G
As in no yelling and name calling... just pure facts and logic...
id ragemax i guess
The discussion would be futile
Death
no
I'm capable of having a civilized conversation. Women aren't. I've already had several debates with feminists where I would cite studies and statistics. They'd always resort to insults and could never prove any of their statements.
such a waste of time
I've tried. It always ends up in them shaming you
They also seem to love bringing up data that doesn't exist (zombies statistics)
Yea. "90 percent of women are raped
"Spruce?
"Don't question this asshole! I have a friend who was raped! All women will tell you they've had experiences
"
Waste of time no point
Yes
Yes, I'd just bring up the fact that women were never oppressed in the past nor are they oppressed now & the fact that women only want equality when it suits them anyway.
Yes, a civilized discussion between my fist and her face.
Nothing to discuss
I'm only interested in curing feminism with good rape
How am I supposed to have a normal discussion with an irrational retard who wants to end me?
pure facts and logic difficult with a normie. Logic is the most rare skill and knowledge.
Feminism is a religion, you can't debate with a fanatical Muslim, the same with feminists.
I would never debate a sexhaver
I see no problem doing that but then again I don't see any motivation to do that either.
Usually feminists who say they want equality and that they hate gender roles still want men to stay in our traditional roles. If you call them out on that they just lash out. Don't even think that feminists are ready to have a level-headed conversation with anyone.
The only reason the ideology is promoted is because big multinational corporations wanted women to participate in the workforce thus lowering wages and causing people to consume more. The ideology itself has no merits of any kind and it is kept alive by artificial respiration by the rich elites like Soros pumping hundreds of millions to these soft marxist entities spreading it.
Usually feminists who say they want equality and that they hate gender roles still want men to stay in our traditional roles. If you call them out on that they just lash out. Don't even think that feminists are ready to have a level-headed conversation with anyone.
The only reason the ideology is promoted is because big multinational corporations wanted women to participate in the workforce thus lowering wages and causing people to consume more. The ideology itself has no merits of any kind and it is kept alive by artificial respiration by the rich elites like Soros pumping hundreds of millions to these soft marxist entities spreading it.
I think debate is overrated. Most people don't think logically. When most people enter a debate, they're chiefly looking to reaffirm their position and protect their self-interests. They're not legitimately exploring ideas or actually contemplating shifting their position. People will appeal to any fallacy in order to avoid compromising their preconceived worldviews. Besides, the outcomes of a debate doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the merits of your arguments. You can lose a debate just by being ugly or lacking charisma.
An NT Chad will destroy you in a debate, even if he patently wrong about everything. A feminist would beat us just because of her social privileges and cognitive distortions like the women are wonderful effect. Lookism and social influence are far more persuasive than logical reasoning and rational thought. Most debates end up being an exhausting waste of time.
An NT Chad will destroy you in a debate, even if he patently wrong about everything. A feminist would beat us just because of her social privileges and cognitive distortions like the women are wonderful effect. Lookism and social influence are far more persuasive than logical reasoning and rational thought. Most debates end up being an exhausting waste of time.
Last edited:
D
You can't fix the tail of a dog that is curved already
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
