for men, nor for women, who also tend to attest in TwoXChromosomes or wherever that they can achieve superior orgasms with their vibrators or sex toys because they know their own vagina than some random man does, yet most of them will still never go without sex for long anyway. The *principal* allure of sex is intimacy, validation, and the oxytocin released caused by any manner of physical touch, from foreplay to kissing to blowjobs or the act of sex itself. The ejaculation is, as fun as it can be for all of 5 seconds, **the least important part of sex**. In fact, female orgasms when they do happen are actually more intense and longer than any man's could biologically be.
From Orgasms, to fear of serial killers, to psychic sensors, we have no need of a never-ending list of justifications to explain something that has been known since Darwin wrote about sexual selection in humans - Women are inherently more sexually selective than men. They don't find nearly as men attractive as vice versa, which is why their supply is sparse while men's demand is through the roof. That's it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Of course, as we all know, the idea that women do not have an immeasurably easier time finding relationships either is also bullshit, as virtually any dating subreddit or website will demonstrate. A whiteknight's 'retort' to that fact? Well, you see, the majority of men on planet Earth simply suck. Men on the dating market all suck and women are a flawless gender that has to sift through all the trash which is the majority of men in order to find a decent one, which is why women are still victims even if they have a million guys willing to date them. Yes, really, that's their argument, just open the comment chain:
Ahhh... women and their loyal little whiteknights, what a shitshow. What kind of universe could possibly steer evolution toward the formation of such creatures? And these are the brainwashed, female supremacist beliefs that any 'good virgin' is supposed to embrace instead of the Blackpill.